was read the article
array:22 [ "pii" => "S2173572716300480" "issn" => "21735727" "doi" => "10.1016/j.medine.2016.10.001" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-11-01" "aid" => "982" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. y SEMICYUC" "copyrightAnyo" => "2016" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "sco" "cita" => "Med Intensiva. 2016;40:461-2" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 1720 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 175 "HTML" => 1014 "PDF" => 531 ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S2173572716300492" "issn" => "21735727" "doi" => "10.1016/j.medine.2016.06.001" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-11-01" "aid" => "947" "copyright" => "The Authors" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Med Intensiva. 2016;40:463-73" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 1706 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 168 "HTML" => 929 "PDF" => 609 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Psychometric validation of the behavioral indicators of pain scale for the assessment of pain in mechanically ventilated and unable to self-report critical care patients" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "463" "paginaFinal" => "473" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Validación psicométrica de la Escala de Conductas Indicadoras de Dolor para la medición de dolor en pacientes críticos, no comunicativos y sometidos a ventilación mecánica" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 3117 "Ancho" => 2298 "Tamanyo" => 642318 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0095" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Study flow chart.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "I. Latorre-Marco, M. Acevedo-Nuevo, M. Solís-Muñoz, L. Hernández-Sánchez, C. López-López, M.M. Sánchez-Sánchez, M. Wojtysiak-Wojcicka, J. de las Pozas-Abril, G. Robleda-Font, M.J. Frade-Mera, R. De Blas-García, C. Górgolas-Ortiz, J. De la Figuera-Bayón, C. Cavia-García" "autores" => array:14 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "I." "apellidos" => "Latorre-Marco" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Acevedo-Nuevo" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Solís-Muñoz" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "L." "apellidos" => "Hernández-Sánchez" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "López-López" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M.M." "apellidos" => "Sánchez-Sánchez" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Wojtysiak-Wojcicka" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "de las Pozas-Abril" ] 8 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "G." "apellidos" => "Robleda-Font" ] 9 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M.J." "apellidos" => "Frade-Mera" ] 10 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "R." "apellidos" => "De Blas-García" ] 11 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Górgolas-Ortiz" ] 12 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "De la Figuera-Bayón" ] 13 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Cavia-García" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173572716300492?idApp=WMIE" "url" => "/21735727/0000004000000008/v1_201611050100/S2173572716300492/v1_201611050100/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:11 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Editorial</span>" "titulo" => "Pain in the ICU – The fifth sign, not the fifth element" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "461" "paginaFinal" => "462" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "autoresLista" => "C. Chamorro" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Chamorro" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "carlos.chamorroj@salud.madrid.org" ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario de Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Dolor en la UCI: el quinto signo, no el quinto elemento" ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There are many potential causes for pain in critically ill patients during their ICU stay. Pain usually results from the primary disease process and tissue injury, invasive procedures, endotracheal suctioning, immobility, turning and mobilization. If not recognized and treated, pain may have a significant negative impact on patient outcomes. Pain activates the autonomic nervous system, can cause hemodynamic and respiratory dysfunction, and lead to coagulopathy or immune system dysfunction.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> Sustained painful stimuli may result in hyperalgesia and spinal sensitization. A heightened sensitivity to pain by spinal neurons may cause an amplified response to minimally noxious stimuli or even transmission of pain without painful stimuli, leading to chronic pain. In addition to the physiologic and other psychological effects, the memory of pain during intensive care admission is an independent predictor for the development of posttraumatic stress disorder. Conversely, although the consequences of inadequate pain control are significant, overuse of analgesics may also lead to unwanted side effects, such as gastrointestinal hypomotility, constipation, gastric bleeding, renal dysfunction, tolerance and risk for developing withdrawal symptoms. A systematic process of treating and assessing pain is associated with a decreased incidence of pain, use of analgesics, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of stay on the ICU.