Suggestions
Share
Journal Information
Visits
192
Letter to the Editor
Full text access
Available online 7 October 2025
Airway management in critically ill patients. The need to adapt guidelines to our reality and adhere to them
El manejo de la vía aérea en el paciente crítico. Necesidad de adaptar las guías a nuestra realidad y nosotros adherirnos a ellas
Visits
192
Francisco Ramón Pampín Huerta
Corresponding author
franpampin@yahoo.es

Corresponding author.
, Gonzalo Pardo Peña, Dolores Moreira Gómez, María Pilar Madruga Garrido
Médico Especialista de Medicina Intensiva, Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital HM Modelo, A Coruña, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text
Dear Editor:

Albillos-Almaraz et al. addressed relevant aspects of airway (AW) management in critically ill patients and proposed a highly appropriate classification of difficult airway (DA).

They argue that the guidelines for the management of DA diverge from the daily reality of the critically ill patient.1 However, we must acknowledge that all these clinical practice guidelines set forth a series of mandatory recommendations that we often overlook in practice—capnography in waveform format being one of them.2,3

The INTUPROS study shows that in more than 80% of patients in Spanish intensive care units (ICUs), the position used during intubation is supine; preoxygenation is performed with a resuscitation bag; the first device used is the laryngoscope; neuromuscular blockers are not administered in all patients; and the use of capnography is limited.4 In contrast, the strong recommendations of the guidelines advocate elevating the head of the bed, preoxygenating with noninvasive ventilation (NIV), using a videolaryngoscope as the first device, administering appropriate neuromuscular blockade, and routine waveform capnography.2,3

Preoxygenation for 3min with a ventilator in noninvasive mode (FiO₂ 100%, PEEP 5cm H2O, pressure support 5–15cm H2O to achieve a tidal volume of 6–8mL/kg)3 delivered via a conventional face mask should be the method of choice for all patients categorized by Albillos-Almaraz et al. as elective or emergencyt DA.1 Manual ventilation with a resuscitation bag and face mask should be applied only as bailout therapy in the event of failure of the first AW isolation plan,3 in those patients fitting the description of emergent DA,1 or cautiously during the apneic phase of rapid sequence intubation.2

To achieve an appropriate success rate with videolaryngoscope intubation, it is essential to complete the recommended learning curve for each device and avoid their use in unfavorable circumstances (e.g., presence of secretions or blood obscuring the lens). Regarding supraglottic devices, we consider that the Fastrach™ laryngeal mask should always be available as a bailout option in the event of failure of initial AW isolation plans, as it permits ventilation and blind intubation with a high success rate and minimal prior training.

The rate of severe adverse events during intubation of critically ill patients ranges between 40% and 45% according to studies,2,4 and failure to use waveform capnography has been identified as one of the causes.5 Therefore, routine use of capnography should be a key area for improvement, especially since INTUPROS data show utilization in our ICUs < 12%.4

We believe that the first step to improving one of the procedures associated with such a high rate of severe complications should be adherence to the recommendations of the major management guidelines.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

All authors actively participated in the literature search, drafting of the manuscript, and revision of the different versions.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

No AI was used at any stage of the process.

Funding

None declared.

References
[1]
R. Albillos-Almaraz, S. Balboa-Palomino, E. Pérez-Cabo.
El manejo de la vía aérea en el paciente crítico. Necesidad de un nuevo enfoque.
[2]
K. Karamchandani, P. Nasa, M. Jarzebowski, D.J. Brewster, A. De Jong, P.R. Bauer, et al.
Tracheal intubation in critically ill adults with a physiologically difficult airway. An international Delphi study.
Intensive Care Med, 50 (2024), pp. 1563-1579
[3]
A. Higgs, B.A. McGrath, C. Goddard, J. Rangasami, G. Suntharalingam, R. Gale, et al.
Guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults.
Br J Anaesth, 120 (2018), pp. 323-352
[4]
J. Garnacho-Montero, E. Gordillo-Escobar, J. Trenado, F. Gordo, L. Fisac, E. García-Prieto, et al.
A Nationwide, prospective study of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults in Spain: Management, Associated Complications, and Outcomes.
Crit Care Med, 52 (2024), pp. 786-797
[5]
T.M. Cook, N. Woodall, J. Harper, J. Benger, Fourth National Audit Project.
Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments.
Br J Anaesth, 106 (2011), pp. 632-642
Copyright © 2025. Elsevier España, S.L.U. and SEMICYUC
Download PDF
Idiomas
Medicina Intensiva (English Edition)
Article options
Tools