array:23 [
  "pii" => "S2173572717300097"
  "issn" => "21735727"
  "doi" => "10.1016/j.medine.2017.02.006"
  "estado" => "S300"
  "fechaPublicacion" => "2017-01-01"
  "aid" => "1014"
  "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. y SEMICYUC"
  "copyrightAnyo" => "2016"
  "documento" => "article"
  "crossmark" => 1
  "subdocumento" => "sco"
  "cita" => "Med Intensiva. 2017;41:41-3"
  "abierto" => array:3 [
    "ES" => true
    "ES2" => true
    "LATM" => true
  ]
  "gratuito" => true
  "lecturas" => array:2 [
    "total" => 1740
    "formatos" => array:3 [
      "EPUB" => 139
      "HTML" => 1057
      "PDF" => 544
    ]
  ]
  "itemSiguiente" => array:18 [
    "pii" => "S2173572717300103"
    "issn" => "21735727"
    "doi" => "10.1016/j.medine.2017.02.007"
    "estado" => "S300"
    "fechaPublicacion" => "2017-01-01"
    "aid" => "1013"
    "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. y SEMICYUC"
    "documento" => "article"
    "crossmark" => 1
    "subdocumento" => "ssu"
    "cita" => "Med Intensiva. 2017;41:44-52"
    "abierto" => array:3 [
      "ES" => true
      "ES2" => true
      "LATM" => true
    ]
    "gratuito" => true
    "lecturas" => array:2 [
      "total" => 2280
      "formatos" => array:3 [
        "EPUB" => 165
        "HTML" => 1069
        "PDF" => 1046
      ]
    ]
    "en" => array:13 [
      "idiomaDefecto" => true
      "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Review</span>"
      "titulo" => "Microcirculatory monitoring in septic patients: Where do we stand?"
      "tienePdf" => "en"
      "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en"
      "tieneResumen" => array:2 [
        0 => "en"
        1 => "es"
      ]
      "paginas" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "paginaInicial" => "44"
          "paginaFinal" => "52"
        ]
      ]
      "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [
        "es" => array:1 [
          "titulo" => "Monitorizando la microcirculación en el paciente séptico: ¿en qué punto estamos?"
        ]
      ]
      "contieneResumen" => array:2 [
        "en" => true
        "es" => true
      ]
      "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [
        "en" => true
      ]
      "contienePdf" => array:1 [
        "en" => true
      ]
      "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [
        "original" => 0
        "multimedia" => array:7 [
          "identificador" => "fig0010"
          "etiqueta" => "Figure 2"
          "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA"
          "mostrarFloat" => true
          "mostrarDisplay" => false
          "figura" => array:1 [
            0 => array:4 [
              "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg"
              "Alto" => 560
              "Ancho" => 1500
              "Tamanyo" => 160214
            ]
          ]
          "descripcion" => array:1 [
            "en" => "<p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Cytocam-Incident Dark Field (IDF) images of sublingual microcirculation. <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Image A</span>: early phase septic shock patient. A decrease of vessel density and of perfused vessels, and an increase of non-perfused/under-perfused vessels can be observed. Although not appreciable in static images, heterogeneity of microvascular blood flow velocity between coexisting areas is also present (normal or high microvascular blood flow vessels in close vicinity to non-perfused or low microvascular blood flow vessels). <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Image B</span>: healthy volunteer. A normal vessel density and proportion of perfused vessels can be observed. Although not appreciable in static images, microvascular blood flow velocity is normal and homogeneous overall the studied areas. (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Images courtesy of Braedius Medical and Prof. D. Payen, H. Lariboisiere</span>).</p>"
          ]
        ]
      ]
      "autores" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "autoresLista" => "G. Gruartmoner, J. Mesquida, C. Ince"
          "autores" => array:3 [
            0 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "G."
              "apellidos" => "Gruartmoner"
            ]
            1 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "J."
              "apellidos" => "Mesquida"
            ]
            2 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "C."
              "apellidos" => "Ince"
            ]
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "idiomaDefecto" => "en"
    "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173572717300103?idApp=WMIE"
    "url" => "/21735727/0000004100000001/v1_201703040056/S2173572717300103/v1_201703040056/en/main.assets"
  ]
  "itemAnterior" => array:18 [
    "pii" => "S2173572717300085"
    "issn" => "21735727"
    "doi" => "10.1016/j.medine.2017.02.005"
    "estado" => "S300"
    "fechaPublicacion" => "2017-01-01"
    "aid" => "917"
    "copyright" => "Elsevier Espa&#241;a&#44; S&#46;L&#46;U&#46; y SEMICYUC"
    "documento" => "article"
    "crossmark" => 1
    "subdocumento" => "sco"
    "cita" => "Med Intensiva. 2017;41:38-40"
    "abierto" => array:3 [
      "ES" => true
      "ES2" => true
      "LATM" => true
    ]
    "gratuito" => true
    "lecturas" => array:2 [
      "total" => 1871
      "formatos" => array:3 [
        "EPUB" => 159
        "HTML" => 1113
        "PDF" => 599
      ]
    ]
    "en" => array:11 [
      "idiomaDefecto" => true
      "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Point of view</span>"
      "titulo" => "New definition of sepsis and septic shock: What does it give us?"
      "tienePdf" => "en"
      "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en"
      "paginas" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "paginaInicial" => "38"
          "paginaFinal" => "40"
        ]
      ]
      "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [
        "es" => array:1 [
          "titulo" => "Nueva definición de sepsis y <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">shock</span> séptico: ¿qué nos ofrece?"
        ]
      ]
      "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [
        "en" => true
      ]
      "contienePdf" => array:1 [
        "en" => true
      ]
      "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [
        "original" => 0
        "multimedia" => array:7 [
          "identificador" => "fig0005"
          "etiqueta" => "Figure 1"
          "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA"
          "mostrarFloat" => true
          "mostrarDisplay" => false
          "figura" => array:1 [
            0 => array:4 [
              "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg"
              "Alto" => 1514
              "Ancho" => 1500
              "Tamanyo" => 145657
            ]
          ]
          "descripcion" => array:1 [
            "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The &#8220;CHAOS Theory&#8221; concepts.</p>"
          ]
        ]
      ]
      "autores" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "autoresLista" => "A. Rodríguez, I. Martín-Loeches, J.C. Yébenes"
          "autores" => array:3 [
            0 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "A."
              "apellidos" => "Rodríguez"
            ]
            1 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "I."
              "apellidos" => "Martín-Loeches"
            ]
            2 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "J.C."
              "apellidos" => "Yébenes"
            ]
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "idiomaDefecto" => "en"
    "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173572717300085?idApp=WMIE"
    "url" => "/21735727/0000004100000001/v1_201703040056/S2173572717300085/v1_201703040056/en/main.assets"
  ]
  "en" => array:15 [
    "idiomaDefecto" => true
    "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Point of view</span>"
    "titulo" => "The new definitions of SEPSIS and SEPTIC SHOCK: What do they give us? An answer"
    "tieneTextoCompleto" => true
    "paginas" => array:1 [
      0 => array:2 [
        "paginaInicial" => "41"
        "paginaFinal" => "43"
      ]
    ]
    "autores" => array:1 [
      0 => array:3 [
        "autoresLista" => "M. Singer"
        "autores" => array:1 [
          0 => array:3 [
            "nombre" => "M."
            "apellidos" => "Singer"
            "email" => array:1 [
              0 => "m.singer@ucl.ac.uk"
            ]
          ]
        ]
        "afiliaciones" => array:1 [
          0 => array:2 [
            "entidad" => "University College London, London, UK"
            "identificador" => "aff0005"
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [
      "es" => array:1 [
        "titulo" => "Las nuevas definiciones de SEPSIS y CHOQUE SÉPTICO: ¿Qué nos ofrecen? Una respuesta"
      ]
    ]
    "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Can I thank Dr Rodriguez and colleagues<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> for engendering debate and discussion on the new Sepsis-3 definitions.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> This is a valuable exercise not only to raise queries and thoughts, but also to clarify misconceptions. Below, using a combination of science and data, I shall gently pick apart each of their assertions to demonstrate the flaws and inconsistencies in their arguments.</p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The main reason why SIRS was not included in the operationalization of the new sepsis definition was actually based on pathophysiology. The SIRS criteria are not particularly good in distinguishing a normal and appropriate host response to an infection from an inappropriate response resulting in a more serious infection. A bad cold will thus qualify as &#8216;sepsis&#8217; in the old terminology if accompanied, for example, by fever &#62;38<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>&deg;C and a heart rate above 90<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>bpm. The new definition however describes a dysregulated, life-threatening host response that results in organ dysfunction. Whereas few patients die from a cold, despite having two or more SIRS criteria, a SOFA score &#8805;2 related to the acute episode does indeed represent organ dysfunction and is associated with a &#62;10% risk of dying.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a></p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The semantic argument posed by Rodriguez et al. of 7-in-8 patients admitted to ICU with infection-related organ failure having SIRS misses the point. Rather, the 1-in-8 who did not have the requisite SIRS criteria would not have qualified as having sepsis under the old definition despite having infection-related organ failure serious enough to require critical care, and to result in death in 16%.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> By comparison, the new criteria are necessarily all-inclusive as these mandate new onset organ dysfunction.</p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The Bone paradigms have served a useful purpose but are now outdated. There was complete consensus among the Task Force, which specifically included many experts in sepsis pathophysiology, that sepsis represents much, much more than just an inflammatory (pro- and anti-) response. The failure of multiple immunomodulatory trials is testament to this fact. We surely need to take into account other pathways (metabolic, hormonal, bioenergetics, endothelial, etc.) responsible for producing organ dysfunction and not focus simply upon inflammation.</p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Dr Rodriguez and colleagues cite studies that relate the number of SIRS criteria to mortality risk. However, a rise in mortality from 7% to 17% for patients having 2 as opposed to the maximum 4 SIRS criteria does not match up to the difference in mortality ranging from 18% for 1 organ dysfunction, progressing stepwise to 68% for 5 organ dysfunctions.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> Furthermore, the mortality risk relating to the number of SIRS criteria in emergency room and ward patients is approximately three times lower than the equivalent SIRS score in ICU patients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> A mortality risk predicated on organ dysfunction (using SOFA, LODS or qSOFA) is far more consistent, nothwithstanding the patient&#39;s hospital location.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a></p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I am unaware of any hospital using SIRS criteria alone to trigger a Sepsis Code activation. If so, the poor ward response teams would be overwhelmed with multiple emergency referrals, running to see most hospital patients with a raised white count and a temperature above 38.3 &deg;C! Many such patients are not infected,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> let alone need unnecessary antibiotics. With increasing concerns about antibiotic resistance and the need for good stewardship, we must be circumspect in throwing antibiotics around needlessly. Basing antibiotic prescriptions on SIRS criteria alone is thus worrisome. All major studies, e.g. the Surviving Sepsis Campaign registry<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0135"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> and the Spanish multicentre before-after educational program study,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0140"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> have focused on patients admitted to critical care rather than general ward patients. Such patients already had organ dysfunction to merit ICU admission.</p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is also important to stress that the sepsis definitions, and the criteria that describe them, are not intended to dictate clinical management. A sick, hypotensive yet fluid-resuscitated patient requiring vasopressors should not be treated any differently if his lactate is 2.1 (fulfilling the new septic shock criteria) rather than 1.9 (not &#8216;septic shock&#8217;). Likewise, manifestations of organ dysfunction, e.g. hypotension, oliguria, dyspnoea, should obviously be actively treated without waiting for the clinician to perform a formal SOFA score and then proclaiming &#8216;Eureka&#8217;.</p><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The advantage of the SOFA score for operationalizing sepsis is that it utilizes simple physiological and biochemical tests that should be routinely performed in any sick patient where the clinician is concerned about organ dysfunction. However, the timing of SOFA scoring should be retrospective for coding, research and epidemiology purposes, and after the presumptive diagnosis of infection has been confirmed or refuted. We have offered a much more robust categorization than previously provided. This is sorely needed to improve upon a highly inconsistent epidemiology where sepsis and septic shock means different things to different people. This heterogeneity results in widely differing incidences and mortality rates. Such spurious differences impacts on epidemiology, quality improvement programs, and clinical trial design.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0145"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a></p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I would also challenge the notion that international guideline campaigns implemented around the previous definitions have &#8220;dramatically decreased&#8221; mortality. These claims usually rely either on complicated statistical manipulations or huge increases in the denominator with a corresponding dilutional effect &#8211; the Will Rogers Phenomenon. For example, one US study reported a fall in severe sepsis mortality from 40% to 27% between 2000 and 2007.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> Yet, in the same period the number of cases of severe sepsis rose massively from 300,270 to 781,725, and the actual number of total deaths nearly doubled. A similar national ICD-10 database study has recently been published from Germany;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11</span></a> in seven years (from 2007 to 2013) mortality from severe sepsis and septic shock fell from 49.5% to 43.6% yet the number of cases tripled and total deaths also doubled. Hardly the claimed &#8220;dramatic decrease&#8221; Dr Rodriguez and colleagues attest! Correcting for illness severity, there has been some improvement in mortality over time, as shown by recent Australasian<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> and UK national data,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> yet this improvement is less marked for sepsis than for patients with non-septic critical illness (Shankar-Hari M., personal communication).</p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">With respect to quickSOFA can I respectfully suggest the authors read the detail provided in both the main definitions paper<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> and the accompanying paper by Seymour et al.?<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> Twenty-eight commonly collected physiological and biochemical variables (including the SIRS criteria and lactate) were evaluated; regression analysis identified the three qSOFA criteria as the best determinants of mortality risk, and a respiratory rate cut-off of 22<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>breaths/min was superior to the SIRS respiratory rate cut-off of 20. Unlike the totally arbitrary selection by Bone et al. of the SIRS cut-offs,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12</span></a> qSOFA was developed from data collected on hundreds of thousands of patients. They also misunderstand the point of qSOFA: we wrote that &#8220;<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">adult patients with suspected infection can be rapidly identified</span> (with qSOFA) <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">as being more likely to have poor outcomes typical of sepsis</span>.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a>&#8221; We were also at pains to stress in the paper that qSOFA is <span class="elsevierStyleUnderline">not</span> part of the new definition of sepsis, as re-emphasized in a recent editorial,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0165"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> but &#8220;<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">be used to prompt clinicians to further investigate for organ dysfunction, to initiate or escalate therapy as appropriate, and to consider referral to critical care or increase the frequency of monitoring, if such actions have not already been undertaken. The task force considered that positive qSOFA criteria should also prompt consideration of possible infection in patients not previously recognized as infected.</span>&#8221;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> We also wrote &#8220;<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">It is crucial, however, that failure to meet 2 or more qSOFA or SOFA criteria should not lead to a deferral of investigation or treatment of infection or to a delay in any other aspect of care deemed necessary by the practitioners&#8221;</span>.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> The beauty of qSOFA &#8211; acknowledging that it does need prospective validation in different healthcare settings &#8211; is that it can be performed by any healthcare practitioner at the bedside in just 1&#8211;2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min &#8211; unlike SIRS testing that requires an intrinsic delay of even several hours while blood tests are performed to measure white count and PaCO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>.</p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I would also remind Dr Rodriguez and colleagues that all the studies claiming benefit from &#8220;essential therapeutic measures such as early administration of antibiotics&#8221; were all performed on patients with existing organ dysfunction, if not full-blown shock. The &#8216;essential&#8217; nature of this particular argument is also challenged and undermined by a recent metaanalysis<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0170"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a> and even more recent prospective studies contesting this particular dogma.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15,16</span></a> What is truth, indeed?</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Finally, they question the new clinical characterization of septic shock. I would sincerely hope that hyperlactataemia persisting after initial resuscitation does not define a terminal event, as Rodriguez and colleagues suggest. From the Surviving Sepsis Campaign registry of 28,150 patients admitted to ICUs with infection-related organ failure and adequate fluid-resuscitation, upon which we based our criteria, mortality was 42.3% in patients having both hypotension (MAP<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>&#60;<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>65<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mmHg) and persisting hyperlactataemia (&#62;2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mmol/l).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> Mortality was considerably lower in patients meeting only one or none of these criteria, i.e. 25.7% with hyperlactataemia alone, 30.1% with fluid-resistant hypotension alone, and 25% with organ dysfunction despite a normal lactate and blood pressure. The &#8216;unexpected low mortality&#8217; they note in recent clinical septic shock trials is actually not unexpected when the criteria used to define shock in these trials are more closely examined. Take for instance, the Early Goal-Directed Therapy studies where a lactate &#62;4 irrespective of fluid resuscitation, or refractory hypotension (systolic BP<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>&#60;<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>90<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm Hg or MAP<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>&#60;<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>65<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm Hg despite resuscitation with at least 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>l of intravenous fluid) determined study inclusion.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0190"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18&#8211;20</span></a> &#8216;Shock&#8217; in many of these patients was rapidly reversed with fluid alone and did not need vasopressors, mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy. However, only 15&#8211;20% of patients entered into these trials fulfilled the much tighter clinical criteria required by the new septic shock definition. Our systematic review showed multiple criteria have been used in the literature to describe septic shock.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> This however generated a ten-fold variation in incidence and a four-fold variation in mortality. We thus need to talk the same language to make sensible national, international or temporal comparisons.</p><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0005">Funding</span><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">None declared.</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Conflicts of interest</span><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">None declared.</p></span></span>"
    "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [
      "secciones" => array:4 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "sec0025"
          "titulo" => "Funding"
        ]
        1 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "sec0030"
          "titulo" => "Conflicts of interest"
        ]
        2 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "xack271159"
          "titulo" => "Acknowledgements"
        ]
        3 => array:1 [
          "titulo" => "References"
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf"
    "tienePdf" => true
    "fechaRecibido" => "2016-10-17"
    "fechaAceptado" => "2016-10-23"
    "bibliografia" => array:2 [
      "titulo" => "References"
      "seccion" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "bibs0005"
          "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:20 [
            0 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0105"
              "etiqueta" => "1"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:3 [
                  "comentario" => "(in press)"
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "New definition of SEPSIS and SEPTIC SHOCK: what gives us?"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:3 [
                            0 => "A. Rodr&iacute;guez"
                            1 => "I. Mart&iacute;n-Loeches"
                            2 => "J.C. Y&eacute;benes"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:2 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "MedIntensiva"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            1 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0110"
              "etiqueta" => "2"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "The third international consensus definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "M. Singer"
                            1 => "C.S. Deutschman"
                            2 => "C.W. Seymour"
                            3 => "M. Shankar-Hari"
                            4 => "D. Annane"
                            5 => "M. Bauer"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "J Am Med Assoc"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "volumen" => "315"
                        "paginaInicial" => "801"
                        "paginaFinal" => "810"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            2 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0115"
              "etiqueta" => "3"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000&#8211;2012"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:5 [
                            0 => "K.M. Kaukonen"
                            1 => "M. Bailey"
                            2 => "S. Suzuki"
                            3 => "D. Pilcher"
                            4 => "R. Bellomo"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "J Am Med Assoc"
                        "fecha" => "2014"
                        "volumen" => "311"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1308"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1316"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            3 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0120"
              "etiqueta" => "4"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:3 [
                  "comentario" => "(in press)"
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Differences in impact of definitional elements on mortality precludes international comparisons of sepsis epidemiology-a cohort study illustrating the need for standardized reporting"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:3 [
                            0 => "M. Shankar-Hari"
                            1 => "D.A. Harrison"
                            2 => "K.M. Rowan"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1097/01.CCM.0000055402.68581.DC"
                      "Revista" => array:3 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Crit Care Med"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12626981"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            4 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0125"
              "etiqueta" => "5"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "C.W. Seymour"
                            1 => "V.X. Liu"
                            2 => "T.J. Iwashyna"
                            3 => "F.M. Brunkhorst"
                            4 => "T.D. Rea"
                            5 => "A. Scherag"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "J Am Med Assoc"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "volumen" => "315"
                        "paginaInicial" => "762"
                        "paginaFinal" => "774"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            5 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0130"
              "etiqueta" => "6"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Incidence and prognostic value of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunctions in ward patients"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:5 [
                            0 => "M.M. Churpek"
                            1 => "F.J. Zadravecz"
                            2 => "C. Winslow"
                            3 => "M.D. Howell"
                            4 => "D.P. Edelson"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1164/rccm.201502-0275OC"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Am J Respir Crit Care Med"
                        "fecha" => "2015"
                        "volumen" => "192"
                        "paginaInicial" => "958"
                        "paginaFinal" => "964"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26158402"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            6 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0135"
              "etiqueta" => "7"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "The surviving sepsis campaign bundles and outcome: results from the International Multicentre Prevalence Study on Sepsis (the IMPreSS study)"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "A. Rhodes"
                            1 => "G. Phillips"
                            2 => "R. Beale"
                            3 => "M. Cecconi"
                            4 => "J.-D. Chiche"
                            5 => "D. De Backer"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1007/s00134-015-3906-y"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Intensive Care Med"
                        "fecha" => "2015"
                        "volumen" => "41"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1620"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1628"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109396"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            7 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0140"
              "etiqueta" => "8"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "R. Ferrer"
                            1 => "A. Artigas"
                            2 => "M.M. Levy"
                            3 => "J. Blanco"
                            4 => "G. Gonz&aacute;lez-D&iacute;az"
                            5 => "J. Garnacho-Montero"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "J Am Med Assoc"
                        "fecha" => "2008"
                        "volumen" => "299"
                        "paginaInicial" => "2294"
                        "paginaFinal" => "2303"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            8 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0145"
              "etiqueta" => "9"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Diagnosing sepsis is subjective and highly variable: a survey of intensivists using case vignettes"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "C. Rhee"
                            1 => "S.S. Kadri"
                            2 => "R.L. Danner"
                            3 => "A.F. Suffredini"
                            4 => "A.F. Massaro"
                            5 => "B.T. Kitch"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1186/s13054-016-1266-9"
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Crit Care"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "volumen" => "20"
                        "paginaInicial" => "89"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27048508"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            9 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0150"
              "etiqueta" => "10"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000&#8211;2007)"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "G. Kumar"
                            1 => "N. Kumar"
                            2 => "A. Taneja"
