Journal Information
Vol. 48. Issue 12.
Pages 731-734 (December 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
26
Vol. 48. Issue 12.
Pages 731-734 (December 2024)
Scientific Letter
Full text access
Stress relaxation, another cause of “Pseudo auto-PEEP”?
Estrés de relajación, otra causa de "Pseudo auto-PEEP"?
Visits
26
Manuel Valdivia Marchala, María Carmen Bermúdez Ruiza, José Ricardo Naranjo Izurietaa, Ashlen Rodríguez Carmonab, Juan Francisco Martínez Carmonac, José Manuel Serrano Simóna,
Corresponding author
jm.serranosimon@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
a Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba. Spain
b Unidad Terapia Intensiva, Hospital El Carmen, Mendoza. Argentina
c Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga. Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (2)
Additional material (2)
Full Text

In critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure greater than that applied externally (auto-PEEP) reflects dynamic hyperinflation of the lungs. The term “Pseudo auto-PEEP” (Bilen & Cohen, 19931 was coined to describe a progressive increase in expiratory plateau pressure in prolonged occlusion, attributed to a retrograde flow of extraluminal gas into the airways. However, the underlying mechanisms have not yet been closely studied. Herein, we describe another mechanism for this phenomenon, explained by stress relaxation due to inequalities in the expiratory time constant (τE), manifested in inspiration and expiration.

In mechanical ventilation, a final expiratory volume greater than the relaxation volume generates an end-expiratory pressure known as “auto-PEEP”.2 Airway dynamic hyperinflation could be the pathophysiological explanation for this phenomenon, as could expiratory dynamic collapse, insufficient expiratory time, or increased expiratory time constant (τE), which have important consequences on cardiovascular function and respiratory mechanics.3,4

Auto-PEEP is usually detected by end-expiratory occlusion (static auto-PEEP) or end-expiratory flow amputation (dynamic auto-PEEP).5 Another term associated with this is occult positive end-expiratory pressure,6 resulting from severe airway obstruction, as in patients with asthma, which can be observed using the end-inspiratory occlusion maneuver. Interestingly, in a recent article, Abella & Gordo7 highlights the importance of recognizing the occult PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients with airflow obstruction due to the impact on the hemodynamic, respiratory mechanics, effort, and asynchronies. Bilen et al.1 described another related phenomenon, termed pseudo auto-PEEP caused by a backward gas flow from the extrapulmonary to the alveolar space, illustrated by the progressive increase in end-expiratory pressure during prolonged expiratory occlusion.

In this study, we aimed to describe the pathophysiological mechanism of a phenomenon that reproduces findings similar to those described by Bilen et al.1 (Fig. 1A). We hypothesize that stress relaxation caused by regional inequalities in τE generates anterograde contra-pulmonary flow from fast emptying areas to slow emptying areas (“pendelluft”). This phenomenon manifests in both inspiratory and expiratory occlusions, as suggested by the logarithmic fit of the pressure released during the relaxation stress (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1.

Respiratory signal monitoring during volume-controlled ventilation.

Panel A. Recordings of airway pressure (Paw), esophageal pressure (Peso), and flow during expiratory occlusion. Note the following remarkable features: the near-zero end-expiratory flow state in regular cycles and the slow rate of the rise of the Paw to reach a stable plateau (≅ 6sec).

Panel B. Traces of transpulmonary pressure during expiratory occlusion (upper panel) and inspiratory occlusion maneuver (lower panel). Note similarity fitting by logarithmic regression of inspiratory stress relaxation and plateau pressure during prolonged expiratory occlusion, with an apparent mirror image.

Panel C. Flow-volume loop. Remarkable emptying compartments were noticeable in the expiratory time constants (τE) and exhaled volume, evidence of initial rapid emptying and a subsequent delay, possibly due to the pendelluft phenomenon (arrow). Note the absence of an end-expiratory flow limitation.

(0.94MB).

A 42-year-old female patient with a medical history of pulmonary interstitial disease was admitted to the ICU after surgical intervention involving a right unilateral pulmonary transplant. The patient had multiple postoperative complications, including hemothorax, bacterial and fungal pneumonia, and bronchial prosthesis due to stenosis of the transplanted lung, which required support with venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the perioperative period. Moreover, prolonged mechanical ventilation and ICU stay were required. To evaluate respiratory mechanics, advanced monitoring by esophageal pressures and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) were performed during controlled ventilation with neuromuscular blockade. Respiratory mechanical parameters were obtained via multiple linear regression, and the results showed high elastance and resistance (Ers: 43.18cmH2O/L, EL 40.09cmH2O/L, and total resistance: 15.83cmH2O/L/s). A prolonged end-expiratory occlusion maneuver showed a progressive increase in pressure until a plateau (6s) was reached. This finding corresponds to stress relaxation during inspiratory occlusion (Fig. 1A). The values of transpulmonary pressure correspond to a logarithmic function (natural logarithm, ln) of the release pressure in stress relaxation, and the values of the end-expiratory occlusion pressure revealed equivalent but inverse log functions, i.e., 0.525*ln(x) and –0.514*ln(x), respectively (Fig. 1B). A specific form of auto-PEEP is the so-called pseudo-PEEP, which was described by Bilen in 19931 and is attributed to the retrograde flow of extraluminal gas into the airway. To the best of our knowledge, no additional studies have been conducted on this concept. We provide a representative case, which shows similar findings that can be explained by relaxation stress due to inequalities in time constants and thus complements the original description.

