Publique en esta revista
Información de la revista
Vol. 46. Núm. 9.
Páginas 501-507 (Septiembre 2022)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
...
Vol. 46. Núm. 9.
Páginas 501-507 (Septiembre 2022)
Original article
Acceso a texto completo
Correlation and validity of imputed PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2 in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation at 2600m above sea level
Correlación y validez de la PaO2/FiO2 y SpO2/FiO2 imputadas en pacientes con ventilación mecánica invasiva a 2.600 metros sobre el nivel del mar
Visitas
...
G. Ortiza, A. Bastidasb,
Autor para correspondencia
, M. Garay-Fernándezc, A. Larac, M. Benavidesc, E. Rochad, A. Buitragoc, G. Díazc, J. Ordóñezc, L.F. Reyesb
a Pulmonary Medicine, Universidad El Bosque, Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Santa Clara Bogotá, Colombia
b School of Medicine, Universidad de la Sabana, Clínica Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
c Pulmonary Medicine Universidad El Bosque, Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Santa Clara Bogotá, Colombia
d Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Santa Clara Bogotá, Colombia
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (1)
Material adicional (1)
Abstract
Objective

To establish the correlation and validity between PaO2/FiO2 obtained on arterial gases versus noninvasive methods (linear, nonlinear, logarithmic imputation of PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2) in patients under mechanical ventilation living at high altitude.

Design

Ambispective descriptive multicenter cohort study.

Setting

Two intensive care units (ICU) from Colombia at 2600m a.s.l.

Patients or participants

Consecutive critically ill patients older than 18 years with at least 24h of mechanical ventilation were included from June 2016 to June 2019.

Interventions

None.

Variables

Variables analyzed were demographic, physiological messures, laboratory findings, oxygenation index and clinical condition. Nonlinear, linear and logarithmic imputation formulas were used to calculate PaO2 from SpO2, and at the same time the SpO2/FiO2 by severe hypoxemia diagnosis. The intraclass correlation coefficient, area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio were calculated.

Results

The correlation between PaO2/FiO2 obtained from arterial gases, PaO2/FiO2 derived from one of the proposed methods (linear, non-linear, and logarithmic formula), and SpO2/FiO2 measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient was high (greater than 0.77, p<0.001). The different imputation methods and SpO2/FiO2 have a similar diagnostic performance in patients with severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 <150). PaO2/FiO2 linear imputation AUC ROC 0,84 (IC 0.81–0.87, p<0.001), PaO2/FiO2 logarithmic imputation AUC ROC 0.84 (IC 0.80–0.87, p<0.001), PaO2/FiO2 non-linear imputation AUC ROC 0.82 (IC 0.79–0.85, p<0.001), SpO2/FiO2 oximetry AUC ROC 0.84 (IC 0.81–0.87, p<0.001).

Conclusions

At high altitude, the SaO2/FiO2 ratio and the imputed PaO2/FiO2 ratio have similar diagnostic performance in patients with severe hypoxemia ventilated by various pathological conditions.

Keywords:
Mechanical ventilation
SaO2/FiO2
PaO2/FiO2
Respiratory failure
High altitude
Abbreviations:
ARI
ARDS
AUC-ROC
CI
ICC
FiO2
MSNM
PaCO2
PaO2
PEEP
SOFA
Resumen
Objetivo

Establecer la correlación y validez entre PaO2/FiO2 obtenida en gases arteriales versus métodos no invasivos (imputación lineal, no lineal, logarítmica de PaO2/FiO2 y SpO2/FiO2) en pacientes bajo ventilación mecánica que viven en altitudes elevadas.

Diseño

Estudio de cohorte multicéntrico descriptivo ambispectivo

Ámbito

Dos unidades de cuidados intensivos de Colombia a 2.600 m s.n.m.

Pacientes o participantes

Se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos en estado crítico mayores de 18 años con al menos 24h de ventilación mecánica desde junio de 2016 a junio de 2019.

Intervenciones

Ninguna.

