Suggestions
Idioma
Guide for authors
Searcher
Journal Information
Vol. 50. Issue 1.
(January 2026)
Cite
Cite
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
2204
Vol. 50. Issue 1.
(January 2026)
Update on intensive care medicine: Pediatric intensive care
Full text access

Prolonged mechanical ventilation and tracheostomised Paediatric

Ventilación mecánica prolongada y paciente traqueostomizado en cuidados intensivos pediátricos
Visits
2204
Rafael González Cortésa, Martí Pons Òdenab,c,d, Mirella Gabolie,f,g, María Angeles García-Teresah,i,
Corresponding author
angelesgarciateresa@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
a Servicio de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Departamento de Salud Pública y Materno Infantil. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Primary Care Interventions to Prevent Maternal and Child Chronic Diseases of Perinatal and Development Origin Network (RICORS) RD21/0012/0025, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
b Grupo de Disfunción Inmunológica y Respiratoria, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
c Unidad Funcional, Programa de Ventilación Domiciliaria Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
d Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos e Intermedios, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
e Grupo de Alteraciones Congénitas de Inmunidad, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBiS/Universidad de Sevilla/CSIC Campus Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
f Unidad Funcional, Programa de Ventilación Domiciliaria Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
g Unidad de Neumología Pediátrica y Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
h Servicio de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos, Unidad de Ventilación Mecánica Domiciliaria, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
i Grupo de Enfermedades Oncohematológicas, Instituto de Investigación del Hospital de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
Ver más
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
fig0005
Tables (5)
Table 1. Indications for prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) by disease, pathophysiological mechanisms involved (I), and expected benefits of PMV.
Tables
Table 2. Home use IMV and NIV ventilators.
Tables
Table 3. Advantages and disadvantages of TC versus endotracheal intubation in children.
Tables
Table 4. Complications of tracheostomy described in the literature.
Tables
Table 5. Material for home mechanical ventilation.50
Tables
Abstract

Prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) in paediatric intensive care (PICU) is increasing due to health advances and ethical criteria favouring the survival of chronically ill children. These patients require resources, generate high family demand and present a high risk of complications and mortality. Among the most frequent underlying pathologies are chronic respiratory diseases, neuromuscular diseases, prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and heart disease, with oncological pathology emerging in recent years.

In PICU, PMV is mainly performed by invasive MV with an endotracheal or tracheostomy tube (TC), with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) being less frequent. Successful weaning from MV requires strategies aimed at identifying and correcting factors that alter the balance between respiratory system load and respiratory work capacity. Both TC and NIV can facilitate ventilatory weaning or be solutions for long-term ventilation. There is no defined optimal time to perform TC in children; this decision should be individualised on a risk-benefit basis. TC tends to be delayed in children much longer than in adults. One-piece cannulae are used in paediatrics; in addition, if there is clinical stability and the possibility of connection to a home ventilator, uncuffed cannulae should be prioritised because of their better tolerance and safety. Home ventilation allows for a return to the home environment, improving quality of life and favouring neurodevelopment. However, institutional support can be insufficient to cope with the high responsibility and burden assumed by families.

Keywords:
Prolonged mechanical ventilation
Paediatric intensive care
Tracheostomy in children
Chronic respiratory failure
Resumen

La ventilación mecánica prolongada (VMP) en las unidades de cuidados intensivos pediátricos (UCIP) está aumentando debido a los avances sanitarios y a criterios éticos que favorecen la supervivencia de niños con enfermedades crónicas. Estos pacientes utilizan numerosos recursos sanitarios, generan alta demanda familiar y presentan riesgo elevado de complicaciones y mortalidad. Entre las patologías de base más frecuentes están las enfermedades respiratorias crónicas, neuromusculares, prematuridad, displasia broncopulmonar o cardiopatías, emergiendo en los últimos años la patología oncológica.

