Simulation and educationQuality of chest compressions by Down syndrome people: A pilot trial☆
Introduction
In case of cardiac arrest, immediate initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by bystanders improves survival.1, 2 However, the number of laypeople who deliver first aid after witnessing an accident remains to be poor.3 Everyone should be informed and trained to detect a cardiac arrest victim and to immediately start good quality CPR as an essential link of the chain of survival.4
In recent years, many institutions have targeted efforts at training laypeople in compression-only CPR skills and have designed CPR training programs and resources to be applied in schools as well as in other settings.5, 6, 7 Brief videos have been used to train laypeople on the provision of compression-only CPR.5
Down syndrome (DS) is the most common genetic cause of intellectual disability. As a result of improvement in medicine, technology, and education, the life expectancy and quality of individuals with DS is nearly comparable to the general population in developed countries. Due to health and social policy strategies as well as multifaceted efforts DS citizens have increased their active presence in the society and try to gain integration. Offering DS individuals the same learning and training options as laypersons may be a good way of improving their self-steam and active role in society.8
Due to the fact that we were not aware of prior experiences about CPR training of DS people we designed the “Yes, we also can!” pilot trial. We hypothesized that DS young persons were capable of learning and performing quality chest compressions (CC) similarly to laypeople. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of young people with DS to perform good quality compression-only CPR in a manikin after a brief training supported by a brief funny video in comparison with university students. Primary endpoint was CC depth, CC rate and composite CC quality.
Section snippets
Study design and selection of participants
This study was designed as a prospective investigation and it was conducted in April 2014 in Galicia, Spain. The study sample was divided into two groups: experimental (DS) and control.
DS subjects: The participants were recruited at the Down Compostela Foundation. This is a not-for-profit organization where DS and other disabled people go for training and education to live independently. Currently, a total of 68 DS persons aged from newborn to adulthood use the facility. All DS persons older
Results
DS individuals had lower height and slightly higher BMI than controls (Table 1).
CC quality results are shown in Table 2. CC rate, percentage of shallow CC, and percentage of CC without complete release were significantly higher in DS subjects than in controls. Mean CC depth, percentage of CC delivered at recommended rate, and the percentage of the composite variable “full correct CC” were significantly lower in the experimental group than in controls. The applied work measured as CC rate × CC
Discussion
Layperson information and training is essential to increase bystander CPR rates and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcome.3 Although several training methods and programs have been implemented, we lack evidences about the best in terms of feasibility, usefulness and cost-efficiency. Hands-only CC is a proposed alternative to standard CPR for laypeople in witnessed unexpected cardiac arrest, because it delivers substantially more compressions per minute and may be easier to remember and perform.
Conclusions
After short instruction based on a brief video and hands-on session DS young people with mild or moderate intellectual disability and without physical disability were able to deliver CC but failed to achieve good CC quality.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to the present study.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank all the people (members, staff, families) of the Down Compostela Foundation.
References (27)
- et al.
An intention-focused paradigm for improving bystander CPR performance
Resuscitation
(2015) - et al.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 2 Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators
Resuscitation
(2010) - et al.
The impact of ultra-brief chest compression-only CPR video training on responsiveness, compression rate, and hands-off time interval among bystanders in a shopping mall
Resuscitation
(2014) - et al.
Effectiveness of a 30-min CPR self instruction program for lay responders: a controlled randomized study
Resuscitation
(2005) - et al.
How to become an under 11 rescuer: a practical method to teach first aid to primary schoolchildren
Resuscitation
(2005) - et al.
Quality of closed chest compression on a manikin in ambulance vehicles and flying helicopters with a real time automated feedback
Resuscitation
(2010) - et al.
Uninterrupted chest compression CPR is easier to perform and remember than standard CPR
Resuscitation
(2004) - et al.
Effectiveness of simplified chest compression-only CPR training for the general public: a randomized controlled trial
Resuscitation
(2008) - et al.
Push-fast recommendation on performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation causes excessive chest compression rates, a manikin model
Am J Emerg Med
(2014) - et al.
Excessive chest compression rate is associated with insufficient compression depth in prehospital cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(2012)
Death Before Disco: The Effectiveness of a Musical Metronome in Layperson Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training
J Emerg Med
“Stayin’ alive”: a novel mental metronome to maintain compression rates in simulated cardiac arrests
J Emerg Med
A popular song improves CPR compression rate and skill retention by schoolchildren: a manikin trial
Resuscitation
Cited by (10)
Basic life support training for people with disabilities. A scoping review
2023, Resuscitation PlusDown syndrome people capable of learning and performing foreign body airway obstruction treatment algorithm
2018, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
- ☆
A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.01.022.