Heart Failure
Precision of Echocardiographic Estimates of Right Atrial Pressure in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.06.002Get rights and content

Background

Several methods that estimate right atrial pressure (RAP) from echocardiographic parameters have been proposed. However, their precision (i.e., how much they decrease RAP estimation uncertainty) is unknown. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate and compare the precision of previously proposed RAP estimates in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

Methods

Echocardiographic and invasive hemodynamic data were acquired in 75 patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Measurements were made at the start and 48 to 72 hours after the beginning of treatment. RAP was estimated by method 1, using the cutoffs defined by inferior vena cava diameter (IVCd) and IVCd percentage change (IVCd%change) during inspiration, and by method 2, using IVCd%change and systolic to diastolic hepatic flow ratio (S/Dhep). Method 3 was used in patients with sinus rhythm, using the ratio of early tricuspid inflow and early diastolic tissue Doppler tricuspid annular velocities (E/E′ta). RAP was also estimated by resting IVCd, IVCd during inspiration, IVCd%change, right ventricular regional isovolumetric relaxation time, E/E′ta, right atrial volume index, S/Dhep, right ventricular Tei index, right ventricular E/A, and right atrial emptying fraction. Precision gain was measured as the difference between the standard deviation of RAP and the standard error of the estimate of RAP.

Results

Method 1 (r = 0.48, P < .05), IVCd during inspiration (r = 0.49, P < .0001), IVCd%change (r = 0.41, P < .0001) and IVCd (r = 0.40, P < .0001) had the highest correlation with RAP. The highest gain in precision was also observed with the above methods (9%, 13%, 9%, and 8%, respectively). All other parameters had poor correlation with RAP.

Conclusion

In patients with advanced heart failure, echocardiographic RAP prediction methods showed only modest precision. Furthermore, none of the tested methods resulted in clinically relevant improvements of RAP estimates. Estimating RAP from a single IVCd measurement is at least as precise as using complex prediction methods.

Section snippets

Study Population and Design

This was a prospective observational echocardiographic study of patients admitted to the Heart Failure Unit at the Cleveland Clinic for hemodynamically tailored treatment of acute decompensated systolic heart failure. We prospectively identified patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted to the heart failure intensive care unit at the Cleveland Clinic for pulmonary catheter–based therapy for acute decompensated systolic heart failure. The decision to treat patients in the intensive care unit was

Patient Characteristics

A total of 73 patients met the eligibility criteria during the study period. One patient was excluded because of poor echocardiographic windows, and another patient was excluded because of inadequate central venous pressure measurements. Overall, 123 hemodynamic measurements were performed (71 measurements at baseline and 52 measurements 48–72 hours after admission to the unit; in 19 patients, measurements were not repeated, because their clinical status improved to the point that the invasive

Discussion

The aim of any estimation is to decrease the initial uncertainty of the parameter assessed. In our study, the initial uncertainty range was decreased by only 8% using previously proposed methods, by 13% using linear regression analysis, and by 19% using a CART model. These improvements in uncertainty, although statistically significant, were modest and have limited clinical significance. In other words, prediction of RAP by echocardiography appears to have very limited precision in patients

Conclusions

In patients with advanced heart failure, the echocardiographic methods for evaluating RAP showed only modest precision. Furthermore, none of the previously proposed RAP prediction methods resulted in a clinically relevant improvement of RAP estimate precision. Estimating RAP from a single IVCd measurement was at least as precise as using proposed complex prediction methods. The CART algorithm detected a subgroup of patients with elevated RAP in 15% of cases but failed to differentiate between

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kenya Kusunose, MD, for his help with figure editing and Kathryn Brock, BA, for editing the manuscript.

References (25)

Cited by (38)

  • Echocardiographic evaluation of the right atrial size and function: Relevance for clinical practice

    2023, American Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and Practice
  • Clinical Utility of Superior Vena Cava Flow Velocity Waveform Measured from the Subcostal Window for Estimating Right Atrial Pressure

    2022, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
    Citation Excerpt :

    This could be due to changes in hepatic vein flow associated with parenchymal fibrosis in patients with organic hepatic disorders.28 Incorporation of these secondary indices to refine RAP estimates did not improve IVC measurement precision.11,26 Therefore, further investigation is required for more reliable and feasible RAP estimation methods.

  • The role of the renal resistance index in patients with heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction

    2021, Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Evaluation of cardiac and renal hemodynamics by direct pressure measurements with right-side catheter was not performed. Estimates of several parameters, such as CVP, may not be accurate [29]. While aortic valve disease may affect the values of RRI, subgroup analysis was not performed because of the small number of patients (2 patients with moderate or severe aortic regurgitation and 5 patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis).

  • VExUS Nexus: Bedside Assessment of Venous Congestion

    2021, Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease
View all citing articles on Scopus

This publication was made possible by the Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland, Grant No. UL1TR000439 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, and the National Institutes of Health Roadmap for Medical Research. Mr Borowski was funded by an American Society of Echocardiography sonographers’ grant.

View full text