Septic shock remains the most frequent cause of death in non-coronary intensive care units.1,2 It is characterized by hemodynamic alterations associated with organ dysfunction. Although systemic oxygen transport is usually preserved after the resuscitation of septic shock, multiorgan failure frequently develops as a probable consequence of an imbalance between oxygen delivery and consumption (DO2 and VO2) at tissue level. Microcirculatory dysfunction could be involved in this phenomenon.

The microcirculatory derangements caused by sepsis consist in decreased functional vascular density and heterogeneity of capillary transit-time.3–7 They may persist despite the normalization of systemic hemodynamics and oxygen transport in the large blood vessels, having relevant prognostic implications. It is well known that recovery of macrohemodynamic stability does not necessarily involve a parallel enhancement in microcirculation, organ function restoration, and a subsequent better prognosis.8–10 Therefore, some macrohaemodynamical markers such as blood pressure, cardiac output, and other systemic cardiovascular variables are not reliable predictors of the evolution of septic shock.11 In contrast, the assessment of oxygen release to the peripheral tissues would better reflect the microcirculation status.

However, peripheral oxygenation depends on many different factors including the ensemble of small vessels, local blood flow, hemoglobin content and oxygen partial pressure, among others.6 This complexity has meant that clinicians have not been able to assess the status of microcirculation and peripheral tissue oxygenation at the bedside until last years. Nevertheless, both can be easily approximated with Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS)12 through determination of skeletal muscle oxygen tissue saturation (StO2) or skeletal muscle oxygen saturation index (rSO2) depending on the device used. StO2 is a measure of oxygen saturation in the microcirculation where oxygen is exchanged with tissue and it is usually measured in the thenar eminence. On the other hand, rSO2 (“regional”) value is an index of the OxyHb present within a volume of tissue (expressed as the percentage of oxygenated hemoglobin relative to total) and it can be easily assessed in other locations.

In this regard, both have demonstrated its prognostic value in septic shock.13–18 In addition to simple determination of StO2, several studies have evaluated the behavior of this variable during an ischemic challenge (vascular occlusion test, VOT) in septic shock patients.19–26 This test assesses the reactivity of small vessels and appears to improve the predictive ability of simple StO2 determination.19

We have previously showed the relevance of measuring rSO2 at the brachioradialis muscle as an outcome predictor in septic shock.17,18 The behavior of skeletal brachioradialis rSO2 in response to VOT and its relationship to mortality in such patients has not been assessed yet. We hypothesized that this test can further improve the predictive value of simple rSO2 measurement in the brachioradialis muscle of septic shock patients as StO2 in the thenar eminence. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to compare the prognostic implications relate to mortality of rSO2 static and dynamic variables in the brachioradialis muscle of septic shock patients.

The investigation was conducted according to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for studies in humans. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee at our institution, and informed consent was given by each patient or their next of kin.

Thirty-five patients with septic shock (68±11 years of age, 48.6% males) and twenty healthy volunteers (55±8 years of age, 45% males) were finally included. Only three patients were not included because exclusion criteria: two patients with diabetes requiring insulin therapy and one patient with chronic renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis. The main characteristics of patients are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Abdomen was the most common source of infection (37.1%), followed by community-acquired pneumonia (25.7%), urinary tract infections (14.3%) and others. Even though the differences did not reach statistical significance, non-survivors had more tachycardia, hyperlactatemia, acidosis and norepinephrine dosing compared with survivors.

NIRS measurements

The main results obtained with NIRS are shown in Fig. 1. Briefly, septic shock patients showed lower baseline rSO2 compared with healthy controls (63.8±12.2 vs. 69.3±3.3%, p<0.05). Moreover, the DeOx obtained in the ischemic phase and the ReOx slopes obtained in the reperfusion phase (total ReOx and at 12s) were slower in septic shock patients (−0.54±0.31 vs. −0.91±0.35%/s, p=0.001; 2.67±2.17 vs. 9.46±3.5%/s, p<0.001; and 3.64±3.32 vs. 13.15±6.07%/s, p<0.001). The same accounted for the delta value (3.25±5.71 vs. 15.1±3.9%, p<0.001) being the maximum rSO2 post-reperfusion greater in the control group (67.48±12.55 vs. 84.45±3.92, p<0.001). No differences were found in the minimum rSO2 between groups.