Variables

Las variables analizadas fueron demográficas, fisiológicas, hallazgos de laboratorio, índice de oxigenación y estado clínico. Se utilizaron fórmulas de imputación no lineales, lineales y logarítmicas para calcular la PaO2 a partir de la SpO2, y al mismo tiempo la SpO2/FiO2 mediante el diagnóstico de hipoxemia severa. Se calculó el coeficiente de correlación intraclase, el área bajo la curva ROC, la sensibilidad, la especificidad, el valor predictivo positivo, el valor predictivo negativo, la razón de verosimilitud positiva y negativa.

Resultados

La correlación entre PaO2/FiO2 obtenida a partir de gases arteriales, PaO2/FiO2 derivada de uno de los métodos propuestos (fórmula lineal, no lineal y logarítmica) y SpO2/FiO2 medida por el coeficiente de correlación intraclase fue alta (mayor a 0,77, p<0,001). Los diferentes métodos de imputación y SpO2/FiO2 tienen un rendimiento diagnóstico similar en pacientes con hipoxemia severa (PaO2/FiO2<150). PaO2/FiO2 imputación lineal AUC ROC 0,84 (IC 0,81-0,87; p<0,001), PaO2/FiO2 imputación logarítmica AUC ROC 0,84 (IC 0,80-0,87; p<0,001), PaO2/Imputación no lineal de FiO2 AUC ROC 0,82 (IC 0,79-0,85; p<0,001), oximetría de SpO2/FiO2 AUC ROC 0,84 (IC 0,81-0,87; p<0,001).

Conclusiones

A gran altitud, el cociente SaO2/FiO2 y el cociente PaO2/FiO2 imputado tienen un rendimiento diagnóstico similar en pacientes con hipoxemia severa bajo ventilación mecánica invasiva por diversas patologías.

Palabras clave:
Ventilación mecánica
SaO2/FiO2
PaO2/FiO2
Insuficiencia respiratoria
Altitud elevada
Texto completo
Introduction

Acute respiratory insufficiency (ARI) is diagnosed in 11.3% of hospitalizations in the United States. Its incidence calculated for 2001 was 502 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, increasing to 704 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2009.1 The relationship between the pressure of oxygen dissolved in the blood (PaO2) and the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (PaO2/FiO2), an index that classifies the severity of the disease in patients with acute respiratory failure, was incorporated in 2011 in the Berlin Consensus definition of adult acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)2 and has been included in severity scores, such as in the sequential multiple organ damage assessment (SOFA) scale.3,4

The measurement of arterial blood gases is required to determine PaO2 and calculate the PaO2/FiO2 ratio.5,6 However, this technique can present limitations in its use, either because of difficulty in taking the sample (either because it requires trained personnel, complicated arterial accesses, constant puncture requirements, pain at the time of sample collection and skin laceration) or because it represents an increase in hospital costs.7,8

A non-invasive substitute for the PaO2/FiO2 ratio is the ratio of the percentage of hemoglobin saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) and the inspired fraction of oxygen (FIO2) (SpO2/FiO2).9 That allows the assessment and classification of the severity of respiratory failure10 without the need for arterial blood sampling.11 Other methods have been proposed to estimate PaO2 without direct measurement of oxygen in arterial blood. These models ensure their equivalence by imputing PaO2 from SpO2. These imputation techniques can be classified into those that simulate the hemoglobin dissociation curve (non-linear)12,13 and those that take into account other types of relationships (linear and logarithmic).14,15 The studies that have compared these formulas show an adequate relationship between measured and imputed PaO2 values, with high correlation coefficients ranging from 0.75 to 0.9.12,13,15

It must be taken into account that about 140 million people live at high altitudes (over 2500m above sea level), which is why it is essential to understand how the oxygenation indices (PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2) behave in these regions.16 However, we do not know of previous studies conducted in populations living at altitudes above 1500m a.s.l., which evaluate the performance of different imputation methods and SpO2/FiO2 for the diagnosis of severe hypoxemia. Therefore, we aimed to establish the correlation and validity between PaO2/FiO2 obtained in arterial gases vs. non-invasive methods (linear, non-linear, logarithmic imputation of PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2) in patients living at 2600 a.s.l. and under invasive mechanical ventilation.