                            3 => "T. Kaleekal"
                            4 => "S. Tarima"
                            5 => "E. McGinley"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1378/chest.11-0352"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Chest"
                        "fecha" => "2011"
                        "volumen" => "140"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1223"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1231"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21852297"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            10 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0155"
              "etiqueta" => "11"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Hospital incidence and mortality rates of sepsis"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "C. Fleischmann"
                            1 => "D.O. Thomas-Rueddel"
                            2 => "M. Hartmann"
                            3 => "C.S. Hartog"
                            4 => "T. Welte"
                            5 => "S. Heublein"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.3238/arztebl.2016.0159"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Dtsch Arztebl Int"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "volumen" => "113"
                        "paginaInicial" => "159"
                        "paginaFinal" => "166"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27010950"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            11 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0160"
              "etiqueta" => "12"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "R.C. Bone"
                            1 => "R.A. Balk"
                            2 => "F.B. Cerra"
                            3 => "R.P. Dellinger"
                            4 => "A.M. Fein"
                            5 => "W.A. Knaus"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Chest"
                        "fecha" => "1992"
                        "volumen" => "101"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1644"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1655"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1303622"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            12 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0165"
              "etiqueta" => "13"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "qSOFA does not replace SIRS in the definition of sepsis"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:3 [
                            0 => "J.-L. Vincent"
                            1 => "G.S. Martin"
                            2 => "M.M. Levy"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1186/s13054-016-1389-z"
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Crit Care"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "volumen" => "20"
                        "paginaInicial" => "210"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27423462"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            13 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0170"
              "etiqueta" => "14"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "The impact of timing of antibiotics on outcomes in severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:5 [
                            0 => "S.A. Sterling"
                            1 => "W.R. Miller"
                            2 => "J. Pryor"
                            3 => "M.A. Puskarich"
                            4 => "A.E. Jones"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1097/CCM.0000000000001142"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Crit Care Med"
                        "fecha" => "2015"
                        "volumen" => "43"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1907"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1915"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26121073"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            14 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0175"
              "etiqueta" => "15"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "The association between time to antibiotics and relevant clinical outcomes in emergency department patients with various stages of sepsis: a prospective multi-center study"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "B. de Groot"
                            1 => "A. Ansems"
                            2 => "D.H. Gerling"
                            3 => "D. Rijpsma"
                            4 => "P. van Amstel"
                            5 => "D. Linzel"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1186/s13054-015-0936-3"
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Crit Care"
                        "fecha" => "2015"
                        "volumen" => "19"
                        "paginaInicial" => "194"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25925412"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            15 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0180"
              "etiqueta" => "16"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Gram-negative bacteraemia; a multi-centre prospective evaluation of empiric antibiotic therapy and outcome in English acute hospitals"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "J.M. Fitzpatrick"
                            1 => "J.S. Biswas"
                            2 => "J.D. Edgeworth"
                            3 => "J. Islam"
                            4 => "N. Jenkins"
                            5 => "R. Judge"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1016/j.cmi.2015.10.034"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Clin Microbiol Infect"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "volumen" => "22"
                        "paginaInicial" => "244"
                        "paginaFinal" => "251"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26577143"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            16 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0185"
              "etiqueta" => "17"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3)"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "M. Shankar-Hari"
                            1 => "G.S. Phillips"
                            2 => "M.L. Levy"
                            3 => "C.W. Seymour"
                            4 => "V.X. Liu"
                            5 => "C.S. Deutschman"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "J Am Med Assoc"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "volumen" => "315"
                        "paginaInicial" => "775"
                        "paginaFinal" => "787"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            17 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0190"
              "etiqueta" => "18"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "colaboracion" => "The ProCESS Investigators"
                          "etal" => false
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1056/NEJMoa1401602"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "N Engl J Med"
                        "fecha" => "2014"
                        "volumen" => "370"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1683"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1693"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24635773"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            18 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0195"
              "etiqueta" => "19"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "S.L. Peake"
                            1 => "A. Delaney"
                            2 => "M. Bailey"
                            3 => "R. Bellomo"
                            4 => "ARISE Investigators"
                            5 => "ANZICS Clinical Trials Group"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1056/NEJMoa1404380"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "N Engl J Med"
                        "fecha" => "2014"
                        "volumen" => "371"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1496"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1506"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25272316"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            19 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0200"
              "etiqueta" => "20"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "P.R. Mouncey"
                            1 => "T.M. Osborn"
                            2 => "G.S. Power"
                            3 => "D.A. Harrison"
                            4 => "M.Z. Sadique"
                            5 => "R.D. Grieve"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1056/NEJMoa1500896"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "N Engl J Med"
                        "fecha" => "2015"
                        "volumen" => "372"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1301"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1311"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25776532"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "agradecimientos" => array:1 [
      0 => array:4 [
        "identificador" => "xack271159"
        "titulo" => "Acknowledgements"
        "texto" => "<p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">None declared.</p>"
        "vista" => "all"
      ]
    ]
  ]
  "idiomaDefecto" => "en"
  "url" => "/21735727/0000004100000001/v1_201703040056/S2173572717300097/v1_201703040056/en/main.assets"
  "Apartado" => array:4 [
    "identificador" => "64269"
    "tipo" => "SECCION"
    "en" => array:2 [
      "titulo" => "Pont of view"
      "idiomaDefecto" => true
    ]
    "idiomaDefecto" => "en"
  ]
  "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/21735727/0000004100000001/v1_201703040056/S2173572717300097/v1_201703040056/en/main.pdf?idApp=WMIE&text.app=https://medintensiva.org/"
  "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173572717300097?idApp=WMIE"
]
Share
Journal Information

Statistics

Follow this link to access the full text of the article

Point of view
The new definitions of SEPSIS and SEPTIC SHOCK: What do they give us? An answer
Las nuevas definiciones de SEPSIS y CHOQUE SÉPTICO: ¿Qué nos ofrecen? Una respuesta
M. Singer
University College London, London, UK
Read
8672
Times
was read the article
2917
Total PDF
5755
Total HTML
Share statistics
 array:23 [
  "pii" => "S2173572717300097"
  "issn" => "21735727"
  "doi" => "10.1016/j.medine.2017.02.006"
  "estado" => "S300"
  "fechaPublicacion" => "2017-01-01"
  "aid" => "1014"
  "copyright" => "Elsevier Espa&#241;a&#44; S&#46;L&#46;U&#46; y SEMICYUC"
  "copyrightAnyo" => "2016"
  "documento" => "article"
  "crossmark" => 1
  "subdocumento" => "sco"
  "cita" => "Med Intensiva. 2017;41:41-3"
  "abierto" => array:3 [
    "ES" => true
    "ES2" => true
    "LATM" => true
  ]
  "gratuito" => true
  "lecturas" => array:2 [
    "total" => 1740
    "formatos" => array:3 [
      "EPUB" => 139
      "HTML" => 1057
      "PDF" => 544
    ]
  ]
  "itemSiguiente" => array:18 [
    "pii" => "S2173572717300103"
    "issn" => "21735727"
    "doi" => "10.1016/j.medine.2017.02.007"
    "estado" => "S300"
    "fechaPublicacion" => "2017-01-01"
    "aid" => "1013"
    "copyright" => "Elsevier Espa&#241;a&#44; S&#46;L&#46;U&#46; y SEMICYUC"
    "documento" => "article"
    "crossmark" => 1
    "subdocumento" => "ssu"
    "cita" => "Med Intensiva. 2017;41:44-52"
    "abierto" => array:3 [
      "ES" => true
      "ES2" => true
      "LATM" => true
    ]
    "gratuito" => true
    "lecturas" => array:2 [
      "total" => 2280
      "formatos" => array:3 [
        "EPUB" => 165
        "HTML" => 1069
        "PDF" => 1046
      ]
    ]
    "en" => array:13 [
      "idiomaDefecto" => true
      "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Review</span>"
      "titulo" => "Microcirculatory monitoring in septic patients: Where do we stand?"
