Journal Information
Vol. 35. Issue 5.
Pages 267-269 (June - July 2011)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 35. Issue 5.
Pages 267-269 (June - July 2011)
Editorial
Full text access
Clinical Significance of Acute Coronary Syndrome with Transient ST-Segment Elevation
Significado clínico del síndrome coronario agudo con elevación transitoria del segmento ST
Visits
1909
J. Latour-Péreza,
Corresponding author
jlatour@coma.es

Corresponding author.
, J.B. Cabellob
a Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain
b Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Coordinación de CASP-España, Alicante, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

The electrocardiographic evidence of injury appears in the presence of evident diastolic depolarization due to an important reduction in blood supply or other non-ischemic causal factors. This in turn leads to a “defective” transmembrane action potential reflected upon the ECG tracing as an ST-segment deviation. When diastolic depolarization occurs at subendocardial level, an ST-segment descent appears on the ECG, while depolarization at subepicardial (or transmural) level gives rise to ST-segment elevation.1

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the ST-segment elevation pattern is associated to rupture or fissuring of an unstable atheroma plaque, with acute thrombotic occlusion of an epicardial artery in a patient without previous important ischemia (ACS with ST-segment elevation [ACSSTE]). When occlusion is incomplete or distal flow is present thanks to collateral circulation, ST-segment elevation is not observed (ACS without ST-segment elevation [ACSWSTE]).1–4 The initial management of ACSSTE involves emergency aperture of permeation of the affected artery through pharmacological (thrombolysis) or mechanical means (percutaneous revascularization). In contrast, thrombolysis is not effective in ACSWSTE, and coronary revascularization in such cases is not an immediate emergency concern.2–4

In a small group of patients ST-segment elevation is transient (less than 20min). According to the current criteria of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology,3 such cases correspond to patients with a “predominance of ST-segment elevation” that are in turn subclassified according to the degree of elevation of the myocardial necrosis markers as either “aborted infarctions” or “infarctions without ST-segment elevation”. The main ACS management guides have not defined a specific designation for these patients, and include ACS with transient ST-segment elevation within the group of ACSWSTE.2

In this number of Medicina Intensiva, Arroyo-Úcar et al.5 report that patients with ACS and transient ST-segment elevation exhibit a characteristic profile that differentiates them from the rest of patients with ACSWSTE: younger age, a greater prevalence of males and smokers, a lesser elevation of the necrosis markers, a greater ejection fraction and a higher prevalence of single-vessel disease.

These results are consistent with those of the previous studies. In this context, Drew et al.,6 in a study involving continuous ST-segment monitorization, found patients with episodes of ST-segment elevation to have a greater frequency of single-vessel disease, while patients with ST-segment depression showed more frequent multivessel disease.

In turn, Meisel et al.7 found that in comparison with the group of patients with persistent ST-segment elevation, those with ACS and transient ST-segment elevation showed a lesser creatine kinase peak, a greater ejection fraction, less extensive coronary disease, a greater prevalence of TIMI III flow, and fewer coronary events over the course of follow-up.

This profile of limited myocardial damage with normal systolic function refers us to the known good prognosis of patients with ACSSTE that normalize their ST-segment after thrombolysis,8,9 or to the patients subjected to primary percutaneous coronary revascularization with initial TIMI III flow.10 However, in the recent metaanalysis of individual patients included in the FRISC-II, RITA and ICTUS trials, the cardiovascular mortality or infarction risk was found to be practically identical in the patients with transient elevation of depression of the ST-segment (19.2% versus 19.4%, respectively).11

Some authors have suggested that initial conservative management may be indicated in these cases, considering their supposedly good prognosis.12 However, as correctly commented by Arroyo-Úcar et al., the treatment of ACS with transient ST-segment elevation has not been well established, and the ACSWSTE management guides offer no specific recommendations for such cases.2,4 Therefore, an important gap in knowledge is found in this field that must be filled by future research work.