En UCIP, la VMP se realiza principalmente mediante ventilación mecánica invasiva (VMI) con tubo endotraqueal o traqueostomía (TQ), siendo menos frecuente la ventilación no invasiva (VNI). La retirada exitosa de la ventilación requiere estrategias encaminadas a identificar y corregir factores que alteran el equilibrio entre la carga del sistema respiratorio y la capacidad de trabajo respiratorio. Tanto la TQ como la VNI pueden facilitar el destete ventilatorio o ser soluciones para ventilación a largo plazo.

No existe un momento óptimo definido para realizar una TQ en niños; esta decisión debe ser individualizada valorando riesgo-beneficio de cada alternativa. En niños la TQ suele demorarse mucho más que en adultos. En pediatría se utilizan cánulas de una sola pieza; además, si existe estabilidad clínica y posibilidad de conexión a respirador domiciliario, se deben priorizar las cánulas sin balón, por su mejor tolerancia y seguridad.

La ventilación domiciliaria permite el retorno al entorno familiar, mejorando la calidad de vida y favoreciendo el neurodesarrollo. Sin embargo, la ayuda institucional puede ser insuficiente para afrontar la alta responsabilidad y carga asumidas por las familias.

Palabras clave:
Ventilación mecánica prolongada
Cuidados intensivos pediátricos
Traqueostomía en niños
Insuficiencia respiratoria crónica
Full Text
Introduction/general aspects

Prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) in adults is defined as needing ≥21 consecutive days of invasive (INV) or noninvasive (NIV) mechanical ventilation (MV) for ≥6 h/day with a maximum of 48 h without MV.1 In the case of children, there is no consensus, but ≥14 days or ≥21 days have been proposed depending on the authors.2–4 Long-term MV, on the other hand, is defined as MV maintained for more than three months, including home MV.5

In recent decades, PMV in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) has increased due to scientific and technological advances and changes in ethical and social criteria affecting the chronically ill population, which is growing in number and survival.6–8 A recent prospective study conducted in 158 PICUs included 14,595 patients from 28 countries, showing a prevalence of PMV of 18.3% in children and adolescents admitted to the PICU,9 which is more than double the figures reported by previous single-center, retrospective studies.10 These patients consume numerous healthcare resources and are at high risk of complications (mainly pneumonia) and mortality.7,9 Reported mortality rates are highly variable (18.2–30%, depending on the series) and are influenced by follow-up time, severity, and regional considerations, such as the resources allocated to long-term MV or the ethical criteria applied in decision-making.6,9 Likewise, the emotional and logistical impact of PMV on families is enormous. Typically, one parent, usually the mother, assumes the role of primary caregiver.11 The present article describes the characteristics of these patients, technical aspects related to MV and tracheostomy (TC), weaning strategies, transition to home, and treatment outcomes. The content focuses on the PICU setting and does not address elective PMV initiated outside the PICU.

Subsidiary patients

Children and adolescents with PMV constitute a very heterogeneous group of patients. From a pathophysiological perspective, such cases can be grouped into three clinical syndromes: increased respiratory load, respiratory pump failure, and failure of neurological control of breathing.12 Patients commonly experience several pathophysiological mechanisms over the course of the disorder. Thus, neuromuscular diseases progress from an initial stage of being unable to cope with the increased respiratory load due to infection to a second stage characterized by progressive respiratory pump failure (with alveolar hypoventilation). In the case of degenerative diseases of the central nervous system (CNS), this progresses to a third stage involving failure of the neurological control of breathing. In other disorders, such as severe chronic lung disease secondary to prematurity, oncohematological disease, and heart diseases, increased respiratory load is the primary mechanism. Finally, the growing group of genetic or chromosomal disorders may combine several injury mechanisms13–19 (Table 1). Although the data show regional differences, the diseases most frequently associated with the need for PMV in the PICU are congenital heart diseases, followed by bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neuromuscular disorders. Oncohematological diseases account for approximately 10% of all cases.9

Table 1.

Indications for prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) by disease, pathophysiological mechanisms involved (I), and expected benefits of PMV.