      "tienePdf" => "en"
      "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en"
      "tieneResumen" => array:2 [
        0 => "en"
        1 => "es"
      ]
      "paginas" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "paginaInicial" => "44"
          "paginaFinal" => "52"
        ]
      ]
      "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [
        "es" => array:1 [
          "titulo" => "Monitorizando la microcirculación en el paciente séptico: ¿en qué punto estamos?"
        ]
      ]
      "contieneResumen" => array:2 [
        "en" => true
        "es" => true
      ]
      "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [
        "en" => true
      ]
      "contienePdf" => array:1 [
        "en" => true
      ]
      "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [
        "original" => 0
        "multimedia" => array:7 [
          "identificador" => "fig0010"
          "etiqueta" => "Figure 2"
          "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA"
          "mostrarFloat" => true
          "mostrarDisplay" => false
          "figura" => array:1 [
            0 => array:4 [
              "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg"
              "Alto" => 560
              "Ancho" => 1500
              "Tamanyo" => 160214
            ]
          ]
          "descripcion" => array:1 [
            "en" => "<p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Cytocam-Incident Dark Field (IDF) images of sublingual microcirculation. <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Image A</span>: early phase septic shock patient. A decrease of vessel density and of perfused vessels, and an increase of non-perfused/under-perfused vessels can be observed. Although not appreciable in static images, heterogeneity of microvascular blood flow velocity between coexisting areas is also present (normal or high microvascular blood flow vessels in close vicinity to non-perfused or low microvascular blood flow vessels). <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Image B</span>: healthy volunteer. A normal vessel density and proportion of perfused vessels can be observed. Although not appreciable in static images, microvascular blood flow velocity is normal and homogeneous overall the studied areas. (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Images courtesy of Braedius Medical and Prof. D. Payen, H. Lariboisiere</span>).</p>"
          ]
        ]
      ]
      "autores" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "autoresLista" => "G. Gruartmoner, J. Mesquida, C. Ince"
          "autores" => array:3 [
            0 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "G."
              "apellidos" => "Gruartmoner"
            ]
            1 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "J."
              "apellidos" => "Mesquida"
            ]
            2 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "C."
              "apellidos" => "Ince"
            ]
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "idiomaDefecto" => "en"
    "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173572717300103?idApp=WMIE"
    "url" => "/21735727/0000004100000001/v1_201703040056/S2173572717300103/v1_201703040056/en/main.assets"
  ]
  "itemAnterior" => array:18 [
    "pii" => "S2173572717300085"
    "issn" => "21735727"
    "doi" => "10.1016/j.medine.2017.02.005"
    "estado" => "S300"
    "fechaPublicacion" => "2017-01-01"
    "aid" => "917"
    "copyright" => "Elsevier Espa&#241;a&#44; S&#46;L&#46;U&#46; y SEMICYUC"
    "documento" => "article"
    "crossmark" => 1
    "subdocumento" => "sco"
    "cita" => "Med Intensiva. 2017;41:38-40"
    "abierto" => array:3 [
      "ES" => true
      "ES2" => true
      "LATM" => true
    ]
    "gratuito" => true
    "lecturas" => array:2 [
      "total" => 1871
      "formatos" => array:3 [
        "EPUB" => 159
        "HTML" => 1113
        "PDF" => 599
      ]
    ]
    "en" => array:11 [
      "idiomaDefecto" => true
      "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Point of view</span>"
      "titulo" => "New definition of sepsis and septic shock: What does it give us?"
      "tienePdf" => "en"
      "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en"
      "paginas" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "paginaInicial" => "38"
          "paginaFinal" => "40"
        ]
      ]
      "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [
        "es" => array:1 [
          "titulo" => "Nueva definición de sepsis y <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">shock</span> séptico: ¿qué nos ofrece?"
        ]
      ]
      "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [
        "en" => true
      ]
      "contienePdf" => array:1 [
        "en" => true
      ]
      "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [
        "original" => 0
        "multimedia" => array:7 [
          "identificador" => "fig0005"
          "etiqueta" => "Figure 1"
          "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA"
          "mostrarFloat" => true
          "mostrarDisplay" => false
          "figura" => array:1 [
            0 => array:4 [
              "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg"
              "Alto" => 1514
              "Ancho" => 1500
              "Tamanyo" => 145657
            ]
          ]
          "descripcion" => array:1 [
            "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The &#8220;CHAOS Theory&#8221; concepts.</p>"
          ]
        ]
      ]
      "autores" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "autoresLista" => "A. Rodríguez, I. Martín-Loeches, J.C. Yébenes"
          "autores" => array:3 [
            0 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "A."
              "apellidos" => "Rodríguez"
            ]
            1 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "I."
              "apellidos" => "Martín-Loeches"
            ]
            2 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "J.C."
              "apellidos" => "Yébenes"
            ]
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "idiomaDefecto" => "en"
    "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173572717300085?idApp=WMIE"
    "url" => "/21735727/0000004100000001/v1_201703040056/S2173572717300085/v1_201703040056/en/main.assets"
  ]
  "en" => array:15 [
    "idiomaDefecto" => true
    "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Point of view</span>"
    "titulo" => "The new definitions of SEPSIS and SEPTIC SHOCK: What do they give us? An answer"
    "tieneTextoCompleto" => true
    "paginas" => array:1 [
      0 => array:2 [
        "paginaInicial" => "41"
        "paginaFinal" => "43"
      ]
    ]
    "autores" => array:1 [
      0 => array:3 [
        "autoresLista" => "M. Singer"
        "autores" => array:1 [
          0 => array:3 [
            "nombre" => "M."
            "apellidos" => "Singer"
            "email" => array:1 [
              0 => "m.singer@ucl.ac.uk"
            ]
          ]
        ]
        "afiliaciones" => array:1 [
          0 => array:2 [
            "entidad" => "University College London, London, UK"
            "identificador" => "aff0005"
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [
      "es" => array:1 [
        "titulo" => "Las nuevas definiciones de SEPSIS y CHOQUE SÉPTICO: ¿Qué nos ofrecen? Una respuesta"
      ]
    ]
    "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Can I thank Dr Rodriguez and colleagues<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> for engendering debate and discussion on the new Sepsis-3 definitions.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> This is a valuable exercise not only to raise queries and thoughts, but also to clarify misconceptions. Below, using a combination of science and data, I shall gently pick apart each of their assertions to demonstrate the flaws and inconsistencies in their arguments.</p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The main reason why SIRS was not included in the operationalization of the new sepsis definition was actually based on pathophysiology. The SIRS criteria are not particularly good in distinguishing a normal and appropriate host response to an infection from an inappropriate response resulting in a more serious infection. A bad cold will thus qualify as &#8216;sepsis&#8217; in the old terminology if accompanied, for example, by fever &#62;38<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>&deg;C and a heart rate above 90<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>bpm. The new definition however describes a dysregulated, life-threatening host response that results in organ dysfunction. Whereas few patients die from a cold, despite having two or more SIRS criteria, a SOFA score &#8805;2 related to the acute episode does indeed represent organ dysfunction and is associated with a &#62;10% risk of dying.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a></p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The semantic argument posed by Rodriguez et al. of 7-in-8 patients admitted to ICU with infection-related organ failure having SIRS misses the point. Rather, the 1-in-8 who did not have the requisite SIRS criteria would not have qualified as having sepsis under the old definition despite having infection-related organ failure serious enough to require critical care, and to result in death in 16%.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> By comparison, the new criteria are necessarily all-inclusive as these mandate new onset organ dysfunction.</p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The Bone paradigms have served a useful purpose but are now outdated. There was complete consensus among the Task Force, which specifically included many experts in sepsis pathophysiology, that sepsis represents much, much more than just an inflammatory (pro- and anti-) response. The failure of multiple immunomodulatory trials is testament to this fact. We surely need to take into account other pathways (metabolic, hormonal, bioenergetics, endothelial, etc.) responsible for producing organ dysfunction and not focus simply upon inflammation.</p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Dr Rodriguez and colleagues cite studies that relate the number of SIRS criteria to mortality risk. However, a rise in mortality from 7% to 17% for patients having 2 as opposed to the maximum 4 SIRS criteria does not match up to the difference in mortality ranging from 18% for 1 organ dysfunction, progressing stepwise to 68% for 5 organ dysfunctions.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> Furthermore, the mortality risk relating to the number of SIRS criteria in emergency room and ward patients is approximately three times lower than the equivalent SIRS score in ICU patients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> A mortality risk predicated on organ dysfunction (using SOFA, LODS or qSOFA) is far more consistent, nothwithstanding the patient&#39;s hospital location.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a></p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I am unaware of any hospital using SIRS criteria alone to trigger a Sepsis Code activation. If so, the poor ward response teams would be overwhelmed with multiple emergency referrals, running to see most hospital patients with a raised white count and a temperature above 38.3 &deg;C! Many such patients are not infected,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> let alone need unnecessary antibiotics. With increasing concerns about antibiotic resistance and the need for good stewardship, we must be circumspect in throwing antibiotics around needlessly. Basing antibiotic prescriptions on SIRS criteria alone is thus worrisome. All major studies, e.g. the Surviving Sepsis Campaign registry<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0135"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> and the Spanish multicentre before-after educational program study,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0140"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> have focused on patients admitted to critical care rather than general ward patients. Such patients already had organ dysfunction to merit ICU admission.</p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is also important to stress that the sepsis definitions, and the criteria that describe them, are not intended to dictate clinical management. A sick, hypotensive yet fluid-resuscitated patient requiring vasopressors should not be treated any differently if his lactate is 2.1 (fulfilling the new septic shock criteria) rather than 1.9 (not &#8216;septic shock&#8217;). Likewise, manifestations of organ dysfunction, e.g. hypotension, oliguria, dyspnoea, should obviously be actively treated without waiting for the clinician to perform a formal SOFA score and then proclaiming &#8216;Eureka&#8217;.</p><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The advantage of the SOFA score for operationalizing sepsis is that it utilizes simple physiological and biochemical tests that should be routinely performed in any sick patient where the clinician is concerned about organ dysfunction. However, the timing of SOFA scoring should be retrospective for coding, research and epidemiology purposes, and after the presumptive diagnosis of infection has been confirmed or refuted. We have offered a much more robust categorization than previously provided. This is sorely needed to improve upon a highly inconsistent epidemiology where sepsis and septic shock means different things to different people. This heterogeneity results in widely differing incidences and mortality rates. Such spurious differences impacts on epidemiology, quality improvement programs, and clinical trial design.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0145"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a></p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I would also challenge the notion that international guideline campaigns implemented around the previous definitions have &#8220;dramatically decreased&#8221; mortality. These claims usually rely either on complicated statistical manipulations or huge increases in the denominator with a corresponding dilutional effect &#8211; the Will Rogers Phenomenon. For example, one US study reported a fall in severe sepsis mortality from 40% to 27% between 2000 and 2007.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> Yet, in the same period the number of cases of severe sepsis rose massively from 300,270 to 781,725, and the actual number of total deaths nearly doubled. A similar national ICD-10 database study has recently been published from Germany;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11</span></a> in seven years (from 2007 to 2013) mortality from severe sepsis and septic shock fell from 49.5% to 43.6% yet the number of cases tripled and total deaths also doubled. Hardly the claimed &#8220;dramatic decrease&#8221; Dr Rodriguez and colleagues attest! Correcting for illness severity, there has been some improvement in mortality over time, as shown by recent Australasian<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> and UK national data,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> yet this improvement is less marked for sepsis than for patients with non-septic critical illness (Shankar-Hari M., personal communication).</p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">With respect to quickSOFA can I respectfully suggest the authors read the detail provided in both the main definitions paper<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> and the accompanying paper by Seymour et al.?<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> Twenty-eight commonly collected physiological and biochemical variables (including the SIRS criteria and lactate) were evaluated; regression analysis identified the three qSOFA criteria as the best determinants of mortality risk, and a respiratory rate cut-off of 22<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>breaths/min was superior to the SIRS respiratory rate cut-off of 20. Unlike the totally arbitrary selection by Bone et al. of the SIRS cut-offs,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12</span></a> qSOFA was developed from data collected on hundreds of thousands of patients. They also misunderstand the point of qSOFA: we wrote that &#8220;<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">adult patients with suspected infection can be rapidly identified</span> (with qSOFA) <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">as being more likely to have poor outcomes typical of sepsis</span>.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a>&#8221; We were also at pains to stress in the paper that qSOFA is <span class="elsevierStyleUnderline">not</span> part of the new definition of sepsis, as re-emphasized in a recent editorial,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0165"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> but &#8220;<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">be used to prompt clinicians to further investigate for organ dysfunction, to initiate or escalate therapy as appropriate, and to consider referral to critical care or increase the frequency of monitoring, if such actions have not already been undertaken. The task force considered that positive qSOFA criteria should also prompt consideration of possible infection in patients not previously recognized as infected.</span>&#8221;<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> We also wrote &#8220;<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">It is crucial, however, that failure to meet 2 or more qSOFA or SOFA criteria should not lead to a deferral of investigation or treatment of infection or to a delay in any other aspect of care deemed necessary by the practitioners&#8221;</span>.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> The beauty of qSOFA &#8211; acknowledging that it does need prospective validation in different healthcare settings &#8211; is that it can be performed by any healthcare practitioner at the bedside in just 1&#8211;2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min &#8211; unlike SIRS testing that requires an intrinsic delay of even several hours while blood tests are performed to measure white count and PaCO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>.</p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I would also remind Dr Rodriguez and colleagues that all the studies claiming benefit from &#8220;essential therapeutic measures such as early administration of antibiotics&#8221; were all performed on patients with existing organ dysfunction, if not full-blown shock. The &#8216;essential&#8217; nature of this particular argument is also challenged and undermined by a recent metaanalysis<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0170"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a> and even more recent prospective studies contesting this particular dogma.