EditorialDeveloping consensus on injury coding
References (29)
The Injury Severity Score of road traffic casualties in relation to mortality, time of death, hospital treatment time and disability
Accid Anal Prev
(1975)- et al.
A comparison of AIS-85 with AIS-80 for injury scaling in blunt trauma
Accid Anal Prev
(1990) - et al.
The value of trauma registries
Injury
(2008) - et al.
Double coding and mapping using Abbreviated Injury Scale 1998 and 2005: identifying issues for trauma data
Injury
(2010) - et al.
The Abbreviated Injury Scale: evolution, usage and future adaptability
Accid Anal Prev
(1981) - et al.
The impact of the AIS 2005 revision on injury severity scores and clinical outcome measures
Injury
(2009) - et al.
Scoring of anatomic injury after trauma: AIS 98 versus AIS 90—do the changes affect overall severity assessment?
Injury
(2007) - et al.
The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care
J Trauma
(1974) - et al.
Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score
J Trauma
(1987) - et al.
Developing Australia's first statewide trauma registry—what are the lessons?
Aust N Z J Surg
(2004)
An anatomical injury scale in multiple trauma victims
Ann Proc Am Assoc Automot Med
AIS-85 versus AIS-80: a comparison of scoring in penetrating trauma
Ann Proc Am Assoc Automot Med
Rating the severity of tissue damage. I. The abbreviated scale
JAMA
A comparison of Abbreviated Injury Scale 1980 and 1985 versions
J Trauma
Cited by (11)
A review of the revised Functional Capacity Index as a predictor of 12 month outcomes following injury
2017, InjuryCitation Excerpt :The scaled severities assigned to each code in the AIS were originally intended to reflect more than mortality [2]. However, it has been known (and re-iterated) since the 1970s that AIS severities are weighted towards the likelihood of mortality [2–5]. In high income countries where mature trauma systems have brought about significant reductions in mortality, there has been a shift away from focusing on mortality-driven outcomes towards quantifying the extent of morbidity amongst the large proportion of trauma victims who survive their injuries [6–9].
Quality of trauma care and trauma registries
2015, Medicina IntensivaEditorial
2014, InjuryAccuracy of single-pass whole-body computed tomography for detection of injuries in patients with major blunt trauma
2012, CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association JournalCitation Excerpt :These body regions are the same as those used in the calculation of the Injury Severity Score. Despite its limitations, the Injury Severity Score is the most common scoring system for anatomic injuries used worldwide.18,19 Injuries to two or more body regions and an Injury Severity Score greater than 15 indicates multiple trauma.
Revised Functional Capacity Index as a predictor of outcome following injury
2017, British Journal of SurgeryEvidence of data quality in trauma registries: A systematic review
2016, Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery