Journal Information
Vol. 48. Issue 10.
Pages 594-601 (October 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
3
Vol. 48. Issue 10.
Pages 594-601 (October 2024)
Original article
Effects of PEEP on intracranial pressure in patients with acute brain injury: An observational, prospective and multicenter study
Efectos de la PEEP sobre la Presión Intracraneal en pacientes con lesion cerebral aguda: estudio prospectivo, observacional y multicéntrico
Visits
3
Jesús Abelardo Barea-Mendoza, Zaira Molina-Collado, María Ángeles Ballesteros-Sanz, Luisa Corral-Ansa, Maite Misis del Campo, Cándido Pardo-Rey, Juan Angel Tihista-Jiménez, Carmen Corcobado-Márquez, Juan Pedro Martín del Rincón, Juan Antonio Llompart-Pou, Luis Alfonso Marcos-Prieto, Ander Olazabal-Martínez, Rubén Herrán-Monge, Ana María Díaz-Lamas, Mario Chico-Fernández
Corresponding author
Intensive Medicine Department, UCI de Trauma y Emergencias, UCITE, Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (3)
Show moreShow less
Tables (2)
Table 1. Ventilatory, hemodynamic and neuromonitoring responses to PEEP increase (n = 138 episodes).
Table 2. Ventilatory, hemodynamic and neuromonitoring responses to PEEP decrease (n = 66 episodes).
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Objective

To analyze the impact of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) changes on intracranial pressure (ICP) dynamics in patients with acute brain injury (ABI).

Design

Observational, prospective and multicenter study (PEEP-PIC study).

Setting

Seventeen intensive care units in Spain.

Patients

Neurocritically ill patients who underwent invasive neuromonitorization from November 2017 to June 2018.

Interventions

Baseline ventilatory, hemodynamic and neuromonitoring variables were collected immediately before PEEP changes and during the following 30 min.

Main variables of interest

PEEP and ICP changes.

Results

One-hundred and nine patients were included. Mean age was 52.68 (15.34) years, male 71 (65.13%). Traumatic brain injury was the cause of ABI in 54 (49.54%) patients. Length of mechanical ventilation was 16.52 (9.23) days. In-hospital mortality was 21.1%. PEEP increases (mean 6.24–9.10 cmH2O) resulted in ICP increase from 10.4 to 11.39 mmHg, P < .001, without changes in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) (P = .548). PEEP decreases (mean 8.96 to 6.53 cmH2O) resulted in ICP decrease from 10.5 to 9.62 mmHg (P = .052), without changes in CPP (P = .762). Significant correlations were established between the increase of ICP and the delta PEEP (R = 0.28, P < .001), delta driving pressure (R = 0.15, P = .038) and delta compliance (R = −0.14, P = .052). ICP increment was higher in patients with lower baseline ICP.

Conclusions

PEEP changes were not associated with clinically relevant modifications in ICP values in ABI patients. The magnitude of the change in ICP after PEEP increase was correlated with the delta of PEEP, the delta driving pressure and the delta compliance.

Keywords:
Acute brain injury
Intracranial pressure
Positive end-expiratory pressure
Mechanical ventilation
Neurocritical care
Resumen
Objetivo

Analizar el impacto de los cambios en la Presión positiva al final de la espiración (PEEP) sobre la Presión Intracraneal (PIC) en pacientes con lesión cerebral aguda (ABI).

Diseño

Estudio prospectivo, observacional y multicéntrico (PEEP-PIC).

Ámbito

Diecisiete Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos en España.

Pacientes

Pacientes neurocríticos que recibieron monitorización invasiva de la PIC desde Noviembre 2017 hasta Junio 2018.

Intervenciones

Se recogieron los parámetros ventilatorios, hemodinámicos y variables de neuromonitorización inmediatamente antes de las modificaciones de la PEEP y durante los 30 minutos posteriores.

Variables de interés principales

PEEP y cambios en la PIC.

Resultados

Se incluyeron 109 pacientes. Edad media 52,68 (15,34) años, hombres 71 (65,13%). La causa de lesión cerebral fue traumática en 54 pacientes (49,54%). La estancia media fue de 16,52 (9,23) días. La mortalidad hospitalaria fue del 21,1%. Los aumentos de PEEP (media 6,24 a 9,10 cmH2O) resultaron en un aumento de la PIC de 10,4 a 11,39 mmHg, P < .001, sin cambios en la PPC (P = ,548). Los descensos de la PEEP (media 8,96 a 6,53 cmH2O) resultaron en un descenso de la PIC de 10,5 a 9,62 mmHg (P = ,052), sin cambios en la PPC (P = ,762). Se establecieron correlaciones significativas entre el aumento de PIC y el delta de PEEP (R = 0,28, P < ,001), el delta driving pressure (R = 0,15, P = ,038) y el delta de complianza (R = −0,14, P = ,052). El aumento de PIC fue mayor en pacientes con PIC basal baja.

Conclusiones

Los cambios en la PEEP no se asociaron a cambios clínicamente relevantes en la PIC de los pacientes con lesion cerebral aguda. La magnitud del aumento de la PIC tras el aumento de PEEP se correlacionó con el delta PEEP, delta driving pressure y el delta complianza.

Palabras clave:
Lesión cerebral
Presión intracraneal
Ventilación mecánica
Neurocríticos

Article

These are the options to access the full texts of the publication Medicina Intensiva (English Edition)
Member
If you are a member of the Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias::
Go to the members area of the website of the SEMICYUC (www.semicyuc.org )and click the link to the magazine.
Subscriber
Subscriber

If you already have your login data, please click here .

If you have forgotten your password you can you can recover it by clicking here and selecting the option “I have forgotten my password”
Subscribe
Subscribe to

Medicina Intensiva (English Edition)

Purchase
Purchase article

Purchasing article the PDF version will be downloaded

Price 19.34 €

Purchase now
Contact
Phone for subscriptions and reporting of errors
From Monday to Friday from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. (GMT + 1) except for the months of July and August which will be from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Calls from Spain
932 415 960
Calls from outside Spain
+34 932 415 960
Email
Idiomas
Medicina Intensiva (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?