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15,16</span></a> What is truth, indeed?</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Finally, they question the new clinical characterization of septic shock. I would sincerely hope that hyperlactataemia persisting after initial resuscitation does not define a terminal event, as Rodriguez and colleagues suggest. From the Surviving Sepsis Campaign registry of 28,150 patients admitted to ICUs with infection-related organ failure and adequate fluid-resuscitation, upon which we based our criteria, mortality was 42.3% in patients having both hypotension (MAP<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>&#60;<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>65<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mmHg) and persisting hyperlactataemia (&#62;2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mmol/l).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> Mortality was considerably lower in patients meeting only one or none of these criteria, i.e. 25.7% with hyperlactataemia alone, 30.1% with fluid-resistant hypotension alone, and 25% with organ dysfunction despite a normal lactate and blood pressure. The &#8216;unexpected low mortality&#8217; they note in recent clinical septic shock trials is actually not unexpected when the criteria used to define shock in these trials are more closely examined. Take for instance, the Early Goal-Directed Therapy studies where a lactate &#62;4 irrespective of fluid resuscitation, or refractory hypotension (systolic BP<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>&#60;<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>90<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm Hg or MAP<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>&#60;<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>65<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm Hg despite resuscitation with at least 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>l of intravenous fluid) determined study inclusion.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0190"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18&#8211;20</span></a> &#8216;Shock&#8217; in many of these patients was rapidly reversed with fluid alone and did not need vasopressors, mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy. However, only 15&#8211;20% of patients entered into these trials fulfilled the much tighter clinical criteria required by the new septic shock definition. Our systematic review showed multiple criteria have been used in the literature to describe septic shock.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> This however generated a ten-fold variation in incidence and a four-fold variation in mortality. We thus need to talk the same language to make sensible national, international or temporal comparisons.</p><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0005">Funding</span><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">None declared.</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Conflicts of interest</span><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">None declared.</p></span></span>"
    "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [
      "secciones" => array:4 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "sec0025"
          "titulo" => "Funding"
        ]
        1 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "sec0030"
          "titulo" => "Conflicts of interest"
        ]
        2 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "xack271159"
          "titulo" => "Acknowledgements"
        ]
        3 => array:1 [
          "titulo" => "References"
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf"
    "tienePdf" => true
    "fechaRecibido" => "2016-10-17"
    "fechaAceptado" => "2016-10-23"
    "bibliografia" => array:2 [
      "titulo" => "References"
      "seccion" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "bibs0005"
          "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:20 [
            0 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0105"
              "etiqueta" => "1"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:3 [
                  "comentario" => "(in press)"
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "New definition of SEPSIS and SEPTIC SHOCK: what gives us?"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:3 [
                            0 => "A. Rodr&iacute;guez"
                            1 => "I. Mart&iacute;n-Loeches"
                            2 => "J.C. Y&eacute;benes"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:2 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "MedIntensiva"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            1 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0110"
              "etiqueta" => "2"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "The third international consensus definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "M. Singer"
                            1 => "C.S. Deutschman"
                            2 => "C.W. Seymour"
                            3 => "M. Shankar-Hari"
                            4 => "D. Annane"
                            5 => "M. Bauer"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "J Am Med Assoc"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "volumen" => "315"
                        "paginaInicial" => "801"
                        "paginaFinal" => "810"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            2 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0115"
              "etiqueta" => "3"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000&#8211;2012"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:5 [
                            0 => "K.M. Kaukonen"
                            1 => "M. Bailey"
                            2 => "S. Suzuki"
                            3 => "D. Pilcher"
                            4 => "R. Bellomo"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "J Am Med Assoc"
                        "fecha" => "2014"
                        "volumen" => "311"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1308"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1316"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            3 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0120"
              "etiqueta" => "4"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:3 [
                  "comentario" => "(in press)"
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Differences in impact of definitional elements on mortality precludes international comparisons of sepsis epidemiology-a cohort study illustrating the need for standardized reporting"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:3 [
                            0 => "M. Shankar-Hari"
                            1 => "D.A. Harrison"
                            2 => "K.M. Rowan"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1097/01.CCM.0000055402.68581.DC"
                      "Revista" => array:3 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Crit Care Med"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12626981"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            4 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0125"
              "etiqueta" => "5"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "C.W. Seymour"
                            1 => "V.X. Liu"
                            2 => "T.J. Iwashyna"
                            3 => "F.M. Brunkhorst"
                            4 => "T.D. Rea"
                            5 => "A. Scherag"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "J Am Med Assoc"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "volumen" => "315"
                        "paginaInicial" => "762"
                        "paginaFinal" => "774"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            5 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0130"
              "etiqueta" => "6"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Incidence and prognostic value of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunctions in ward patients"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:5 [
                            0 => "M.M. Churpek"
                            1 => "F.J. Zadravecz"
                            2 => "C. Winslow"
                            3 => "M.D. Howell"
                            4 => "D.P. Edelson"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1164/rccm.201502-0275OC"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Am J Respir Crit Care Med"
                        "fecha" => "2015"
                        "volumen" => "192"
                        "paginaInicial" => "958"
                        "paginaFinal" => "964"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26158402"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            6 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0135"
              "etiqueta" => "7"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "The surviving sepsis campaign bundles and outcome: results from the International Multicentre Prevalence Study on Sepsis (the IMPreSS study)"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "A. Rhodes"
                            1 => "G. Phillips"
                            2 => "R. Beale"
                            3 => "M. Cecconi"
                            4 => "J.-D. Chiche"
                            5 => "D. De Backer"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1007/s00134-015-3906-y"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Intensive Care Med"
                        "fecha" => "2015"
                        "volumen" => "41"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1620"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1628"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109396"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            7 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0140"
              "etiqueta" => "8"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "R. Ferrer"
                            1 => "A. Artigas"
                            2 => "M.M. Levy"
                            3 => "J. Blanco"
                            4 => "G. Gonz&aacute;lez-D&iacute;az"
                            5 => "J. Garnacho-Montero"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "J Am Med Assoc"
                        "fecha" => "2008"
                        "volumen" => "299"
                        "paginaInicial" => "2294"
                        "paginaFinal" => "2303"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            8 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0145"
              "etiqueta" => "9"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Diagnosing sepsis is subjective and highly variable: a survey of intensivists using case vignettes"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "C. Rhee"
                            1 => "S.S. Kadri"
                            2 => "R.L. Danner"
                            3 => "A.F. Suffredini"
                            4 => "A.F. Massaro"
                            5 => "B.T. Kitch"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1186/s13054-016-1266-9"
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Crit Care"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "volumen" => "20"
                        "paginaInicial" => "89"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27048508"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            9 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0150"
              "etiqueta" => "10"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000&#8211;2007)"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "G. Kumar"
                            1 => "N. Kumar"
                            2 => "A. Taneja"
                            3 => "T. Kaleekal"
                            4 => "S. Tarima"
                            5 => "E. McGinley"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1378/chest.11-0352"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Chest"