Methodology

Ambispective cohort study was conducted in patients hospitalized in intensive care units with invasive ventilatory support in two third-level care hospitals in Colombia, the Santa Clara Hospital in the city of Bogota (Altitude: 2640m above sea level) and the Clínica Universidad de La Sabana in the city of Chia (Altitude: 2562m above sea level). The data was initially collected retrospectively, from June 2016 to April 2019, and prospectively from April to June 2019; information was obtained from the electronic medical records from the period of hospitalization.

Patients

Subjects over 18 years old, with at least 24h of invasive mechanical ventilation from any cause, with simultaneous arterial gases and SpO2 measurements, were included, regardless of the saturation value, severity of the disease, type of ventilatory mode, vasopressor support, or radiological involvement. Patients without concomitant measurements of arterial gases, SpO2 and ventilatory parameters were excluded. Patients with terminal disease, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and those in whom FiO2, PaO2, and SpO2 data had not been reported in the clinical records or had bad quality in the pulse wave were also excluded.

Variables

Information was collected on age, sex, skin pigmentation, type of pathology of entry, weight, height, vital signs, values of hemoglobin, hematocrit, bilirubin, and creatinine, findings on chest radiography, with verification of the presence of infiltrates and the number of quadrants involved, SOFA severity score, vasopressor support, ventilatory support parameters (PEEP level >10 and <10cmH20,17,18 peak pressure, plateau pressure, tidal volume), total arterial gas values and oxygenation rates, days of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays. Severe hypoxemia was the value of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio obtained from arterial gases less than 150.19,20

Severingaus-Ellis(no linear),21,22 Rice (linear)14 and Pandharipande (logarithmic linear)15 formulas were used to calculate imputed PaO2 from SpO2. The values of imputed PaO2 were used for the calculation of imputed PaO2/FiO2; besides, SpO2/FiO2 was calculated simultaneously. The blood sample for arterial gases analysis was obtained through an arterial line; the oximeters used measure the saturation through an infrared sensor with a wavelength of 905nm 2.0mW with an error range of 1%; verification and calibration were performed daily during the study.

All the subjects admitted to the ICU of both institutions during the study period were included. In order to reduce errors in data collection and transcription, the data were recorded by double typing and reviewed by two members of the research team. This protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Clínica Universidad de La Sabana.

Statistical analysis

An initial descriptive analysis was carried out, summarizing the qualitative variables in frequencies and percentages, the quantitative variables with normal distribution in means and standard deviation and if they did not meet the criteria of normality in medians and interquartile ranges. The qualitative variables were compared through the chi-square test and the quantitative ones with Student's t-test or Mann–Whitney U test according to their distribution.

We applied the intraclass correlation coefficient between the values obtained from imputed PaO2, PaO2/FiO2 derived from the imputation methods, and the SpO2/FiO2 with the PaO2/FiO2 of the arterial gases. We considered the correlations thus: 0–0.3 null; 0.31–0.50 low; 0.51–0.70 moderate; 0.76–1.00 strong. The Bland–Altman method was used to evaluate the concordance. For the validity, the area under the ROC curve of the quantitative values obtained through the three imputation methods and the SpO2/FiO2 value was calculated, comparing it with the value of the arterial gases of severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2<=150), to obtain the best cut-off point using the Youden index and calculating the values of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive and negative likelihood ratio. The ROC area was also used to establish the equivalence ranges between the different SpO2/FiO2 measurements. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. The statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 22.0 licensed program (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Chicago, IL).

Results

We included a total of 664 patients during the study period, the general characteristics of the patients were described according to positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) greater or less than 10cm H2O and are showed in Table 1. Among the general characteristics, it was found that the patients had an mean age of 56±20 years, with a male predominance 444/664 (67%), most of the pathological conditions on admission were non-surgical (81%), the mean SOFA was 15±2 points, and 56% of the patients required vasoactive support.

Table 1.

General characteristics of the cohort.

