Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 158, January 2021, Pages 41-48
Resuscitation

Clinical paper
Impact of perceived inappropiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation on emergency clinicians’ intention to leave the job: Results from a cross-sectional survey in 288 centres across 24 countries

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.10.043Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients with a poor prognosis increases the risk of perception of inappropriate care leading to moral distress in clinicians. We evaluated whether perception of inappropriate CPR is associated with intention to leave the job among emergency clinicians.

Methods

A cross-sectional multi-centre survey was conducted in 24 countries. Factors associated with intention to leave the job were analysed by conditional logistic regression models. Results are expressed as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Of 5099 surveyed emergency clinicians, 1836 (36.0%) were physicians, 1313 (25.7%) nurses, 1950 (38.2%) emergency medical technicians. Intention to leave the job was expressed by 1721 (33.8%) clinicians, 3403 (66.7%) often wondered about the appropriateness of a resuscitation attempt, 2955 (58.0%) reported moral distress caused by inappropriate CPR. After adjustment for other covariates, the risk of intention to leave the job was higher in clinicians often wondering about the appropriateness of a resuscitation attempt (1.43 [1.23−1.67]), experiencing associated moral distress (1.44 [1.24−1.66]) and who were between 30−44 years old (1.53 [1.21−1.92] compared to <30 years). The risk was lower when the clinician felt valued by the team (0.53 [0.42−0.66]), when the team leader acknowledged the efforts delivered by the team (0.61 [0.49−0.75]) and in teams that took time for debriefing (0.70 [0.60−0.80]).

Conclusion

Resuscitation attempts perceived as inappropriate by clinicians, and the accompanying moral distress, were associated with an increased likelihood of intention to leave the job. Interprofessional collaboration, teamwork, and regular interdisciplinary debriefing were associated with a lower risk of intention to leave the job.

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02356029

Introduction

The provision of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to patients with severe comorbidities and frailty has greatly increased since its first introduction more than 50 years ago. Data from the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry collected between 2001 and 2011 show a threefold increase in bystander CPR and of return of spontaneous circulation among patients 80 years or older, but at the same time a significant decline in 1-year survival.1 The incidence of CPR attempts in nursing homes also increased over the past several decades; in Denmark the incidence quadrupled from 3.5% in 2002 to 16.5% in 2014 while in Japan the proportion of cardiac arrests treated in nursing homes increased from approximately 12% to almost 20% in a time span of approximately 5 years.2, 3 In the largest series reported thus far, none of the 2575 resuscitated nursing home residents had a good 1-year functional recovery.4 Data from Japan and North America show that 13–20% of the resuscitated cardiac arrest patients are aged 73 years or older and have an unwitnessed cardiac arrest with a non-shockable rhythm, resulting in a favorable neurological outcome of 0.5% or even less.5, 6, 7 All these data suggest that patients often undergo resuscitation attempts without taking into account the dismal prognosis of the patient.

Inappropriate resuscitation attempts, defined as CPR attempts that are disproportionate to the expected prognosis of the patient in terms of survival or quality of life, are not only detrimental to patients, but can also cause moral distress to emergency clinicians. According to the definition provided by Jameton, moral distress is a challenge that arises when one knows the right thing to do ethically or medically, but institutional and external constraints make it nearly impossible to pursue the right course of action.8 Frequent exposure to similar patient care situations and/or a professional environment not acknowledging the distress may lead to deficient coping mechanisms and accumulation of moral distress. This may be associated with burn-out of the clinician and employee attrition, resulting in a decreased quality of care provided to current and future patients (Fig. 1).9, 10, 11, 12, 13

The purpose of this study was to determine whether frequent perception of inappropriateness of CPR and the presence of moral distress due to this perception are associated with intention to leave the job among clinicians working on prehospital and emergency department resuscitation teams. Secondary aims were to evaluate if the association differed according to the profession, age, and gender of the clinician.

Section snippets

Study design and participants

The REAPPROPRIATE study is an international multi-centre cross-sectional survey conducted in 24 countries (Austria, Belgium, Chile, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Israel, Japan, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Republic of Ireland, Romania, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States). The study population consisted of clinicians, defined as healthcare professionals working as caregivers for patients who are

Results

Of the 5882 clinicians participating, 5099 (86.7%) completed all selected survey items. Physicians, nurses, and emergency medical technicians (including paramedics) accounted for 1836 (36.0%), 1313 (25.7%) and 1950 (38.2%) of surveyed clinicians, respectively (Table 1).

