Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 82, Issue 10, October 2011, Pages 1279-1284
Resuscitation

Clinical paper
Tracheal rapid ultrasound exam (T.R.U.E.) for confirming endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and timeliness of using tracheal ultrasound to examine endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational study, conducted at the emergency department of a national university teaching hospital. Patients received emergency intubation because of impending respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, or severe trauma. The tracheal rapid ultrasound exam (T.R.U.E.) was performed during emergency intubation with the transducer placed transversely at the trachea over the suprasternal notch. Quantitative waveform capnography was used as the criterion standard for confirmation of tracheal intubation. The main outcome was the concordance between the T.R.U.E. and the capnography.

Results

A total of 112 patients were included in the analysis, and 17 (15.2%) had esophageal intubations. The overall accuracy of the T.R.U.E. was 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 93.7–99.5%). The kappa (κ) value was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.84–1.00), indicating a high degree of agreement between the T.R.U.E. and capnography. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the T.R.U.E. were 98.9% (95% CI: 94.3–99.8%), 94.1% (95% CI: 73.0–99.0%), 98.9% (95% CI: 94.3–99.8%) and 94.1% (95% CI: 73.0–99.0%). The median operating time of the T.R.U.E. was 9.0 s (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.0, 14.0).

Conclusions

The application of the T.R.U.E. to examine endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation is feasible, and can be rapidly performed.

Introduction

Establishing a secure airway in critically ill patients is a primary step during resuscitation. According to the 2010 Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines, adequate support of ventilation during resuscitation is essential.1 Proper endotracheal tube intubation provides definitive airway control. Nevertheless, unrecognized endotracheal tube misplacement can lead to significant mortality and morbidity, and is more likely to occur during emergent situations. The reported incidence of esophageal intubation was about 6–16% during emergency intubation.2, 3 Thus, early detection of accidental esophageal intubation is a primary focus during resuscitation.

Many traditional methods can be employed to confirm endotracheal tube placement, including direct visualization of the vocal cords, observation of chest movement, and chest and gastric auscultation. Each of these methods has limitations, and is not entirely reliable in the emergency setting.4, 5 Studies found that quantitative capnography is the most sensitive tool for confirming tracheal intubation.4, 5, 6 According to the 2010 ACLS guidelines, quantitative waveform capnography is recommended as the most reliable method for confirming endotracheal tube placement.1 However, capnography is still not widely available in some emergency departments (EDs) and intensive care units (ICUs).7 A confirmation technique that is widely available and accurate would be desirable when waveform capnography is not available.

Ultrasound is a common examination tool in many EDs and ICUs. To assist with airway management in critically ill patients, ultrasound is very useful due to its low-cost and portable capability.8 Several studies have provided promising results of the use of ultrasound for the confirmation of endotracheal tube placement in cadaveric models and in patients in well-controlled environments.9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Two recent studies showed up to 100% of sensitivity and specificity of tracheal ultrasound for endotracheal tube placement confirmation in live humans under a well-controlled operating room setting.14, 15 To date, few studies have been conducted in emergency settings, so that validation of this potentially useful technique in emergent situations is urgently needed.

We proposed a tracheal rapid ultrasound examination (T.R.U.E.) method for rapid and accurate confirmation of the endotracheal tube position during emergency intubation. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and timeliness of the T.R.U.E. in confirming endotracheal tube position during emergency intubation.

Section snippets

Study design and setting

This was a prospective, single-center, observational study, conducted between March 2010 and December 2010. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Taiwan University Hospital with a waiver of informed consents. All subjects were recruited from the ED of National Taiwan University Hospital, which is a 2000-bed, tertiary teaching hospital. The emergency department cares for more than 100,000 patients each year.

Selection of participants

Patients were prospectively enrolled during

Results

Of the 173 eligible patients, a total of 112 (64.7%) patients, with ages of 24–94 years old, were included in the final analyses, between March 2010 and December 2010 (Fig. 2). Their demographics and clinical characteristics are listed in Table 1. The mean age was 67.4 ± 17.6 years. The mean BMI was 23.1 ± 4.8 kg/m2. Among 112 patients, 18 out-of-hospital and 11 in-hospital cardiac arrest patients were intubated. The remaining 83 patients were intubated for other medical emergencies. The mean

Discussion

This prospective study aimed to assess accuracy and timeliness of tracheal ultrasound for determining endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation. In this study, tracheal ultrasound achieved high sensitivity and specificity for confirming endotracheal tube placement. Therefore, ultrasound can serve as a good diagnostic tool for confirming tracheal intubation during resuscitation.

According to the 2010 ACLS guidelines, endotracheal tube position should be verified by both clinical

Conclusions

This prospective study indicated that the application of the T.R.U.E. to examine endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation is feasible, and can be rapidly performed. Thus, tracheal ultrasound can be considered as the secondary confirmation method for endotracheal tube placement during resuscitation.

Conflicts of interest statement

None.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Fu-Chang Hu, MS, ScD, for suggestions for statistical analysis and assistance with statistical computing.

References (28)

  • S. Knapp et al.

    The assessment of four different methods to verify tracheal tube placement in the critical care setting

    Anesth Analg

    (1999)
  • N.M. Deiorio

    Continuous end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement is neither widely available nor consistently applied by emergency physicians

    Emerg Med J

    (2005)
  • A. Sustić

    Role of ultrasound in the airway management of critically ill patients

    Crit Care Med

    (2007)
  • D.T. Raphael et al.

    Ultrasound confirmation of endotracheal tube placement

    J Clin Ultrasound

    (1987)
  • Cited by (151)

    • Perioperative Point-of-Care Ultrasound

      2021, Advances in Anesthesia
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01148732.

    ☆☆

    A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.016.

    View full text