Characteristics  General population n=664PEEP<10 cmH2O n=438PEEP>10 cmH2O n=226p-Value 
Age (years) (SD)  56.0  (19.9)  55.8  (20.1)  56.6  (19.5)  0.603 
Sex (male), n (%)  444  (0.6)  291  (0.6)  153  (0.6)  0.744 
Condition on admission n (%)
Elective surgery  54  (0.0)  41  (0.1)  13  (0.0)  0.272 
Emergency surgery  75  (0.1)  49  (0.1)  26  (0.1)   
Non-surgical  535  (0.8)  348  (0.7)  187  (0.8)   
Height cm (SD)  163.0  (9.0)  162.9  (9.1)  163.0  (8.8)  0.876 
Weight kg (SD)  66.8  (157.2)  66.6  (12.4)  67.3  (12.8)  0.493 
Vital signs (DE)  87.4  (17.7)  87.3  (18.0)  87.5  (17.0)  0.862 
SBP mmHg  119.0  (24.0)  119.1  (24.4)  119.1  (23.2)  0.856 
DBP mmHg  71.6  (17.0)  71.4  (17.4)  71.9  (16.3)  0.493 
MAP mmHg  87.4  (17.7)  87.3  (18.0)  87.5  (17.0)  0.862 
HR beats×min  86.8  (21.3)  84.9  (20.6)  90.6  (22.2)  0.001 
RR resp×min  18.8  (4.7)  18.6  (4.7)  19.2  (4.7)  0.175 
Temperature  36.9  (0.7)  36.8  (0.6)  36.9  (0.8)  0.037 
Laboratory workup (SD)
Leukocytes cell/ml  11,979.7  (7224.7)  12,145.1  (6975.9)  11,659.0  (7689.8)  0.426 
Hb (g/dL)  11.90  (3.0)  11.79  (3.0)  12.11  (3.0)  0.200 
Hematocrit (%)  36.4  (9.0)  36.2  (9.0)  37.0  (9.0)  0.280 
Platelet count cell/ml  231,737.6  (102,667.8)  233,050.3  (98,410.4)  229,199.9  (110,618.9)  0.659 
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)  1.27  (1.9)  1.22  (1.7)  1.34  (2.2)  0.483 
Creatinine (mg/dL)  1.40  (1.4)  1.40  (1.5)  1.39  (1.3)  0.920 
Sodium (mEq)  143.5  (8.5)  143.3  (9.1)  143.9  (7.1)  0.327 
Potassium (mEq)  3.97  (0.8)  3.97  (0.7)  3.97  (0.8)  0.917 
Infiltrates on chest X-ray Quadrants involved n(%)
111  (0.3)  41  (0.3)  70  (0.4)   
127  (0.4)  43  (0.3)  84  (0.4)   
21  (0.0)  14  (0.1)  (0.0)   
31  (0.1)  22  (0.1)  (0.0)   
SOFA (IQR)  15  (2)  15  (2)  16  (2)  0.019 
Vasopressor support  375  (0.5)  242  (0.5)  133  (0.5)  0.376 

Notes: SD: standard deviation, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, MAP: mean arterial pressure, HR: heart rate, RR: respiratory rate, Hb: hemoglobin, SOFA: Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, IQR: interquartile range.

Arterial gases and mechanical ventilation

The mean PaO2 was 83.7±27.5mmHg, SpO2 92.4±2.3%, PaCO2 33±2.9mmHg, and bicarbonate 21.7±1.6mEq/L, with no significant differences between subgroups. The pH was 7.35±0.11 and the base excess −1.3±1.4mEq/L. The ventilatory parameters were a tidal volume of 481±58.3ml, FIO2 of 50±19%, plateau pressure 19.3±4.3cmH2O, and driving pressure of 10.8cmH2O. The mean time of mechanical ventilation was 7.1 days, ICU length of stay was 10.4 days and overall mortality was 18%. (Supplementary Material)

Correlation and validity results

The correlation between PaO2/FiO2 obtained from arterial gases, PaO2/FiO2 derived from one of the proposed methods (linear, non-linear, and logarithmic formula), and SpO2/FiO2 measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient was high (greater than 0.77, p<0.001). The different imputation methods and SpO2/FiO2 have a similar diagnostic performance in patients with severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 <150), with an area under the ROC curve greater than 0.8 with a similar sensitivity and specificity, PaO2/FiO2 linear imputation AUC ROC 0.84 (IC 0.81–0.87, p<0.001), PaO2/FiO2 logarithmic imputation AUC ROC 0.84 (IC 0.80–0.87, p<0.001), PaO2/FiO2 non-linear imputation AUC ROC 0.82 (IC 0.79–0.85, p<0.001), SpO2/FiO2 oximetry AUC ROC 0.84 (IC 0.81–0.87, p<0.001). Table 2 and Fig. 1.