Of the 5099 clinicians, 1721 (33.8%) responded that they had thoughts about leaving their current job, 3403 (66.7%) stated that they often wondered about the appropriateness of a resuscitation attempt, and 2955 (58.0%) reported

Discussion

In this large international multi-centre cross-sectional survey we found that 66.7% of clinicians working in prehospital and emergency department settings endorsed often questioning the appropriateness of a resuscitation attempt, and 58% reported moral distress in case of resuscitation attempts which they perceived as inappropriate. Moreover, we found that 33.8% of clinicians have thoughts about leaving their current job. The intention to leave the job was associated both with frequent

Conclusion

We found that resuscitation attempts perceived as inappropriate by clinicians, and the extent to which such attempts are reported to cause moral distress, is associated with increased likelihood of a clinician’s intention to leave the job. Interprofessional collaboration, teamwork, and regular interdisciplinary debriefing can potentially reduce the risk of staff attrition. It is paramount to decrease the number or duration of inappropriate resuscitation attempts through improved assessment of

Funding source

RP is supported by Fund Marie-Thérèse De Lava, King Baudouin Foundation, Belgium. DDB received a senior clinical investigators grant (1800513N) from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO).

Author contributions

PD, KM, RP, SH, PDP and DDB designed the study. All authors except JS and JD contributed to the final version of the survey. All authors except KM, RP, JS, PDP, JD and DDB contributed to the data collection. PD, KM, RP, JD, DDB and JS analysed and interpreted the data. JS performed the statistical analysis. PD did the literature search and wrote the first draft of the report. PD and JS structured the tables and figures. All authors reviewed the draft, contributed to the revision of the report

Conflicts of interest

CAB is employed by the Regional Competence Centre for Acute Medicine in Western Norway (RAKOS) with financial support from the Norwegian Directorate of Health. He has participated in Global Resuscitation Alliance meetings sponsored by the Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine, TrygFonden and EMS2018. CD is Deputy Medical Director of the National Ambulance Service of the Republic of Ireland. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The European Resuscitation Council Research Net was helpful in facilitating the European part of our research network. We are indebted to Bram Gadeyne who developed the secured survey website. National coordinators and collaborators are listed in Supplementary data Appendix C.

References (40)

  • L.L. Bossaert et al.

    European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: section 11. The ethics of resuscitation and end-of-life decisions

    Resuscitation

    (2015)
  • M. Wissenberg et al.

    Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in relation to age and early identification of patients with minimal chance of long-term survival

    Circulation

    (2015)
  • S. Okabayashi et al.

    Outcomes of patients 65 years or older after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest based on location of cardiac arrest in Japan

    JAMA Netw Open

    (2019)
  • A. Jameton

    Nursing practice: The ethical issues

    (1984)
  • R.D. Piers et al.

    Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians

    JAMA

    (2011)
  • D.S. Tawfik et al.

    Evidence relating health care provider burnout and quality of care

    Ann Intern Med

    (2019)
  • H. Jiang et al.

    Satisfaction, burnout and intention to stay of emergency nurses in Shanghai

    Emerg Med J

    (2017)
  • D. Lu et al.

    Impact of burnout on self-reported patient care among emergency physicians

    WestJEM

    (2015)
  • P.S. Jones et al.

    An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research

    Nurs Res

    (2001)
  • C.A. Marco et al.

    Ethical issues of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: current practice among emergency physicians

    Acad Emerg Med

    (1997)
  • Cited by (17)

    • Moral distress among healthcare professionals working in intensive care units in Spain

      2022, Medicina Intensiva
      Citation Excerpt :

      The feeling of inappropriateness about some aspects of critical care can further development of MD among ICU staff.9 Previous research in different health sectors found that this feeling has negative consequences for HCPs, teams and health systems.3,8,25 In view of the above, it is crucial to have valid and reliable tools to explore the causes of MD among HCPs in order to design effective interventions.10

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Please see Supplementary data, Appendix C for collaborators of the REAPPROPRIATE study group.

    View full text