Figure 1.

rSO2 curve variables in septic shock patients (n=35) and healthy volunteers (n=20). (a) Baseline rSO2; (b) maximum rSO2 during the reperfusion; (c) deoxygenation rate; (d) reoxygenation rate; (e) slope in the firsts 12s; (f) difference between baseline rSO2 and its maximum value.

(0,19MB).

We just observed significant correlation between the SOFA score at ICU admission and DeOx slope at 12s (−0.369, p=0.034). No other correlations with significant values were observed.

The study suggests that among septic shock patients, baseline rSO2 differed between survivors and non-survivors and was able to predict mortality. On the contrary and against our hypothesis, dynamic variables obtained with our device did not differ between survivors and non-survivors. To our knowledge this prospective study is the first to assess the microcirculatory dysfunction in this muscle after an ischemic challenge and to study its association with mortality.

Although NIRS rSO2 is a measure of muscle tissue oxygenation and not a direct marker of microcirculatory perfusion, it permits the quantification of the microcirculatory dysfunction.32 NIRS during a VOT might give additional information about local VO2, reactive hyperemia, and microcirculation recruitment and it seems to be sensitive to the progress and outcome of sepsis in clinical illness.19,20,25,26

Several studies have assessed the microvascular reactivity in the thenar eminence in sepsis with other NIRS devices.13,15,16,19–26 Most of them found differences in the baseline StO2 between septic patients and healthy volunteers.13,15,16,19–21,24,26 In this sense, Leone et al.13 found that StO2 static values were significantly lower in the non-survivors than in survivors septic shock patients. In contrast, some of them22,23,25 did not show differences between both groups. However, in these studies dynamic NIRS improved the discrimination power between normal and abnormal states of microcirculation. Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis that included twenty articles dealing with the prognostic implications of StO2, showed that the static value is lower in septic patients than in control subjects.14

Our group have recently demonstrated that in septic shock throughout the first 24h after ICU admission, the patients with brachioradialis skeletal muscle rSO2<60% had significantly greater mortality than patients with rSO2>60% in the same location.17 Accordingly to these data, in the present study we confirm that brachioradialis baseline rSO2 is a good prognostic predictor in this group of patients and that the cut-off value of 60% presents a good sensitivity for mortality prediction. Furthermore, in this study we improved the methodology of our previous work using a dynamic test.

Most of the studies that analyze the association between static and dynamic NIRS variables and mortality in septic shock patients were conducted in the thenar eminence with other NIRS devices. In one hand, in these studies static thenar StO2 was variably reported as associated13,14 or not associated19,20,25 with mortality. On the other hand, some of these studies demonstrated that the recovery slope outperformed the other NIRS-derived variables because it was more strongly associated with organ dysfunction and mortality.19,20,25

In this sense, Creteur et al.19 showed a significant association between a reduced reperfusion slope after VOT and mortality in septic shock patients while there were no differences in the static parameters between patients and control subjects neither in mortality. Payen et al.20 also showed a depressed reperfusion slope in non-survivors septic shock patients compared with survivors with a significant ROC curve for the prediction of mortality. They also showed a lower static StO2 in patients than in healthy subjects but without any difference between survivors and non-survivors. In the same way, Shapiro et al.25 observed that baseline StO2 did not discriminate between septic shock patients and control subjects, while the deoxygenation and recovery slope distinguish them. Non-survivors presented slower slopes than survivors with a relevant ROC curve.

Mesquida et al.26 also reported that in a population of septic shock patients impaired DeOx was associated with no improvement in organ failures after 24h. They did not found differences in baseline StO2 between SOFA improvers and SOFA non-improvers patients.