Table 2.

Results of validity between the formulas of imputation of PaO2, PaO2/FiO2, SpO2/FiO2 and PaO2, PaO2/FiO2 of arterial blood gases and severe Hypoxemia PaO2/FiO2<=150.

Method  AUC-ROC  CI 95%  Cut-off point  SENS  SPEC  PPV  NPV  LR+  LR-  p-Value 
PaO2 linear imputation  0.83  (0.80, 0.86)  73.1  0.65  0.83  0.19  0.81  3.88  0.20  <0.001 
PaO2 logarithmic imputation  0.84  (0.81, 0.87)  50.2  0.67  0.82  0.20  0.82  3.71  0.22  <0.001 
PaO2 non-linear imputation  0.60  (0.55, 0.64)  70.8  0.40  0.79  0.13  0.71  1.86  0.27  <0.001 
PaO2/FiO2 linear imputation  0.84  (0.81, 0.87)  147.6  0.67  0.82  0.20  0.82  3.71  0.22  <0.001 
PaO2/FiO2 logarithmic imputation  0.84  (0.80, 0.87)  119.1  0.62  0.87  0.19  0.81  4.64  0.15  <0.001 
PaO2/FiO2 non-linear imputation  0.82  (0.79, 0.85)  141.3  0.65  0.83  0.19  0.81  3.87  0.20  <0.001 
SpO2/FiO2 oximetry  0.84  (0.81, 0.87)  204.4  0.61  0.87  0.18  0.81  4.62  0.15  <0.001 

Notes: SENS: sensitivity; SPEC: specificity; AUC-ROC: area under the ROC curve; PPV: positive predictive values; NPV: negative predictive values; LR: likelihood ratio.

Figure 1.

ROC curve with yield of PaO2/FiO2 imputed by the three methods of imputation and SpO2/FiO2.

Notes: AUC-ROC: area under the ROC-curve, PaO2/FiO2 linear imputation 0.84 (95%CI: 0.81–0.87); PaO2/FiO2 logarithmic imputation 0.84 (95%CI: 0.80–0.87); PaO2/FiO2 non-linear 0.82 (95%CI: 0.79–0.85); SO2/FiO2 pulse oximetry 0.84 (95%CI: 0.81–0.87).

(0,11MB).

We found that the correlation of the different methods applied (imputation and SpO2/FIO2) decreased with hemoglobin levels equal to or less than 7g/dl (0.58 p<0.001), as well as with total bilirubin values equal to or greater than 3mg/dL (0.68 p<0.001), the results above concordance between imputed PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2 with Bland–Altman graph, and the validity for physiologic variable, mechanical ventilation and radiological findings between SpO2/FiO2 and severe Hypoxemia PaO2/FiO2<=150 showed in Supplementary Material.

In a practical way and to establish the usefulness of SpO2/FiO2 measurement, we present the ranges of values between SpO2/FiO2 and PaO2/FiO2 imputed by the three methods and PaO2/FiO2 measured by arterial gases in Table 3.

Table 3.

Values of correlation of SaO2/FiO2 by pulse oximetry and PaO2/FiO2 by three imputation techniques and arterial blood gases in patients under mechanical ventilation by ROC curve.

