Original ResearchOlder Emergency Department Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Receive Lower Quality of Care Than Younger Patients
Introduction
Morbidity and mortality after acute myocardial infarction is particularly high for older patients.1 Previous studies have shown that hospitalized elderly acute myocardial infarction patients receive lower-quality medical care than younger patients, which may partly explain age-related differences in outcomes.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 However, little is known about the degree to which age-related disparities in care occur in the emergency department (ED) because existing studies have not differentiated between care provided in the ED and in the inpatient setting.
The ED is a critical setting in which to evaluate acute myocardial infarction care because most hospital-based cardiac care starts in the ED. The early administration of key therapies (eg, acute reperfusion) has been associated with improved patient outcomes.29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 35 Furthermore, care initiated in the ED (eg, aspirin or β-blockers) may be more likely to be continued during hospitalization and after discharge.
The objective of this study is to assess age-related rates of aspirin, β-blocker, and reperfusion therapy use for ED acute myocardial infarction patients. We hypothesized that eligible older acute myocardial infarction patients would be less likely to receive effective therapies than younger patients independent of demographic, medical history, and clinical characteristics. The results of this study may identify an important gap in ED-care quality and could identify a population that might benefit from a directed quality-improvement intervention.
Section snippets
Study Design and Setting
The Emergency Department Quality in Myocardial Infarction Project is a 2-year retrospective cohort study focusing on the quality of care for ED acute myocardial infarction patients. The study was conducted at 5 community EDs in Colorado and California from July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2002.
Selection of Participants
Patients were included in the study if they presented urgently to the ED, had elevated cardiac markers diagnostic for acute myocardial infarction in the ED or within 24 hours of ED arrival, and had a
Characteristics of the Study Subjects (Table 1)
Of the 2,216 patients in the study population, 177 (8.0 %) were younger than 50 years, 329 (14.8%) were aged 50 to 59 years, 432 (19.5%) were aged 60 to 69 years, 667 (30.1%) were aged 70 to 79 years, 508 (22.9%) were aged 80 to 89 years, and 103 (4.6%) were aged 90 years or older. The population was 38.3% women and 61.7% white. Cardiac risk factors and comorbidities were common.
With increasing age, there was an increase in the proportions of patients who were women, white, and had a history of
Limitations
Several potential limitations should be addressed. First, this study was conducted in 5 community hospital EDs. Although our results may not be generalizable to all EDs, our findings are consistent with studies evaluating the relationship between age and quality of care for hospitalized acute myocardial infarction patients in other patient populations.8, 13, 26 Second, we conducted a retrospective study that relied on data available from medical record review. The findings are subject to
Discussion
The objective of this study was to determine whether older ED patients receive guideline-recommended treatments for acute myocardial infarction as frequently as younger patients. We found that eligible older patients with acute myocardial infarction were less likely to receive aspirin, β-blockers, and reperfusion therapy than eligible younger patients. Differences in treatment rates by age persisted after adjustment for other demographic, medical history, and clinical characteristics and were
References (46)
- et al.
Outlook after acute myocardial infarction in the very elderly compared with that in younger patients aged 65 to 75 years
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1990) - et al.
Comparison of risk and patterns of practice in patients older and younger than 70 years with acute myocardial infarction in a two year period (1987-1989)
Am J Cardiol
(1991) - et al.
Effect of age on use of thrombolytic therapy and mortality in acute myocardial infarction
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1991) - et al.
Beta-blocker therapy in acute myocardial infarction: evidence for underutilization in the elderly
Am J Med
(1992) - et al.
Mortality risk and patterns of practice in 2,070 patients with acute myocardial infarction, 1987-1992
Chest
(1994) - et al.
Differences in treatment of acute myocardial infarction by sex, age, and other factors (the Stanford Five-City Project)
Am J Cardiol
(1996) - et al.
How should age affect management of acute myocardial infarction?
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Decade-long trends (1986 to 1997) in the medical treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective
Am Heart J
(2001) - et al.
Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)
Lancet
(2002) - et al.
Effects of age on the quality of care provided to older patients with acute myocardial infarction
Am J Med
(2003)
Impact of time to treatment with tissue plasminogen activator on morbidity and mortality following acute myocardial infarction (The Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction)
Am J Cardiol
Factors associated with delay in reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: analysis of the cooperative cardiovascular project
Am Heart J
A comparison of the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 with the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project
J Am Coll Cardiol
ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: executive summary: a report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines on the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction)
J Am Coll Cardiol
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: 2004 Update
Acute myocardial infarction: contemporary risk and management in older versus younger patients
Can J Cardiol
Diagnostic testing in acute myocardial infarction: does patient age influence utilization patterns? The Worcester Heart Attack Study
Am J Epidemiol
Selection bias in the use of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction
JAMA
Acute myocardial infarction in the Medicare population: process of care and clinical outcomes
JAMA
Changes in acute myocardial infarction risk and patterns of practice for patients older and younger than 70 years, 1987-90
Can J Cardiol
Differences in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction according to patient age
J Am Geriatr Soc
Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993): observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction
Circulation
Aspirin in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in elderly Medicare beneficiaries: patterns of use and outcomes
Circulation
Cited by (50)
Aspirin use in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients transported by emergency medical services (EMS)
2023, American Journal of Emergency MedicineImpact of emergency department length of stay on anxiety and comfort in older people
2021, International Emergency NursingCitation Excerpt :Older ED users are more likely to have cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression [29], and are at risk of unrecognised functional decline, cognitive impairment and delirium [11,30]. There is also evidence of lower quality of care and less likelihood of evidence-based care for older ED users when compared to younger patients [31–33]. A systematic review of 28 papers related to older adults views of quality of ED care highlighted that older patients with prolonged ED stays perceived deficiencies in their care.
Effect of gender on evidence-based practice for Australian patients with acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective multi-site study
2017, Australasian Emergency Nursing JournalCitation Excerpt :Women in the current study were significantly older than men. Perceived lower urgency and delayed ED treatment for ACS have previously been attributed to advanced age [27,44,45]. In this study, both gender and age may have influenced perceived triage acuity, time delays to ECG, as well as decisions to admit to specialty or general wards for early ACS care.
Management and outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in nursing home versus community-dwelling older patients: A propensity matched study
2014, Journal of the American Medical Directors AssociationFactors associated with delayed treatment onset for acute myocardial infarction in Victorian emergency departments: A regression tree analysis
2013, Australasian Emergency Nursing JournalCitation Excerpt :A number of clinical and non-clinical factors have been reported to negatively impact upon treatment decisions and reduce the application of evidence based treatments for numerous patient groups with AMI. These include disparities related to race and ethnicity,19 distance to catheter laboratories,20 patient sex and gender,21,22 age,23,24 urban or non-urban patient address25 and sociodemographic factors generally.26 We believe it is possible many of these variables also affect decisions regarding management for patients with AMI in the ED.
Supervising editor: Brent R. Asplin, MD
Author contributions: DJM conceived the study, obtained funding, and supervised the conduct of the study. DJM, DRV, TMV, TGP, JSR, EEL, and ASG contributed to the design of the study. DRV, TMV, TGP, AJT, FAM, PMH, JSR, and ASG contributed to the data collection. EEL, LC, and DWB managed the data. EEL provided statistical advice on study design, and EEL and LC analyzed the data. DJM drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. DJM takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Funding and support: This project was funded by a grant from the Garfield Memorial Fund. Dr. Masoudi is supported by the National Institute on Aging National Institutes of Health Research Career Award K08-AG01011. Dr. Rumsfeld is supported by VA Health Services Advanced Research Career Development Award RCD-98-341-2.
Presented at the American College of Emergency Physicians Scientific Assembly, October 2004, San Francisco, CA.
Reprints not available from the authors.