Elsevier

Critical Care Clinics

Volume 28, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 1-10
Critical Care Clinics

Costs of Critical Care Medicine

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2011.10.003Get rights and content

Section snippets

National Hospital Databases and CCM Data

There are two national US databases that track hospital use and cost data (Table 1). The first is the commercially available Hospital Statistics report that is annually published by the American Hospital Association (AHA).9 This dataset contains information obtained from the yearly AHA surveys that are voluntarily completed by almost all US hospitals. The second is the Healthcare Cost Report Information System (HCRIS), a dataset composed of the Hospital Cost Reports that are annually submitted

Critical Care Cost Calculations in the United States

The main tenets for understanding CCM utilization and cost in the United States were outlined in 1984 by Berenson12 in a report commissioned by the US government. Recognizing the limitations of the national hospital databases, Berenson suggested that the Russell equation, first described in 1979, be used to “indirectly” calculate national CCM costs.12, 13

The primary goal of the Russell equation is to establish an all-inclusive average ICU cost per day (Fig. 1, step 1). This value is then

Summary of US ICU Cost Studies

Berenson12 estimated that $13 to $15 billion was spent for the care of adult critically ill and coronary care patients in 1982. This CCM cost represented 14% to 17% of total inpatient community hospital costs and 0.7% of the GDP. Using the Russell equation, Jacobs and Noseworthy, estimated 1986 ICU costs in the United States at $33.9 billion, approximating 20% of all inpatient hospital costs, and 0.7% of the GDP (Table 5).14 Halpern and coworkers15 estimated US CCM costs to be $29.5 billion in

Alternative Uses and Approaches to Solving the Russell Equation

Beyond determining national CCM costs, the Russell equation methodology has also been applied to defined hospital networks15 and populations.19, 20 In these analyses, all data to solve the Russell equation was obtained from network or population-specific datasets rather than the AHA or HCRIS. Halpern and colleagues15 determined ICU cost per day for Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) medical centers (1986 to 1992) either directly from the DVA Cost Distribution Report (CDR) or through the

Limitations of Global ICU Cost Approaches

The CCM costing approaches discussed here focus on average daily and aggregate yearly CCM costs of care. Costs attributable to components of CCM care (staffing, technology, medications, and patient care) are not identified. The Russell equation approach also may give the impression that all ICU days are similar in cost. This, however, is not true, as the first day of ICU care is far more resource intensive than subsequent days.25, 26 Additionally, the average ICU daily cost may vary based on

Cost Control Strategies

Given the high costs associated with CCM, cost control strategies have been proposed or implemented by clinicians, hospital administrators, and policy makers.27 These strategies include rationing care,28 reducing unnecessary variation in care by regionalization of critical care services,29, 30 caring for critically ill patients in non-ICU settings (telemetry, step-down units, postanesthesia care units, and ventilator units), fast-tracking surgical patients,31 providing telemedicine coverage to

Summary

Critical care medicine is expensive and continues to grow in a shrinking US hospital system. The main drivers of CCM costs are the numbers and use of ICU beds. Existing hospital databases do not contain all the requisite elements to directly measure CCM costs. Therefore, the Russell equation, an indirect costing methodology, is most commonly used to estimate national CCM costs. Calculating national CCM costs in a standardized manner remains challenging because there is no universal approach to

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (37)

  • N.K. Adhikari et al.

    Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults

    Lancet

    (2010)
  • P. Pronovost et al.

    Using large-scale databases to measure outcomes in critical care

    Crit Care Clin

    (1999)
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111–148, §10409, 124 Stat. 119, 978,...
  • N.A. Halpern et al.

    Critical care medicine in the United States 2000–2005: an analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs

    Crit Care Med

    (2010)
  • H. Wunsch et al.

    Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe

    Crit Care Med

    (2008)
  • H. Wunsch et al.

    Use of intensive care services during terminal hospitalizations in England and the United States

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2009)
  • H. Wunsch et al.

    Comparison of medical admissions to intensive care units in the United States and United kingdom

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2011)
  • R.A. Berenson

    Intensive care units: costs, outcomes and decision making

    (1984)
  • L.B. Russell

    Intensive caretechnology in hospitals, medical advances and their diffusion

  • P. Jacobs et al.

    National estimates of intensive care utilization and costs: Canada and the United States

    Crit Care Med

    (1990)
  • N.A. Halpern et al.

    Federal and nationwide intensive care units and healthcare costs: 1986–1992

    Crit Care Med

    (1994)
  • N.A. Halpern et al.

    Critical care medicine in the United States 1985–2000: an analysis of bed numbers, use, and costs

    Crit Care Med

    (2004)
  • N.A. Halpern et al.

    Changes in critical care beds and occupancy in the United States 1985–2000: differences attributable to hospital size

    Crit Care Med

    (2006)
  • Cited by (49)

    • Reduction of healthcare costs by implementing palliative family conference with the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments

      2020, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
      Citation Excerpt :

      Increasing healthcare costs have been a concern around the world.1–3

    • The influence of the workplace indoor environmental quality on the incidence of psychological and physical symptoms in intensive care units

      2016, Building and Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, “intensive medicine is one of the fields showing remarkable progress, in terms of research as well as treatment” [70]. This statement reflects the social importance of this field; as an example, intensive medicine represents approximately 0.66% of the gross domestic product of the United States, generating over $81 billion dollars in expenses per year [24,48]. It is predicted that in the next 10 years, there will be greater investments in this sector, with the consequent implementation of changes in technology and work processes, including the application of computerized data management [35].

    • The Genesis, Maturation, and Future of Critical Care Cardiology

      2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given the monumental costs of critical care delivery in U.S. health care, it is clear that fiscal responsibility is a concept that we must embrace and leverage as the field of critical care cardiology marches forward (46). The greatest drivers for critical care costs in a hospital are the number of ICU beds and their relative occupancy (47). Therefore, future studies of care delivery in the CICU must account for bed use practices and expenditures.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors have nothing to disclose.

    View full text