Diseases  Effects of PMV 
Congenital and acquired heart disease (increased respiratory load)
Cardiopathywith altered pulmonary blood flow.  Reduce respiratory work and O2 consumption. Maintain FRC close to normal. Improved oxygenation. Decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance. 
Cardiomyopathywith ventricular dysfunction.  Open and stabilize alveoli collapsed by lung edema. Reduce respiratory work and O2 consumption. Prevent pulmonary fluid overload. 
Diseases of the airway and lung parenchyma (increased respiratory load)
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia associated with prematurity.  Avoid airway collapse on exhalation. Reduce respiratory work. Maintain FRC close to normal. 
Obstructive or restrictive lung disease: cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, pulmonary hypoplasia, sequelae of ARDS.  Reduce respiratory work. 
Central airway diseases. Laryngo-tracheomalacia.  Avoid airway collapse. Reduce respiratory work. 
Obstruction(anatomical or functional) of the upper airway: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); hypoventilation-obesity syndrome. Down syndrome; craniofacial malformations (Pierre Robin sequence, Goldenhar); deposition diseases.  Maintain patent airway. 
Thoracic disorders (increased respiratory load)
Scoliosis and other abnormal curvatures of the spine.  Maintain FRC close to normal. 
Congenital bone dysplasia with involvement of ribs and/or vertebras. Sternal malformations.  Stabilize the airways. Maintain FRC close to normal. 
Neuromuscular diseases (respiratory pump failure)
Acquired, reversible: polymyositis; myasthenic crises; botulism; respiratory infection or intercurrent process in neuromuscular disease.  Sustain or replace activity of the respiratory muscles, while the causative disease is resolved. 
Congenital or degenerative: spinal muscular atrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, myopathy, muscular dystrophy, collagenosis, diaphragm disease, polyneuropathy.  Substitute respiratory muscle activity. Maintain FRC close to normal. 
Diseases of the central nervous system (failure of central respiration control)
Congenital central hypoventilation syndrome. ROHHAD.  Substitute respiratory control. 
Central hypoventilation secondary to metabolic disease, intoxications, structural lesions of the CNS (Arnold-Chiari malformation; syringomyelia; other bulbar lesions; foramen magnum stenosis; Becker's cyst; tumors). Degenerative diseases.  Substitute respiratory control. 
Spinal cord injuries(acquired or congenital).  Substitute respiratory muscle activity. Maintain FRC close to normal. 
Peripheral nerve lesions, congenital or acquired
Vocal cord paralysis(increased respiratory load).  Reduce respiratory work. 
Paralysis of the phrenic nerve (respiratory pump failure).  Substitute activity of the diaphragmatic musculature. Maintain FRC close to normal. 
Guillain-Barré syndrome (respiratory pump failure).  Substitute respiratory muscle activity while nerve conduction and muscle activity is restored. 
Oncohematological diseases
According to initial tumor symptomatology. According to infectious and non-infectious complications (due to chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, etc.) during treatment. According to long-term sequelae: CNS lesions, polyneuropathy, myopathy, airway alterations, bronchiolitis obliterans, pulmonary fibrosis.  Maintain patent airway. Ensure central control of breathing. Sustain or replace activity of the respiratory muscles. Reduce respiratory work. 
Palliative care patients  Maintain comfort and control dyspnea. 

FRC: functional residual capacity; ROHHAD: rapid-onset obesity with hypothalamic dysfunction, hypoventilation, and autonomic dysregulation; ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; CNS: central nervous system.

Technical aspectsInvasive mechanical ventilation

Although PMV in the PICU is often initiated using conventional ventilators, it is common to transition to home ventilators.20 In pediatrics, these devices can generally be used for patients with a body weight of at least 5 kg, though some are designed for patients weighing less (Table 2). Ventilator operation varies depending on the circuit used. While there is significant variability between centers, the most common systems are the simple circuit with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) valve and the simple circuit with an exhalation port. Like those in the PICU, these ventilators offer volume and pressure modes, with assist/control, synchronized, and support modes. There are also volume-assured support modes, though they are not commonly used due to their irregular operation in the presence of leaks.21

Table 2.