                        "fecha" => "2011"
                        "volumen" => "140"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1223"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1231"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21852297"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            10 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0155"
              "etiqueta" => "11"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Hospital incidence and mortality rates of sepsis"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "C. Fleischmann"
                            1 => "D.O. Thomas-Rueddel"
                            2 => "M. Hartmann"
                            3 => "C.S. Hartog"
                            4 => "T. Welte"
                            5 => "S. Heublein"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.3238/arztebl.2016.0159"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Dtsch Arztebl Int"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "volumen" => "113"
                        "paginaInicial" => "159"
                        "paginaFinal" => "166"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27010950"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            11 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0160"
              "etiqueta" => "12"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "R.C. Bone"
                            1 => "R.A. Balk"
                            2 => "F.B. Cerra"
                            3 => "R.P. Dellinger"
                            4 => "A.M. Fein"
                            5 => "W.A. Knaus"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Chest"
                        "fecha" => "1992"
                        "volumen" => "101"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1644"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1655"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1303622"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            12 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0165"
              "etiqueta" => "13"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "qSOFA does not replace SIRS in the definition of sepsis"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:3 [
                            0 => "J.-L. Vincent"
                            1 => "G.S. Martin"
                            2 => "M.M. Levy"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1186/s13054-016-1389-z"
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Crit Care"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "volumen" => "20"
                        "paginaInicial" => "210"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27423462"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            13 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0170"
              "etiqueta" => "14"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "The impact of timing of antibiotics on outcomes in severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:5 [
                            0 => "S.A. Sterling"
                            1 => "W.R. Miller"
                            2 => "J. Pryor"
                            3 => "M.A. Puskarich"
                            4 => "A.E. Jones"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1097/CCM.0000000000001142"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Crit Care Med"
                        "fecha" => "2015"
                        "volumen" => "43"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1907"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1915"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26121073"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            14 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0175"
              "etiqueta" => "15"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "The association between time to antibiotics and relevant clinical outcomes in emergency department patients with various stages of sepsis: a prospective multi-center study"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "B. de Groot"
                            1 => "A. Ansems"
                            2 => "D.H. Gerling"
                            3 => "D. Rijpsma"
                            4 => "P. van Amstel"
                            5 => "D. Linzel"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1186/s13054-015-0936-3"
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Crit Care"
                        "fecha" => "2015"
                        "volumen" => "19"
                        "paginaInicial" => "194"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25925412"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            15 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0180"
              "etiqueta" => "16"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Gram-negative bacteraemia; a multi-centre prospective evaluation of empiric antibiotic therapy and outcome in English acute hospitals"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "J.M. Fitzpatrick"
                            1 => "J.S. Biswas"
                            2 => "J.D. Edgeworth"
                            3 => "J. Islam"
                            4 => "N. Jenkins"
                            5 => "R. Judge"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1016/j.cmi.2015.10.034"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Clin Microbiol Infect"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "volumen" => "22"
                        "paginaInicial" => "244"
                        "paginaFinal" => "251"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26577143"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            16 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0185"
              "etiqueta" => "17"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3)"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "M. Shankar-Hari"
                            1 => "G.S. Phillips"
                            2 => "M.L. Levy"
                            3 => "C.W. Seymour"
                            4 => "V.X. Liu"
                            5 => "C.S. Deutschman"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "J Am Med Assoc"
                        "fecha" => "2016"
                        "volumen" => "315"
                        "paginaInicial" => "775"
                        "paginaFinal" => "787"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            17 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0190"
              "etiqueta" => "18"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "colaboracion" => "The ProCESS Investigators"
                          "etal" => false
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1056/NEJMoa1401602"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "N Engl J Med"
                        "fecha" => "2014"
                        "volumen" => "370"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1683"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1693"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24635773"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            18 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0195"
              "etiqueta" => "19"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "S.L. Peake"
                            1 => "A. Delaney"
                            2 => "M. Bailey"
                            3 => "R. Bellomo"
                            4 => "ARISE Investigators"
                            5 => "ANZICS Clinical Trials Group"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1056/NEJMoa1404380"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "N Engl J Med"
                        "fecha" => "2014"
                        "volumen" => "371"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1496"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1506"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25272316"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            19 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0200"
              "etiqueta" => "20"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => true
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "P.R. Mouncey"
                            1 => "T.M. Osborn"
                            2 => "G.S. Power"
                            3 => "D.A. Harrison"
                            4 => "M.Z. Sadique"
                            5 => "R.D. Grieve"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1056/NEJMoa1500896"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "N Engl J Med"
                        "fecha" => "2015"
                        "volumen" => "372"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1301"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1311"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25776532"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "agradecimientos" => array:1 [
      0 => array:4 [
        "identificador" => "xack271159"
        "titulo" => "Acknowledgements"
        "texto" => "<p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">None declared.</p>"
        "vista" => "all"
      ]
    ]
  ]
  "idiomaDefecto" => "en"
  "url" => "/21735727/0000004100000001/v1_201703040056/S2173572717300097/v1_201703040056/en/main.assets"
  "Apartado" => array:4 [
    "identificador" => "64269"
    "tipo" => "SECCION"
    "en" => array:2 [
      "titulo" => "Pont of view"
      "idiomaDefecto" => true
    ]
    "idiomaDefecto" => "en"
  ]
  "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/21735727/0000004100000001/v1_201703040056/S2173572717300097/v1_201703040056/en/main.pdf?idApp=WMIE&text.app=https://medintensiva.org/"
  "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173572717300097?idApp=WMIE"
]
Article information
ISSN: 21735727
Original language: English
The statistics are updated each day
Year/Month Html Pdf Total
2024 November 5 2 7
2024 October 158 69 227
2024 September 144 50 194
2024 August 179 64 243
2024 July 184 45 229
2024 June 201 106 307
2024 May 143 50 193
2024 April 105 40 145
2024 March 66 23 89
2024 February 62 38 100
2024 January 69 30 99
2023 December 82 33 115
2023 November 80 55 135
2023 October 66 63 129
2023 September 51 46 97
2023 August 37 21 58
2023 July 38 29 67
2023 June 39 18 57
2023 May 70 27 97
2023 April 67 24 91
2023 March 91 47 138
2023 February 74 37 111
2023 January 58 24 82
2022 December 96 31 127
2022 November 104 51 155
2022 October 113 48 161
2022 September 60 41 101
2022 August 98 59 157
2022 July 112 45 157
2022 June 53 37 90
2022 May 56 44 100
2022 April 55 43 98
2022 March 85 60 145
2022 February 70 46 116
2022 January 83 42 125
2021 December 46 50 96
2021 November 50 33 83
2021 October 114 88 202
2021 September 58 43 101
2021 August 55 47 102
2021 July 43 34 77
2021 June 55 23 78
2021 May 111 56 167
2021 April 348 149 497
2021 March 240 74 314
2021 February 129 41 170
2021 January 108 46 154
2020 December 34 38 72
2020 November 27 28 55
2020 October 39 30 69
2020 September 32 14 46
2020 August 33 16 49
2020 July 23 11 34
2020 June 28 16 44
2020 May 23 10 33
2020 April 22 16 38
2020 March 14 15 29
2020 February 25 27 52
2020 January 17 22 39
2019 December 33 15 48
2019 November 27 25 52
2019 October 27 13 40
2019 September 29 23 52
2019 August 30 15 45
2019 July 20 17 37
2019 June 9 14 23
2019 May 34 16 50
2019 April 13 18 31
2019 March 17 32 49
2019 February 22 25 47
2019 January 15 23 38
2018 December 51 35 86
2018 November 40 48 88
2018 October 86 25 111
2018 September 38 8 46
2018 August 14 6 20
2018 July 28 14 42
2018 June 36 10 46
2018 May 15 4 19
2018 April 59 10 69
2018 March 37 8 45
2018 February 72 6 78
2018 January 43 11 54
2017 December 74 14 88
2017 November 19 11 30
2017 October 19 8 27
2017 September 18 13 31
2017 August 20 9 29
2017 July 10 9 19
2017 June 27 9 36
2017 May 15 7 22
2017 April 30 0 30
2017 March 0 1 1
Show all

Follow this link to access the full text of the article

Idiomas
Medicina Intensiva (English Edition)
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?