The equilibrium state of the inspiratory and expiratory plateau pressure depends on the relaxation stress due to thoracic-pulmonary viscoelastic resistance, surface tension, and differences in regional time constants.8 The stress relaxation has a nonlinear relationship with the pressure-dependent viscoelastic properties of the respiratory system, with a focus on the differences in energy distribution.9

Our case represents a phenomenon equivalent to pseudo auto-PEEP, which is rationally explained by stress relaxation due to extreme inequalities in time constants. The flow-volume loop suggested an obstructive mechanism due to its biphasic morphology2,6 (Fig. 1C). However, this can be explained by the presence of two different lung-emptying compartments. These findings were confirmed by monitoring with EIT (video in Electronic Supplementary Material, ESM). Notice in Fig. 1A shows how the end-expiratory flow reached a level near 0. As shown in the radiological images (Fig. 2), there was a predominantly unilateral pathology with notable involvement of the left native lung. Finally, Fig. 1B shows how stress relaxation has an equivalent logarithmic fitting of both the inspiratory and expiratory phases, manifested in the progressive increase in end-expiratory pressure during the prolonged hold, which simulates the pseudo auto-PEEP phenomenon. In addition, this finding can be used as a parameter to evaluate the severity of lung injury.9

Figure 2.

Radiological images. On the left are the conventional radiological findings and on the right are the computed tomography findings. Note the apparent disparity between lungs.

(0.39MB).

The clinical and physiological consequences of pseudo-auto-PEEP remain to be determined. Not recognizing these may affect the calculation of respiratory mechanics. Although our purpose was not to evaluate inspiratory effort, this phenomenon could increase muscle workload.

Author contributions

JM SS designed the study, conducted the study, collected and analysed the patient data, interpreted all data, and wrote the manuscript. MVM interpreted the data, revised and wrote the manuscript. CBR interpreted the data, revised the manuscript. JRNI revised the manuscript ARC revised the manuscript. JFMC revised the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study procedures and data collected for this report were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital, Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain (Refer.: Musc-Txp23). The patient could not execute the permission to publish patient information, so the surrogates (family legally responsible, sister) were informed about the study with enough detail that the patient was admitted, understood the entire procedure, and signed a written informed consent form before inclusion in the study. All methods were performed according to the guidelines and regulations of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Acknowledgment

The writers thank Dr. Jose Castaño Perez and Dr. Guillermo Besso Centeno for their critical advice, encouragement, and corrections to this manuscript.

Appendix A
Supplementary data

The following are Supplementary data to this article:

(0.63MB)

References
[1]
Z. Bilen, I.L. Cohen.
"Pseudo Auto-PEEP"? A new cause for discrepancy between the end expiratory occlusion plateau pressure and airway opening pressure.
Chest, 103 (1993), pp. 1481-1494
[2]
M.J. Morris, R.G. Madgwick, D.J. Lane.
Differences between functional residual capacity and elastic equilibrium volume in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Thorax., 51 (1996), pp. 415-419
[3]
J.J. Marini.
Should PEEP be used in airflow obstruction?.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 140 (1989), pp. 1
[4]
A. Rossi, A. Ganassin, G. Polese, V. Grassini.
Pulmonary hyperinflation and ventilator-dependent patients.
Eur Respir J, 10 (1997), pp. 1663-1674
[5]
A. Rossi, S.B. Gottfried, L. Zocchi, et al.
Measurement of static compliance of the total respiratory system in patients with acute respiratory failure during mechanical ventilation. The effect of intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 131 (1985), pp. 672-677
[6]
P.E. Pepe, J.J. Marini.
Occult positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with airflow obstruction.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 126 (1982), pp. 166-170
[7]
A. Abella, F. Gordo.
Personalization of ventilatory support in obstructive patients; intrinsic PEEP also matters.
Med Intensiva, 47 (2023), pp. 108-109
[8]
R. Hughes, A.J. May, J.G. Widdicombe.
Stress relaxation in rabbits’ lungs.
[9]
S. Ganzert, K. Möller, D. Steinmann, S. Schumann, J. Guttmann.
Pressure-dependent stress relaxation in acute respiratory distress syndrome and healthy lungs: an investigation based on a viscoelastic model.
Crit Care., 13 (2009), pp. R199
Copyright © 2024. Elsevier España, S.L.U. and SEMICYUC
Download PDF
Idiomas
Medicina Intensiva (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
Supplemental materials
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?