Home use IMV and NIV ventilators.

Model  IMV/NIV  Minimum patient weight  Programs available  Mode pipette  Triggers  Minimum inspiratory time  Flow l/min  Device weight (kg)  Internal/external battery 
ASTRAL 150  Yes/Yes  5 kg  Yes  Vsync, Ti Control  0.2 s  Up to 250  3.2  8/16 h 
EO-150 EOVE  Yes/Yes  3.5 kg  Yes  Neonatal  0.3 s  1.8  5/13 h 
LUISA  Yes/Yes  3.5 kg  No  Adaptive  0.2 s  Up to 220  2.8  6/18 h 
LUMIS 150  No/Yes  ↓  Yes  Flow  0.3 s  Up to 200  1.25  No/8 h 
MONNAL T-50  Yes/Yes  5.3 kg  No  Flow  5.3  4/18 h 
STELLAR  No/Yes  13 kg  No  Flow  0.3 s  Up to 250  2,1  2/8 h 
TRILOGY EVO  Yes/Yes  3.5 kg  No  Auto-track sensitive flow  0.3 s  Up to 200  -/15 h 
VIVO 45 LS  Yes/Yes  5 kg  No  Flow and pressure  0.3 s  Up to 220  2.4  2/18 h 
VIVO 3.4  Yes/Yes  5 kg  No  Flow  1.8  3/- 

IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation; NIV: non-invasive ventilation.

Non-invasive ventilation

NIV can also be provided with hospital or home ventilators. Some are designed only for children weighing more than 13 kg. The most common modes are pressure modes, with the S/T [PC-IMV(2)s,s] mode being the most widespread. This pressure support mode is combined with a rescue respiratory frequency (RF). The standard nomenclature for these parameters is peak inspiratory pressure (IPAP) and expiratory pressure (EPAP). However, in some ventilators, pressure support is programmed as IPAP = EPAP + PS.22 Once again, the volume-assured modes (adaptive control scheme) are not commonly used, due to their irregular operation in the presence of leaks. A wide variety of interfaces are currently available, especially for patients over 4 years of age.23

High-flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannulas

Initially used in hospitals, high-flow oxygen (HFO) devices are finding new applications in noninvasive ventilation (NIV), including at-home use. The most recent NIV ventilator models incorporate HFO as an option.24

Weaning strategies

Due to the complications associated with the use of the different invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation modalities, withdrawal from ventilation should be considered as soon as it becomes possible.25 Despite the existence of guidelines for weaning patients from mechanical ventilation,26 their effective application remains limited.27

Current recommendations include conducting periodic systematized evaluations seeking to determine if a patient is potentially ready for extubation.26 Extubation adequacy testing forms part of these evaluations.28,29 In general, these evaluations include:

  • Variables related to the underlying disease that require the initiation of MV.

  • Physiological variables aimed at assessing respiratory function.

  • Variables related to ventilator parameters.

  • Other patient-related variables, such as neurological status, sedation level, muscle function, and hemodynamic status. The patient must have an adequate level of sedation, an effective cough, and adequate secretions management in order to be considered suitable for extubation.26,30 Unfortunately, the best tools for identifying these situations have not been clearly defined. One method of assessing muscle strength is to determine peak inspiratory pressure (PImax) using a manometer connected to the endotracheal tube while temporarily occluding the tube. This method can be used to identify the presence of adequate muscle capacity. Values of PImax higher than −30 to −50 cmH2O have been proposed as predictors of weaning success, depending on age.26,31,32

Any protocol or systematic evaluation aimed at facilitating weaning from mechanical ventilation should consider the existence of patients at high risk of extubation failure.30 Early determination of the patient's suitability for extubation may result in a better prognosis. In recent years, the potential usefulness of automated assessment tools has been suggested.