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a></p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Despite this evidence, pain remains a major stressor in the ICU, as reported by nearly half of the survivors of an ICU episode.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> Chronic pain is increasingly being recognized as a sequel in survivors of critical illness that negatively affects quality of life.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> Also, a great and similar proportion of patients report dissatisfaction with their pain control, irrespective of being medical, surgical or trauma cases.</p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It goes without saying, that if a patient complains or the attending physician detects pain, analgesia is provided. Therefore, what are the possible causes explaining the magnitude of this problem in spite of all the above? Apparently, the answer is easy; pain is either inadequately treated or not properly detected. The latter aspect reflects an important handicap of critically ill patients and derives from the definition of pain itself. As expressed by the International Association for the Study of Pain, this phenomenon is described in subjective terms as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage”. As pain is complex and subjective, the patient's self-report remains the gold standard for its detection and evaluation of response to therapy. This highlights the problem of the detection of pain in the ICU, as opportunities for communication and self-reporting of pain are often limited in critically ill intubated and sedated patients. Although in recent years patients are sedated more lightly, many of them still have difficulties expressing their pain level.</p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Vital signs alone have been shown to be poor indicators of pain, although acute changes should prompt evaluation with a validated pain assessment tool. Other physiologic measures of pain are being explored and seem promising techniques for further research, like pupillometry and changes in Bispectral Index or processed EEG signals. Several studies suggest that certain patient behaviors, such as different facial responses and body movements, may reveal the presence of pain. Family caregivers may help in the identification of pain-related behaviors and should be more involved in the ICU pain assessment process. International guidelines recommend assessing pain with behavioral parameters whenever critically ill patients are unable to report their pain level. Two of the most commonly recommended tools are the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and the Critical Pain Observation Tool (CPOT). Both have shown good validity and reliability in international studies. The BPS consists of three domains: “facial expression”, “upper limb movement”, and “mechanical ventilator compliance”.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0025"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> Each domain is rated from one to four, with a composite score ranging from 3 to 12. A score of 5 or higher indicates pain, and higher scores denote an increase in pain intensity. The CPOT takes into account four behavioral categories: “facial expression”, “body movements”, “muscle tension”, and “mechanical ventilator compliance”.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> Each component is scored, with a possible punctuation of 0–2 and a total score of 0–8. A score of 3 or higher represents pain.</p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Modern analgesia-sedation strategies propose concepts like “adaptive sedation” or “dynamic sedation”, focusing on titrating the depth of sedation to the patients’ changing clinical situation, i.e. at a given time patients may be awake and cooperative or need more sedation, without being able to communicate. This is another obstacle for adequately evaluating intensity and evolution of pain. In the cooperative patient, self-reporting scales are recommended, such as the Visual Analog Scale and the Numeric Rating Scale, both ranging from 0 (“no pain”) to 10 (“worst pain imaginable”). However in non-cooperative patients, recommended scales range from 0 to 8 or 3 to 12 points. Therefore, for a particular patient, the same number represents different intensities of pain, depending on the level of consciousness. To avoid this possible confusion, the Analgesia and Sedation Working Group of the SEMICYUC<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> recommended in 2006 using the Campbell scale ranged between 0 and 10. However this scale never has been validated. Latorre Marco et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> in 2011 designed and validated a new scale, the Behavioral Indicators of Pain Scale (ESCID), which ranges between 0 and 10 points, with 5 behavioral categories: “facial expression”, “body movements”, “muscle tension”, “mechanical ventilator compliance” and “consolability”, which could decrease the artifacts due to causes unrelated to pain and, therefore, has advantages over other scales mentioned above.