SpO2/FiO2PaO2/FiO2 linear imputationPaO2/FiO2 logarithmic imputationPaO2/FiO2 non-linear imputationPaO2/FiO2 arterial blood gases
>300297  328  247  284  203  323  246  324 
250  299  250  297  149  247  149  203  225  246 
200  249  148  250  100  149  129  149  182  225 
150  199  92  148  64  149  98  129  137  182 
100  149  37  92  30  64  68  98  100  137 
<10026  37  27  30  51  68  62  100 
Discussion

This study found an adequate correlation between PaO2/FiO2 obtained by the three proposed imputation methods, SpO2/FiO2, and PaO2/FiO2 values obtained by arterial blood gases, considering the usefulness of these tools as non-invasive methods for the assessment of the oxygenation status in patients with invasive ventilatory support. We also found that the three imputation methods evaluated and the SpO2/FiO2 have an adequate diagnostic performance for severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2<=150mmHg by arterial gases) in patients living at high altitude.

It was previously determined that the concordance between the different non-invasive oxygenation indexes and the PaO2/FiO2 obtained by arterial gases is high7,16,23,24 Cineci and Gomez found an overall correlation index of 0.745 between SpO2/FiO2 and PaO2/FiO2 in patients with ARF11; Rice et al. using imputation formulas, report a correspondence range between 0.73 and 0.8812,14,15 that are similar to those observed in our study (greater than 0.77). This accuracy can be influenced by the use of PEEP, hemoglobin levels, total bilirubin values, by the determinants of the affinity of oxygen for hemoglobin (pH, temperature, CO2, 2.3-diphosphoglycerate, and fetal hemoglobin)12,15 and extreme values of arterial saturation,6,25 which can vary in critically-ill ventilated patients. Our results show an important decrease in the correlation in subjects with hyperbilirubinemia (total bilirubin ≥3mg/dL) and hemoglobin less than ≤7mg/dL, without it being significantly affected by temperature, vasoactive support, and severity of multiorgan involvement.

Theoretically, imputation techniques that simulate the hemoglobin dissociation curve have a better diagnostic yield with the patient's oxygenation status. Brown's12,13 and Gadrey's24 studies found that the diagnosis of moderate-to-severe hypoxemia is better when non-linear formulas are used. Despite this, our data show similar performance among the different imputation methods, without important changes in their diagnostic capacity when patients with arterial oxygen saturation greater than 97% are included. This difference is probably explained by the type of population studied and the barometric pressure to which our patients are exposed. It is important to emphasize that our results are aimed at the recognition of severe hypoxemia and not hyperoxemia, where the subrogated SpO2 values may be more limited.25

Although mechanical ventilators represent a closed circuit, there are not pressurized; therefore, patients ventilated at high altitude may have lower PaO2 and SaO2 values than those obtained at sea level.6,26,27 Previous observations show that the corresponding values of SaO2/FiO2 from 214 to 235 are equivalent to a PaO2/FiO2 (for arterial gases) of 200 in inhabitants of low-altitude areas.11,15 However, there are no studies in patients under invasive mechanical ventilation living at more than 1500m a.s.l. that establish a single SpO2/FiO2 value corresponding to a given PaO2/FiO2. This limitation also affects the values obtained by imputation methods, since it is not possible to establish values that correspond to these measurements without any margin of error.13 Considering these difficulties, we propose a table of equivalence between SpO2/FiO2 ranges and PaO2/FiO2 values imputed by the three methods and that obtained by arterial gases, to establish values for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with different degrees of hypoxemia that may be useful in clinical practice. We must not forget to evaluate these considering medical criteria and the condition of the patient.

We acknowledge that our study has certain limitations. First, a single arterial gas sampling was performed, which can affect the reliability of the measured values of the quantitative variables for the diagnosis of hypoxemia and the appearance of random errors. However, the samples were taken by trained personnel and keeping all the recommendations for adequate processing in the laboratory. Second, some data were collected retrospectively, which can generate an information bias; however, we verified that the values obtained from the clinical histories corresponded to the data reported directly by the laboratory. Third, despite having a large population living at high altitude, our sample does not include all possible altitudes; but we consider that it is unlikely that there are significant differences in the reliability of the formulas. Fourth, SpO2 values can be affected by methemoglobin and carboxyhemoglobin levels, which were not measured in the study. Despite this, none of the patients were suspected to have these disorders.