Spontaneous breathing trials are widely used in the PICU setting.28,29 These trials are used to evaluate patient suitability for extubation by assessing respiratory effort under conditions similar to those which the patient would experience upon extubation. This evaluation aims to reduce the degree of respiratory support. These trials temporarily establish minimum ventilatory parameters to assess respiratory function and work.26 However, there are conflicting results regarding the use of minimal pressure support in pediatrics to overcome endotracheal tube resistance and whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adequately predicts respiratory effort after extubation.26,33,34 There is also a lack of consensus on the most appropriate duration of these trials.35–37 Most authors emphasize the need for more demanding and prolonged spontaneous breathing trials in patients at higher risk for extubation failure.23,26

Post-extubation upper airway obstruction is one of the most common causes of extubation failure in pediatric patients, accounting for up to 50% of cases.30 For this reason, prevention and risk assessment are important. Deflating the cuff during air leak testing could identify patients at higher risk, although no criteria have been defined for its use.26 The possible use of laryngeal ultrasound has also been proposed.32 There is evidence that corticosteroids (usually dexamethasone) are effective in preventing inflammatory upper airway obstruction. Administering high doses (>0.5 mg/kg/dose) at least 6 h before extubation could be associated with better results.26,38 Nevertheless, recommendations state that once a patient is deemed suitable for extubation, extubation should not be delayed to initiate corticosteroid treatment.26

Over the past decade, the use of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) has been proposed as a method to facilitate weaning from invasive and noninvasive ventilatory support. Several studies have been conducted in children, particularly neonates,39 but also in older patients.40,41 Although NAVA is not widely available and is costly, it has been shown to reduce asynchronies, potentially making it especially useful in patients in whom asynchronies are a significant factor.41

TC may facilitate weaning from PMV by enabling decreased sedoanalgesia and better adaptation. Some studies have reported shorter MV and admission times in pediatric patients with early TC.42 In the international study published by Kawaguchi et al., up to 29.8% of patients were tracheostomized before 14 days of MV, with a median time of 26 days.9 Conversely, TC may facilitate discharge from the PICU to less complex care settings or to home.

Another critical factor in successfully withdrawing from PMV is the post-extubation use of NIV. Current recommendations suggest the systematic use of CPAP or BiPAP for patients at risk of extubation failure.26 HFO appears to be less effective in this context,43 and its use is therefore discouraged, especially in children under one year of age.26 It is also recommended that support be escalated early for patients who are extubated to conventional oxygen therapy and show signs of respiratory distress.26

The child with a tracheostomy

TC is a technique that is commonly used in children, including infants under one year of age. The TC cannula provides a stable artificial airway, resolving anatomical or functional airway obstruction (as occurs in severe tracheomalacia). It also allows for PMV and secretions management.44

When to perform tracheostomy

An adult patient with a foreseeable MV period of more than two weeks is considered to require TC, and some authors perform it early (before 7 days).45,46 There is no evidence to determine the optimal timing of TC in children. In routine clinical practice, however, it is delayed much longer.9 Several pediatric-specific factors influence this delay: (a) the surgical technique, since TC in children is performed in the operating room, not percutaneously at the bedside; (b) decannulation is considered in the long term; and (c) children with TC remain in the PICU for long periods of time.

The indication must be individualized, taking into account the patient’s age, underlying disease, clinical evolution, weaning expectations, and the risk-benefit ratio of the alternatives (intubation, NIV, surgery) (Table 3). In any case, prompt identification of candidates for early TC is required to facilitate their early discharge home and promote their optimal neurodevelopment.42,47,48

Table 3.

Advantages and disadvantages of TC versus endotracheal intubation in children.