Finally, Neto et al.14 in the meta-analysis above mentioned, concluded that static StO2 distinguish between survivors and non-survivors septic shock patients, just like reoxygenation slope.

More recently, different groups have evaluated the microcirculation by NIRS in other locations in order to find better anatomic sites with different results.15–18

Ait-Oufella et al.15 evaluated the prognostic value of StO2 measured around the knee in septic shock patients and compared it with thenar eminence StO2. They concluded that after initial septic shock resuscitation, StO2 measured around the knee is a strong predictive factor of 14-day mortality. In the same way, Colin et al.16 demonstrated that masseter and deltoid StO2, but not thenar StO2 were strong predictors of 28-day mortality.

We recently have assessed and compared rSO2 obtained simultaneously in two different muscles, brachioradialis and deltoid.18 Our results showed that both measurements present a strong correlation and adequate consistency and both muscles also showed consistent discriminatory power for mortality.

Our present results are in accordance with these data, showing that static rSO2 measurements in the brachioradialis muscle are good predictors of mortality. Although some articles showed that dynamic tests improve the prognostic value of the static parameters in the thenar eminence, our results show that VOT test in brachioradialis muscle of septic shock patients is not better to assess the microcirculatory alterations. Static NIRS data in this location is easier to obtain and better mortality predictor than dynamic parameters. However, it has to be taken into account that the studies without differences in dynamic tests between survivors and non-survivors included a small sample size. Future studies with a large number of patients will be necessaries to elucidate this debate.

Although skeletal muscle StO2 may be equivalent to rSO2, they are obtained with different devices and the values are calculated with different algorithms. For this reason it is difficult to compare both parameters between them. However, further studies will be necessary to compare the prognostic value of the static NIRS measurements in the thenar eminence and in the other muscles. Muscle myofiber composition, oxygen consumption and metabolism may differ between these muscles and it may contribute to these differences. In addition, thenar muscle may be more influenced by abnormal peripheral perfusion than the other territories,33 a major confounder in assessing StO2.34

In other way and in contrast with the reported in the literature, we did not found differences in SOFA Score at admission between survivors and non-survivors due to the small sample size. Even though some differences did not reach statistical significance, non-survivors patients had more tachycardia, hyperlactatemia and norepinephrine dosing. These results are in accordance with Edul et al.35 who recently demonstrated the association of microcirculatory alterations with these three variables in septic shock patients.

This study and the NIRS technology have some limitations that should be taken into account. First of all, the methodologies for assessing the microcirculation by NIRS are very inconsistent in the literature, and consequently, results vary from study to study, making data comparison difficult and potentially inadequate. Two major aspects concerning the inconsistent methodology are measurement site and probe spacing. The measurement site is important because differences may exist in the sensitivity of muscle groups and/or other anatomical structures to the VOT during health and/or pathophysiological conditions. Probe spacing, on the other hand, will determine the depth of measurement within the respective muscle group. To address these issues, Bezemer et al.36 demonstrated in healthy subjects that although not apparent at baseline, the probe spacing and measurement site significantly influenced VOT-derived StO2 variables. In addition, the optimal way of performing VOT is a matter of debate.37,38 Second, we have assessed microvascular dysfunction within the firsts 24h of the septic shock diagnosis, but the time of measurement also varies between the different studies and it could be a confounding factor. Further studies will be necessary to check the utility of NIRS parameters along the time and their changes with the treatment. Third, to our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluates every NIRS-derived variable in the braquioradialis muscle. Although increased thickness of the subcutaneous layer due to edema may reduce the muscle layer assessed, this was not a major problem in our study, since the tissue edema was an exclusion criteria. In any case, we evaluated the NIRS variables in the early phase of septic shock before the development of significant edema.

We conclude that baseline rSO2 obtained at the braquioradialis muscle is a good predictor of mortality in septic shock. In our population, VOT-derived variables in this muscle does not seem to improve the prognostic value of the static parameters. Future studies will be necessaries to confirm our results and to evaluate the usefulness of these parameters to evaluate the microcirculatory response to treatment.

None.