</p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In this issue of the journal, Latorre-Marco et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> report on the validation of ESCID in a larger sample of 286 patients from 14 hospitals and different ICUs, including medical and surgical patients. For this purpose the authors have used a remarkable scientific and meticulous method. Pain was assessed using two scales, BPS and ESCID, simultaneously applied by two independent observers who were blinded to each other's assessments. Observations coincided with the application of two routine care procedures previously recognized as painful: turning/repositioning and endotracheal suctioning. The authors have found a high correlation between ESCID and BPS as well as a high intra-rater and inter-rater concordance. The ESCID scale demonstrated a high internal consistency in its five domains.</p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The verification of the validity of ESCID as a behavioral scale for monitoring pain in non-communicative critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation represents a significant progress in the detection and management of pain in this patient group and we congratulate the authors for that. However it is necessary to remark some limitations of this study, mainly the exclusion of some critically ill patients who are also unable to report their pain level, such as mechanically ventilated patients with either suspicion or diagnosis of delirium, neurological disease with a score <4 in the motor item of the Glasgow Coma Scale, severe polyneuropathy and under treatment with neuromuscular blocking drugs. Therefore, we should keep walking in the path to find the best way to detect and measure the pain in these patient groups.</p><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Pain should no longer be the mysterious “fifth element”, like in the synonymous movie picture, where its existence is only discovered at the end, in this case, after discharge the patient from the ICU. In the mid-1990s, the American Pain Society aggressively pushed the concept of pain as the fifth vital sign.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0050"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> This sign must be assessed and treated with the use of pain assessment scales as a quality-healthcare indicator. We now have another powerful tool at our disposal.</p></span>" "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:10 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0005" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Effect of analgesic treatment on the physiological consequences of acute pain" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "K.S. Lewis" 1 => "J.K. Whipple" 2 => "K.A. Michael" 3 => "E.J. Quebbeman" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Hosp Pharm" "fecha" => "1994" "volumen" => "51" "paginaInicial" => "1539" "paginaFinal" => "1554" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8092155" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0010" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Pain assessment is associated with decreased duration of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: a post hoc analysis of the DOLOREA study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "colaboracion" => "DOLOREA Investigators" "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "J.F. Payen" 1 => "J.L. Bosson" 2 => "G. Chanques" 3 => "J. Mantz" 4 => "J. Labarere" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c0d4f0" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Anesthesiology" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "111" "paginaInicial" => "1308" "paginaFinal" => "1316" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19934877" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0015" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Pain and fear" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "C. Chamorro" 1 => "M.A. Romera" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Med Intensiva" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "39" "paginaInicial" => "442" "paginaFinal" => "444" ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0020" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Long-term outcome in ICU patients: what about quality of life?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "F. García Lizana" 1 => "D. Peres Bota" 2 => "M. De Cubber" 3 => "J.L. Vincent" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00134-003-1875-z" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Intensive Care Med" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "29" "paginaInicial" => "1286" "paginaFinal" => "1293" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12851765" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0025" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients by using a behavioral pain scale" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J.F. Payen" 1 => "O. Bru" 2 => "J.L. Bosson" 3 => "A. Lagrasta" 4 => "E. Novel" 5 => "I. Deschaux" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Crit Care Med" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "29" "paginaInicial" => "2258" "paginaFinal" => "2263" ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0030" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "C. Gelinas" 1 => "L. Fillion" 2 => "K.A. Puntillo" 3 => "C. Viens" 4 => "M. Fortier" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Crit Care" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "15" "paginaInicial" => "420" "paginaFinal" => "427" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16823021" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0035" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Monitoring pain: recommendations of the Analgesia and Sedation Work Group of