  Tracheostomy  Intubation 
Advantages  - Easy to place and remove, when the stoma has matured - Patient comfort - Allows little or no sedation - Facilitates rehabilitation - Allows speech and swallowing - Enables discharge from the PICU - Facilitates neurocognitive development  - No need for surgery - Absence of complications of TC 
Disadvantages  - Requires surgical intervention in operating room- Surgical complications, in the immediate postoperative period and thereafter - Possible increase in respiratory infections - The decannulation process is usually lengthy  - Nose or mouth lesions - Risk of subglottic stenosis - Always requires a trained physician for insertion - Requires admission to the PICU 

TC: tracheostomy; PICU: Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Source: Reproduced with the permission of García Teresa and Leoz.50
Types of tracheostomy tubes

The type and size of the cannula should be personalized based on the patient's age, reason for tracheostomy (TC), tracheal anatomy, and use of mechanical ventilation or a speaking valve (Fig. 1). In general, one-piece cannulas without a balloon or cuff49 are used in pediatrics, usually made of plastic or silicone (exceptionally, silver). The size corresponds to the internal diameter (ID). Cannulas that occupy no more than two-thirds of the tracheal lumen are recommended to prevent lesions and enable phonatory translaryngeal flow. A small cannula is preferable if it achieves the intended purpose (i.e., a patent airway and adequate ventilation). The distal end of the cannula should be positioned concentrically and collinearly with the trachea; otherwise, there is a risk of esophageal obstruction, sudden obstruction by the tracheal wall, wall erosion, innominate artery damage, or tracheoesophageal fistula.49,50

Figure 1.

Different types of tracheostomy tubes.50 Cannulas with a cuff: (A) Air and straight flange; (B) Foam and V-shaped flange; (C) Saline solution, tight to shaft (TTS), when deflated, it remains totally attached to the cannula without restricting flow. (D) Two-piece cannula (external and internal) with cuff and straight flange, available from an internal diameter of 6. (E) Customized cannula, without cuff, straight flange, and with flexible extension at the proximal end. (F) The flexible extension allows connection of the ventilator circuits away from the stoma. This is especially useful when access to the neck is difficult, such as with infants, small children, or spinal cord injury patients with immobilizing halo braces. It can also prevent airflow from entering through the fresh sutures of the stoma if the patient is disconnected. (G) Cuff-less cannula of adjustable length, with flexible internal extension and external extension. (H) Fenestrated cannula. Fenestrated cannulas are rarely used in children because they increase resistance to flow (since they have 2 pieces) and favor the formation of granulomas at the fenestration. Additionally, small sizes are not manufactured. (I) Cannula with cuff and subglottic suction channel to minimize microaspiration, available for adults.

Source: Reproduced with the permission of García Teresa and Leoz.50

Cannulas without a cuff or with a deflated cuff are typically used to enable phonation and facilitate swallowing. The absence of a cuff makes tidal volume alarms unnecessary, but low minute volume alarms (less than 1 l/min) can remain. Cuff-equipped cannulas are indicated for the following: a) to optimize ventilation in cases of severe respiratory disease; b) during the first 5–7 days postoperatively, to prevent complications from air entering through the recent sutures if MV is used; and c) to prevent chronic translaryngeal aspiration. This latter indication is currently being questioned.51

Some companies allow cannulas to be customized (made longer or with a special curvature) for patients with special needs, such as children with distal tracheomalacia that is not covered by the standard length. Customizing the cannulas ensures optimal ventilation and comfort.

Postoperative care (first week)

A newly tracheostomized child should be closely monitored until the wound heals properly and the cannula is changed for the first time. The smaller the cannula, the greater the control required to ensure patency of the cannula and prevent accidental exit. Adequate stoma formation takes 4–7 days.52 It is advisable to display the day of surgery and the cannula type at the bedside.