It should be mentioned that the study of ACS with transient ST-segment elevation poses some specific difficulties. Firstly, transient ST-segment elevation is not a nosologic entity as such but rather a clinical sign that may be due to causes other than coronary thrombosis, such as coronary vasospasm (variant angina) or transient apical dysfunction syndrome (tako-tsubo syndrome),13 among other anecdotal conditions14–17 with different therapeutic connotations. On the other hand, the dividing or differentiating lines between some of these disease conditions have not been well defined.18 The section of the ARIAM study corresponding to 2010 identified 64 patients with transient ST-segment elevation out of a total of 1379 patients with an initial diagnosis of ACS (4.6%); of these, 3 were classified as corresponding to Prinzmetal angina, 12 as unstable angina (“aborted infarctions”), 45 as infarctions, and 4 as other conditions/causes (unpublished data).

Secondly, the dynamic nature of ACS must be stressed, with frequent episodes of myocardial ischemia due to thrombus formation and lysis, intermittent vasoconstriction and platelet thrombus embolization.19 As an example, we can consider the case of a patient with persistent subepicardial damage secondary to thrombotic occlusion of an artery, exhibiting spontaneous reperfusion. Depending on the moment of the ECG recording, the patient may be classified as presenting ACSSTE (early ECG), ACS with transient ST-segment elevation (ECG tracing immediately before reperfusion), or ACSWSTE (late ECG tracing).

In principle, continuous ST-segment monitoring with multiple leads could obviate the low sensitivity associated with surface ECG recordings in detecting transient ST-segment elevation. Caution is required, however, since studies with conventional ECG and those based on continuous ECG monitorization differ not only in the diagnostic tool used but also in the population under evaluation. In the former case, subjects with transient ST-segment elevation are patients who have probably experienced spontaneous reperfusion. The latter case in turn corresponds to individuals who continue to suffer ischemic episodes, and is therefore at an increased risk of developing coronary events.20,21

In any case, the scientific evidence regarding the management of these patients should be derived from randomized clinical trials involving patients with ACS with transient ST-segment elevation. Until such information becomes available, non-randomized studies fitting for treatment tendencies or systematic reviews of randomized trials (analyses of subgroups according to the initial ECG pattern) could contribute useful evidence for decision taking in this important group of patients.

