Literature ReviewMachine Learning in Neuro-Oncology: Can Data Analysis From 5346 Patients Change Decision-Making Paradigms?
Introduction
Machine learning (ML) is a current application of artificial intelligence based on a field of computer science that gives computer systems the ability to learn from “big data,” without being explicitly programmed. This emerging data analysis method has been successfully used for optical character recognition, spam filtering, and face recognition. For example, support vector machines (SVMs) are learning algorithms used to perform analysis on a set of data and then provide classification. After inputting a data set of various training points with an example of each classification, the SVM ML-based algorithm (MLBA) can then group any new data provided into the various categories. Its application could be very useful in the field of medicine. The major benefit of ML is the propensity to analyze a large amount of nonlinear data to then allow for predictions to help guide medical decision-making. Thus, a shift is occurring from conventional statistical methods to ML to allow for more meaningful analysis of a greater amount of medical data, the so-called big data.
The use of ML to help guide neurosurgical care in areas such as preoperative planning, intraoperative guidance, neurophysiological monitoring, and neurosurgical outcome prediction has greatly increased in the past 5 years.1 The main concept in MLBAs is to use a sample data set and construct a mathematical model to allow for predictions without explicit programming. MLBAs can be divided into 2 broad categories: supervised learning or unsupervised learning. With supervised learning, the sample data set will incorporate both the input data and the desired output. With unsupervised learning, the data set only has the input without the output. Although detailed concepts of ML have been previously elucidated, the goal of the present study was to review specifically the application and use of ML in the field of neuro-oncology.
Section snippets
Search Strategy and Data Extraction
The present systematic review and meta-analysis complied with the PRISMA-IPD (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Individual Participant Data) guidelines.2 The PubMed database was searched for English-language studies reported from January 30, 2000 to March 31, 2018. The MeSH terms used were “neurosurgery,” “machine learning,” “glioma,” “spine,” “prediction,” “support vector machine,” “Bayesian network,” “decision tree,” “data mining,” and “neural network,”
Results
The 29 included studies had used data from 5346 patients to develop MLBAs in neuro-oncology (Figure 2A). These 29 studies implemented ML techniques in neuro-oncology. The increase in the number of studies and patients was significant between 2015 and 2016 (P < 0.05), with a subsequent plateau (Figure 2B). The most commonly used MLBA was SVM (Table 1).
Discussion
ML has the theoretical advantage of providing an accurate and fast interpretation of complex data and overcoming possible human error and/or bias. Our review has shown that its application in neuro-oncology has 3 major categories: predicting patient outcomes, analyzing imaging findings, and predicting gene expression. The current limitations of MLBAs have been reviewed previously.32
Our review yielded 12 studies that had used MLBAs to predict patient outcomes, with 9 studies investigating
Conclusions
ML has the theoretical advantage to provide accurate and fast interpretation of complex data, overcoming possible human error and/or bias. With the advances in the field of ML from handcrafted features to automatic feature engineering, the accuracy of the models will certainly increase. MLBAs in neuro-oncology have shown to predict patient outcomes more accurately than conventional parameters on retrospective analysis. Additionally, if their high diagnostic accuracy in imaging analysis and
References (32)
- et al.
Constraint based temporal event sequence mining for glioblastoma survival prediction
J Biomed Inform
(2016) - et al.
Comparison of perioperative automated versus manual two-dimensional tumor analysis in glioblastoma patients
Eur J Radiol
(2017) - et al.
MRI features predict p53 status in lower-grade gliomas via a machine-learning approach
NeuroImage Clin
(2018) A systematic review on machine learning in neurosurgery: the future of decision-making in patient care
Turk Neurosurg
(2018)- et al.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
BMJ
(2009) - et al.
A generic support vector machine model for preoperative glioma survival associations
Radiology
(2015) - et al.
Imaging patterns predict patient survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma via machine learning techniques
Neuro Oncol
(2016) - et al.
Survival analysis of patients with high-grade gliomas based on data mining of imaging variables
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
(2012) - et al.
A deep learning-based radiomics model for prediction of survival in glioblastoma multiforme
Sci Rep
(2017) - et al.
A fully-automatic multiparametric radiomics model: towards reproducible and prognostic imaging signature for prediction of overall survival in glioblastoma multiforme
Sci Rep
(2017)
Outcome prediction for patient with high-grade gliomas from brain functional and structural networks
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv
3D deep learning for multi-modal imaging-guided survival time prediction of brain tumor patients
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv
Glioma survival prediction with the combined analysis of in vivo 11C-MET-PET, ex vivo and patient features by supervised machine learning
J Nucl Med
Stereotactic radiotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer brain metastases patients
J Ovarian Res
Survival of patients with multiple intracranial metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: does the number of tumors matter?
Am J Clin Oncol
Analysis of risk factors to predict communicating hydrocephalus following gamma knife radiosurgery for intracranial schwannoma
Cancer Med
Cited by (32)
Fundamental principles of machine learning for neurologists
2023, Pratique Neurologique - FMCEnhancing sepsis management through machine learning techniques: A review
2022, Medicina IntensivaCitation Excerpt :There are applications of ML to almost all medical fields. Some recent reviews of the use of ML in several medical areas have been published, including medical image analysis,32 cardiovascular medicine,33 in critical care,34 or neuro oncology.35 The main objective of this work is to conduct a narrative review to provide an overview of how specific ML techniques can be used to improve sepsis management, focusing on the following specific tasks: detection, prediction of sepsis/shock, mortality prediction, hospital stay, costs and adherence to guides.
Machine learning workflow for the oil uptake prediction of rice flour in a batter-coated fried system
2021, Innovative Food Science and Emerging TechnologiesCitation Excerpt :Therefore, more thorough analysis incorporating multiple physicochemical features rather than focusing on a single variable is necessary to comprehensively understand the oil uptake of fried foods. Artificial intelligence (AI) indicates human intelligence exhibited by machines (Bini, 2018) and machine learning is a subset of AI that can make systems have the ability to automatically learn and improve from data without being explicitly programmed (Sarkiss & Germano, 2019). It is no doubt that machine learning as the most innovative technology is being exploited in a wide variety of fields, rapidly transforming industries and societies across the world.
Noninterpretive Uses of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology
2021, Academic RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Deep learning has also been used in attempts to identify MR features that could help classify molecular subtypes of [89,90] and estimate patient prognosis in [91] patients with intracranial gliomas. A systematic review in neuro-oncology found that AI models could predict patient outcomes such as survival with higher accuracy than conventional staging and clinical risk parameters [92]. For instance, AI can predict prognosis in patients with high-grade glioma with accuracies of 91% [93].
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Christopher A. Sarkiss and Isabelle M. Germano are co–first authors.