A chest X-ray should be performed upon arrival from the operating room to confirm correct positioning of the cannula and rule out immediate complications, such as pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum. Adequate humidification should be provided to thin secretions and frequently aspirate them, thus avoiding blood clots. Consider sedation if the child might manipulate the cannula inadequately, in addition to mandatory analgesia. Do not change the fastening straps for at least 48 h to avoid accidental decannulation. Recent studies recommend using antimicrobial dressings during the first week to prevent infection and ulcers. These dressings contain polyurethane foam, which absorbs exudate and promotes healing, as well as an antibacterial silver contact layer. The first cannula change should be performed in the presence of the surgeon.50,52

Complications and accidents52–55

TC complications can occur during surgery or during the first postoperative week (immediate), or at a later point (late) (Table 4). Some of these complications can cause sudden ventilatory failure, which can result in death or permanent neurological damage. Changing the cannula in a freshly placed TC within the first five postoperative days may create a false pathway, causing the cannula to become malpositioned in the subcutaneous layers and preventing ventilation. Tension pneumothorax can cause cardiorespiratory collapse. Other serious, frequent complications include obstruction of the cannula by secretions, especially in cannulas below number 4, and accidental decannulation. These complications may go unnoticed and may not allow for re-cannulation or deobstruction. Inadvertent disconnection of the ventilator poses another threat to patient safety. Significant effort must be made to prevent and identify these serious complications early through specific care and action protocols involving multidisciplinary teamwork and family caregivers. Children with TCs should always have an emergency kit with the necessary materials (e.g., cannulas, aspiration systems, and scissors) to resolve these sudden, threatening events.56

Table 4.

Complications of tracheostomy described in the literature.

Intraoperative complications - Ectopic air (emphysema, pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax) - Tracheal injury - Recurrent nerve injury - Tracheoesophageal fistula - Bleeding - Cannula malpositioning - Hypoventilation - Death 
Early complications (first 7 postoperative days) - Surgical wound problems: ulcers, dehiscence, infection, etc. - Neck skin erosion - Cannula obstruction - Accidental exit of the cannula - Impossibility to re-cannulate - Misplacement - Hypoventilation - Ectopic air (emphysema, pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax) - Bleeding - Mediastinitis - Respiratory arrest - Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy - Death 
Late complications (after first 7 postoperative days) - Stoma infection - Bronchopulmonary infection - Cannula obstruction - Accidental exit of the cannula - Stoma granuloma - Intratracheal granuloma - Tracheal stenosis - Tracheomalacia - Tracheo-arterial fistula (innominate artery) - Cannula mechanical problems (breakage, deformity) - Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy - Death 
Complications after decannulation - Permanent tracheocutaneous fistula - Depressed scar - Decannulation failure - Ectopic air (emphysema, pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax) 
Source: Reproduced with the permission of García Teresa and Leoz.50
Side effects of tracheostomy

Although the TC cannula does not seem to worsen quality of life per se, it may hinder basic functions such as the control of secretions, swallowing, and speech.57,58

Children with tracheostomies may not handle secretions properly, but it is unclear whether TC increases them. A recent study showed that drooling and increased tracheal secretions do not lead to an increased tendency toward hospital admission due to respiratory decompensation.59 Anticholinergic treatments, botulinum toxin injections into the salivary glands, and scopolamine patches may decrease saliva production when increased. However, these measures are not recommended for children without excessive saliva production due to an increased risk of obstructive dried secretion plugs. Thermal humidification is superior to the heat and moisture exchanger (HME) in terms of comfort and control of secretions60.

Tracheostomized children are frequently colonized by potentially pathogenic bacteria (PPB), since the cannula eliminates the protection, filtration, humidification, and warming of air provided naturally by the nasal cavity. In addition, the cannula may cause a local inflammatory reaction that further increases the risk of infection. Some studies indicate that nebulized antibiotic therapy in the case of persistent bacterial colonization could reduce the bacterial load, and the number and duration of hospitalizations.61 Pulmonary infection in a child with TC and PMV should be treated as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).61 Manual and mechanical physiotherapy techniques are essential to increase cough and the clearance of secretions. The mechanical assist to cough can be applied over the cannula with and without a cuff, and is more effective than the aspiration of secretions.62