References
[1]
A. Bayés de Luna, M. Fiol-Sala.
Electrocardiographic pattern of injury: ST-segment abnormalities. Electrocardiography in ischemic heart disease. Clinical and imaging correlations and prognostic implications.
Blackwell Futura, (2008),
[2]
J.P. Bassand, C.W. Hamm, D. Ardissino, E. Boersma, A. Budaj, F. Fernandez-Aviles, et al.
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.
Eur Heart J, 28 (2007), pp. 1598-1660
[3]
K. Nikus, O. Pahlm, G. Wagner, Y. Birnbaum, J. Cinca, P. Clemmensen, et al.
Electrocardiographic classification of acute coronary syndromes: a review by a committee of the International Society for Holter and Non-Invasive Electrocardiology.
J Electrocardiol, 43 (2010), pp. 91-103
[4]
E. Civeira Murillo, F. Del Nogal Saez, A.P. Álvarez Ruiz, J. Ferrero Zorita, A. Alcantara, G.H. Aguado, et al.
Recomendaciones para el diagnóstico y tratamiento del síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST.
Med Intensiva, 34 (2010), pp. 22-45
[5]
E. Arroyo Úcar, A. Domínguez-Rodríguez, R. Juárez Prera, G. Blanco Palacios, C. Hernández García, M. Carrillo-Pérez Tome, et al.
Características diferenciales de los pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST con respecto a los que tienen elevación transitoria del segmento ST.
Med Intensiva, 35 (2011), pp. 270-273
[6]
B.J. Drew, M.M. Pelter, M.G. Adams.
Frequency, characteristics, and clinical significance of transient ST segment elevation in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Eur Heart J, 23 (2002), pp. 941-947
[7]
S.R. Meisel, Y. Dagan, D.S. Blondheim, S. Dacca, M. Shochat, M. Kazatsker, et al.
Transient ST-elevation myocardial infarction: clinical course with intense medical therapy and early invasive approach, and comparison with persistent ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Am Heart J, 155 (2008), pp. 848-854
[8]
J.A. De Lemos, E.M. Antman, R.P. Giugliano, C.H. McCabe, S.A. Murphy, F. Van de Werf, et al.
ST-segment resolution and infarct-related artery patency and flow after thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 14 investigators.
Am J Cardiol, 85 (2000), pp. 299-304
[9]
T. Taher, Y. Fu, G.S. Wagner, S.G. Goodman, C. Fresco, C.B. Granger, et al.
Aborted myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation: insights from the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen-3 Trial Electrocardiographic Substudy.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 44 (2004), pp. 38-43
[10]
G.W. Stone, D. Cox, E. Garcia, B.R. Brodie, M.C. Morice, J. Griffin, et al.
Normal flow (TIMI-3) before mechanical reperfusion therapy is an independent determinant of survival in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials.
Circulation, 104 (2001), pp. 636-641
[11]
K.A. Fox, T.C. Clayton, P. Damman, S.J. Pocock, R.J. De Winter, J.G. Tijssen, et al.
Long-term outcome of a routine versus selective invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome a meta-analysis of individual patient data.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 55 (2010), pp. 2435-2445
[12]
O.M. Jolobe.
Transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Am Heart J, 156 (2008), pp. e39
[13]
F. Del Nogal Saez, E. Meyer Garcia-Sipido, M. Villar Molina, M.A. Blasco Navalpotro, R. Diaz Abad, J.M. Grande Ingelmo, et al.
Discinesia transitoria del ventrículo izquierdo. Presentación de nuestra casuística.
[14]
A. Domínguez-Rodríguez, P. Abreu-González, C. Enjuanes-Grau, G. Blanco-Palacios, M.L. Ángeles Perez-Carrillo, G. Burillo-Putze.
Estrés oxidativo y marcadores de inflamación en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo consumidores de cocaína.
Med Clin (Barc), 134 (2010), pp. 152-155
[15]
D. Kilic, H. Evrengul, A.V. Ozcan, H. Tanriverdi, O. Cagliyan, A. Kaftan, Acute ST.
segment elevation myocardial infarction after sulbactam-ampicilllin induced anaphylactic shock in an adult with significant coronary artery disease: a case report.
Int J Cardiol, 135 (2009), pp. e30-e33
[16]
Rekik S, Andrieu S, Aboukhoudir F, Barnay P, Quaino G, Pansieri M, et al. ST elevation myocardial infarction with no structural lesions after a wasp sting. J Emerg Med. 2009 (in press).
[17]
E. Tsiamis, K. Toutouzas, C. Stefanadis.
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a pre-menopausal woman presenting with transient ST segment elevation.
Heart, 89 (2003), pp. 1326
[18]
B. Ibañez, B.G. Choi, F. Navarro, J. Farre.
Tako-tsubo syndrome: a form of spontaneous aborted myocardial infarction?.
Eur Heart J, 27 (2006), pp. 1509-1510
[19]
T. Jernberg, B. Lindahl, L. Wallentin.
Continuous multilead ST-segment monitoring should be a part of the clinical routine.
Eur Heart J, 23 (2002), pp. 918-921
[20]
S.O. Gottlieb, M.L. Weisfeldt, P. Ouyang, E.D. Mellits, G. Gerstenblith.
Silent ischemia as a marker for early unfavorable outcomes in patients with unstable angina.
N Engl J Med, 314 (1986), pp. 1214-1219
[21]
D.J. Patel, C.J. Knight, D.R. Holdright, D. Mulcahy, D. Clarke, C. Wright, et al.
Long-term prognosis in unstable angina. The importance of early risk stratification using continuous ST segment monitoring.
Eur Heart J, 19 (1998), pp. 240-249

Please cite this article as: Latour-Pérez J, Cabello JB. Significado clínico del síndrome coronario agudo con elevación transitoria del segmento ST. Med Intensiva. 2011;35:267–9.

Copyright © 2011. Elsevier España, S.L. and SEMICYUC
Download PDF
Idiomas
Medicina Intensiva (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?