SEMICYUC" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "colaboracion" => "Analgesia and Sedation Work Group of SEMICYUC" "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "C. Pardo" 1 => "T. Muñoz" 2 => "C. Chamorro" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Med Intensiva" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "30" "paginaInicial" => "379" "paginaFinal" => "385" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129536" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0040" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Validation of the Scale of Behavior Indicators of Pain (ESCID) in critically ill, non-communicative patients under mechanical ventilation: results of the ESCID scale" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "I. Latorre Marco" 1 => "M. Solís Muñoz" 2 => "T. Falero Ruiz" 3 => "A. Larrasquitu Sánchez" 4 => "A.B. Romay Pérez" 5 => "I. Millán Santos" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Enferm Intensiva" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "22" "paginaInicial" => "3" "paginaFinal" => "12" ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0045" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Psychometric validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Pain Scale for the assessment of pain in mechanically ventilated and unable to self-report critical care patients" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "I. Latorre-Marco" 1 => "M. Acevedo-Nuevo" 2 => "M. Solís-Muñoz" 3 => "L. Hernández-Sánchez" 4 => "C. López-López" 5 => "M. Sánchez-Sánchez" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:2 [ "tituloSerie" => "Med Intensiva" "fecha" => "2016" ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0050" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Quality improvement guidelines for the treatment of acute pain and cancer pain" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "colaboracion" => "American Pain Society Quality of Care Committee" "etal" => false ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "JAMA" "fecha" => "1995" "volumen" => "274" "paginaInicial" => "1874" "paginaFinal" => "1880" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7500539" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/21735727/0000004000000008/v1_201611050100/S2173572716300480/v1_201611050100/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => null "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/21735727/0000004000000008/v1_201611050100/S2173572716300480/v1_201611050100/en/main.pdf?idApp=WMIE&text.app=https://medintensiva.org/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173572716300480?idApp=WMIE" ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 November | 7 | 10 | 17 |
2024 October | 40 | 47 | 87 |
2024 September | 41 | 41 | 82 |
2024 August | 47 | 43 | 90 |
2024 July | 32 | 34 | 66 |
2024 June | 40 | 46 | 86 |
2024 May | 44 | 35 | 79 |
2024 April | 38 | 38 | 76 |
2024 March | 42 | 31 | 73 |
2024 February | 23 | 38 | 61 |
2024 January | 33 | 39 | 72 |
2023 December | 37 | 42 | 79 |
2023 November | 37 | 36 | 73 |
2023 October | 22 | 25 | 47 |
2023 September | 29 | 25 | 54 |
2023 August | 20 | 18 | 38 |
2023 July | 30 | 23 | 53 |
2023 June | 26 | 29 | 55 |
2023 May | 24 | 39 | 63 |
2023 April | 31 | 20 | 51 |
2023 March | 28 | 36 | 64 |
2023 February | 39 | 38 | 77 |
2023 January | 20 | 17 | 37 |
2022 December | 26 | 29 | 55 |
2022 November | 51 | 30 | 81 |
2022 October | 40 | 36 | 76 |
2022 September | 23 | 38 | 61 |
2022 August | 28 | 41 | 69 |
2022 July | 22 | 29 | 51 |
2022 June | 34 | 22 | 56 |
2022 May | 30 | 28 | 58 |
2022 April | 31 | 25 | 56 |
2022 March | 50 | 40 | 90 |
2022 February | 34 | 24 | 58 |
2022 January | 49 | 28 | 77 |
2021 December | 54 | 43 | 97 |
2021 November | 57 | 38 | 95 |
2021 October | 82 | 67 | 149 |
2021 September | 45 | 29 | 74 |
2021 August | 41 | 37 | 78 |
2021 July | 41 | 44 | 85 |
2021 June | 44 | 26 | 70 |
2021 May | 99 | 57 | 156 |
2021 April | 210 | 111 | 321 |
2021 March | 113 | 34 | 147 |
2021 February | 89 | 22 | 111 |
2021 January | 48 | 27 | 75 |
2020 December | 55 | 36 | 91 |
2020 November | 49 | 62 | 111 |
2020 October | 55 | 53 | 108 |
2020 September | 40 | 20 | 60 |
2020 August | 39 | 33 | 72 |
2020 July | 45 | 19 | 64 |
2020 June | 32 | 14 | 46 |
2020 May | 42 | 9 | 51 |
2020 April | 46 | 20 | 66 |
2020 March | 12 | 16 | 28 |
2020 February | 44 | 57 | 101 |
2020 January | 27 | 26 | 53 |
2019 December | 30 | 20 | 50 |
2019 November | 40 | 28 | 68 |
2019 October | 20 | 14 | 34 |
2019 September | 17 | 15 | 32 |
2019 August | 17 | 10 | 27 |
2019 July | 30 | 20 | 50 |
2019 June | 15 | 14 | 29 |
2019 May | 40 | 23 | 63 |
2019 April | 18 | 9 | 27 |
2019 March | 26 | 24 | 50 |
2019 February | 20 | 30 | 50 |
2019 January | 25 | 24 | 49 |
2018 December | 29 | 27 | 56 |
2018 November | 76 | 49 | 125 |
2018 October | 81 | 22 | 103 |
2018 September | 38 | 6 | 44 |
2018 August | 12 | 8 | 20 |
2018 July | 23 | 6 | 29 |
2018 June | 33 | 3 | 36 |
2018 May | 23 | 6 | 29 |
2018 April | 56 | 6 | 62 |
2018 March | 36 | 4 | 40 |
2018 February | 43 | 9 | 52 |
2018 January | 19 | 7 | 26 |
2017 December | 43 | 2 | 45 |
2017 November | 12 | 9 | 21 |
2017 October | 15 | 7 | 22 |
2017 September | 9 | 3 | 12 |
2017 August | 13 | 4 | 17 |
2017 July | 16 | 6 | 22 |
2017 June | 14 | 12 | 26 |
2017 May | 15 | 12 | 27 |
2017 April | 24 | 15 | 39 |
2017 March | 16 | 8 | 24 |
2017 February | 11 | 0 | 11 |
2017 January | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2016 November | 4 | 3 | 7 |