In conclusion, the present study found that at high altitude SaO2/FiO2 and imputed PaO2/FiO2 have a similar diagnostic yield in patients with severe hypoxemia, ventilated for various pathological conditions. Equivalence ranges between SaO2/FiO2 and PaO2/FiO2 values can be a non-invasive option in the follow-up of these subjects. It is necessary to develop additional prospective studies, where therapeutic goals of SpO2/FiO2 and imputed PaO2/FiO2 are explored to corroborate the safety ranges of these measurements.

Funding

The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article

Author contributions

GO, AB, MB, MGF and AL had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. GO, AB, MB, MGF, AL, GD, JO contributed substantially to the study design, data analysis and interpretation, and the writing of the manuscript. GO, AB contributed substantially to data statistical analysis.

Conflict of interests

The authors of this manuscript have no competing interests directly related to the manuscript's content.

Appendix A
Supplementary data

The following are the supplementary data to this article:

References
[1]
M.S. Stefan, M.S. Shieh, P.S. Pekow, M.B. Rothberg, J.S. Steingrub, T. Lagu, et al.
Epidemiology and outcomes of acute respiratory failure in the United States, 2001 to 2009: a national survey.
J Hosp Med, 8 (2013), pp. 76-82
[2]
N.D. Ferguson, E. Fan, L. Camporota, M. Antonelli, A. Anzueto, R. Beale, et al.
The Berlin definition of ARDS: an expanded rationale, justification, and supplementary material.
Intensive Care Med, 38 (2012), pp. 1573-1582
[3]
R. Moreno, J.L. Vincent, R. Matos, A. Mendonça, F. Cantraine, L. Thijs, et al.
The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems of the ESICM.
Intensive Care Med, 25 (1999), pp. 686-696
[4]
C.W. Seymour, V.X. Liu, T.J. Iwashyna, F.M. Brunkhorst, T.D. Rea, A. Scherag, et al.
Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3).
JAMA, 315 (2016), pp. 762-774
[5]
J. Räsänen, J.B. Downs, D.J. Malec, B. DeHaven, W.L. Garner.
Real-time continuous estimation of gas exchange by dual oximetry.
Intensive Care Med, 14 (1988), pp. 118-122
[6]
D.S. Karbing, S. Kjaergaard, B.W. Smith, K. Espersen, C. Allerød, S. Andreassen, et al.
Variation in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio with FiO2: mathematical and experimental description, and clinical relevance.
Crit Care, 11 (2007), pp. R118
[7]
F.R. Bashar, A. Vahedian-Azimi, B. Farzanegan, R. Goharani, S. Shojaei, S. Hatamian, et al.
Comparison of non-invasive to invasive oxygenation ratios for diagnosing acute respiratory distress syndrome following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective derivation-validation cohort study.
J Cardiothorac Surg, 13 (2018), pp. 123
[8]
W. Chen, D.R. Janz, C.M. Shaver, G.R. Bernard, J.A. Bastarache, L.B. Ware.
Clinical characteristics and outcomes are similar in ARDS diagnosed by oxygen saturation/FiO2 ratio compared with PaO2/FiO2 ratio.
Chest, 148 (2015), pp. 1477-1483
[9]
J.Y. Adams, A.J. Rogers, A. Schuler, G.P. Marelich, J.M. Fresco, S.L. Taylor, et al.
Association between peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO(2))/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) ratio time at risk and hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated patients.
Perm J, (2020), pp. 24
[10]
L. Pisani, J.P. Roozeman, F.D. Simonis, A. Giangregorio, S.M. van der Hoeven, L.R. Schouten, et al.
Risk stratification using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP at initial ARDS diagnosis and after 24h in patients with moderate or severe ARDS.
Ann Intensive Care, 7 (2017), pp. 108
[11]
C. Cinesi-Gómez, P. García-García, I. López-Pelayo, J.I. Giménez, L.M. González-Torres, E. Bernal-Morell.
Correlation between oxyhaemoglobin saturation by pulse oximetry and partial pressure of oxygen in patients with acute respiratory failure.
Rev Clin Esp, 217 (2017), pp. 522-525
[12]
S.M. Brown, A. Duggal, P.C. Hou, M. Tidswell, A. Khan, M. Exline, et al.
Nonlinear imputation of PaO2/FIO2 From SpO2/FIO2 among mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU: a prospective, observational study.
Crit Care Med, 45 (2017), pp. 1317-1324
[13]
S.M. Brown, C.K. Grissom, M. Moss, T.W. Rice, D. Schoenfeld, P.C. Hou, et al.
Nonlinear imputation of PaO2/FiO2 from SpO2/FiO2 among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
[14]
T.W. Rice, A.P. Wheeler, G.R. Bernard, D.L. Hayden, D.A. Schoenfeld, L.B. Ware.
Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS.
Chest, 132 (2007), pp. 410-417
[15]
P.P. Pandharipande, A.K. Shintani, H.E. Hagerman, P.J. St Jacques, T.W. Rice, N.W. Sanders, et al.
Derivation and validation of SpO2/FiO2 ratio to impute for PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the respiratory component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score.
Crit Care Med, 37 (2009), pp. 1317-1321
[16]
A.I. Batchinsky, D. Wendorff, J. Jones, B. Beely, T. Roberts, J.H. Choi, et al.
Noninvasive SpO2/FiO2 ratio as surrogate for PaO2/FiO2 ratio during simulated prolonged field care and ground and high-altitude evacuation.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 89 (2020), pp. S126-S131
[17]
W. Alhazzani, M.H. Møller, Y.M. Arabi, M. Loeb, M.N. Gong, E. Fan, et al.
Surviving sepsis campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Intensive Care Med, 46 (2020), pp. 854-887
[18]
M. Briel, M. Meade, A. Mercat, R.G. Brower, D. Talmor, S.D. Walter, et al.
Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.
JAMA, 303 (2010), pp. 865-873
[19]
C. Guérin, J. Reignier, J.-C. Richard, P. Beuret, A. Gacouin, T. Boulain, et al.
Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.
N Engl J Med, 368 (2013), pp. 2159-2168
[20]
L. Papazian, J.M. Forel, A. Gacouin, C. Penot-Ragon, G. Perrin, A. Loundou, et al.
Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome.
N Engl J Med, 363 (2010), pp. 1107-1116
[21]
J.W. Severinghaus.
Simple, accurate equations for human blood O2 dissociation computations.
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol, 46 (1979), pp. 599-602
[22]
R.K. Ellis.
Determination of PO2 from saturation.
J Appl Physiol (1985), 67 (1989), pp. 902
[23]
F. Esteve, J.C. Lopez-Delgado, C. Javierre, K. Skaltsa, M.L. Carrio, D. Rodríguez-Castro, et al.
Evaluation of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio after cardiac surgery as a predictor of outcome during hospital stay.
BMC Anesthesiol, 14 (2014), pp. 83
[24]
S.M. Gadrey, C.E. Lau, R. Clay, G.T. Rhodes, D.E. Lake, C.C. Moore, et al.
Imputation of partial pressures of arterial oxygen using oximetry and its impact on sepsis diagnosis.
Physiol Meas, 40 (2019), pp. 115008
[25]
E.M.J. Durlinger, A.M.E. Spoelstra-de Man, B. Smit, H.J. de Grooth, A.R.J. Girbes, H.M. Oudemans-van Straaten, et al.
Hyperoxia: at what level of SpO(2) is a patient safe? A study in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.
J Crit Care, 39 (2017), pp. 199-204
[26]
M. Gonzalez-Garcia, D. Maldonado, M. Barrero, A. Casas, R. Perez-Padilla, C.A. Torres-Duque.
Arterial blood gases and ventilation at rest by age and sex in an adult Andean population resident at high altitude.
Eur J Appl Physiol, 120 (2020), pp. 2729-2736
[27]
M. Jibaja, G. Ortiz-Ruiz, F. García, M. Garay-Fernández, F. de Jesús Montelongo, J. Martinez, et al.
Hospital mortality and effect of adjusting PaO(2)/FiO(2) according to altitude above the sea level in acclimatized patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. a multicenter study.
Arch Bronconeumol, 56 (2020), pp. 218-224
Copyright © 2021. Elsevier España, S.L.U. y SEMICYUC
Idiomas
Medicina Intensiva

Suscríbase a la newsletter

Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
Material suplementario
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?