Children with TC and MV may experience dysphagia, because the cannula restricts laryngeal swallowing. This problem worsens when the cuff is inflated and when there is oropharyngeal hyposensitivity. Contrary to popular belief, recent studies have shown an increased risk of aspirating accumulated subglottic secretions when the cuff is inflated due to body movements, cannula manipulation, and difficulty with laryngeal elevation during swallowing. If possible, swallowing ability should be periodically assessed. Initially, a screening test with dye (the Evans test), which can be completed by videofluoroscopy or fibroendoscopy, can be used.51

Speech ability is affected by the decreased expiratory flow through the vocal cords. This can be corrected with a one-way speaking valve connected to the cannula, which can be used with and without MV, but only if the cuff is deflated, the upper airway is patent, the child is alert and receptive, and is free of respiratory infection. This can be done 48 h after surgery.63 Occasionally, the subglottic pressure created by the restriction of expiratory flow complicates the use of the speaking valve. This can be solved by creating a small, intentional lateral pressure-relieving perforation64 or by using speaking valves that allow a certain degree of exhalation to be regulated.

Non-respiratory aspects: nutrition, rehabilitation, ethics, and family

Several studies have demonstrated the importance of ensuring adequate nutrition for pediatric patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.65–68 Recommendations for the non-respiratory management of pediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)69 have recently been published. These recommendations include the early introduction of enteral nutrition (EN) before 72 h and the use of targeted nutritional protocols to ensure caloric intake that covers basal needs, facilitates recovery, and maintains growth. For these patients, it is advised that at least 1.5 g/kg/day of protein be provided. The administration route may range from a nasogastric tube to a transpyloric tube. Over the long term, a gastrostomy may be necessary, with or without antireflux surgery. In some patients, TC allows for oral intake.

Regarding rehabilitation strategies, these guidelines recommend maintaining circadian patterns of activity and rest, as well as setting activity and mobilization goals. Rehabilitation should be personalized and coordinated by multidisciplinary teams that assess the initial condition, establish goals, and determine the optimal time to start rehabilitation.69 Respiratory physiotherapy techniques, such as increased expiratory flow, manual hyperinflation, and vibrations, have proven useful in managing secretions, which is particularly important for neuromuscular patients dependent on mechanical ventilation.70 Speech therapists play a fundamental role in phonatory and dysphagia rehabilitation.

In recent years, the significant role of families in caring for pediatric patients with PMV has become evident.71–73 Beyond their importance in providing daily care during hospital admission and at home, the most recent recommendations advocate for the direct involvement of parents in decision-making related to the use of PMV in children.74,75 The care team must combine its experience and knowledge with an understanding of the patients' and their families' values, beliefs, and expectations. Open, empathetic, and unbiased communication is essential between all parties involved in the process. Rather than making decisions in a single encounter, they should be approached in a thoughtful manner over time. A critical issue is assessing the family's understanding of the disease, the therapeutic options, and the implications of caring for a child subjected to prolonged ventilation.

Transition to home

The transition to home is very different for children who are on life-sustaining mechanical ventilation (PMV), either tracheostomized or receiving NIV for more than 16 h per day, compared to those who receive elective NIV, usually at night.

The PICU should incorporate strategies that have already proven effective in the management of preterm infants, such as NAVA NIV or the kangaroo care method.76 Different interfaces can be selected for patients with NIV, depending on age, weight, and severity.23

In general, patients who cannot tolerate short resting periods due to bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis, experience airway collapse with rapid deterioration associated with tracheomalacia, or have frequent sudden episodes of cyanosis due to severe breath-holding spells associated with Ondine's disease should not receive NIV support. Instead, they should undergo tracheostomy immediately to ensure their safety.77

Before scheduling the transition home, it is essential to stabilize the patient adequately on the hospital ventilator. Transitioning to a home ventilator can be challenging for patients weighing less than 6 kg, especially infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. This requires careful selection of the ventilator and precise adjustment of its settings.78 Currently, only a few home ventilators can support patients weighing less than 5 kg.

The standards for training and assessing family caregiver competency vary among institutions. Families and their medical teams should agree on minimum safety preparations, materials, and the number of trained individuals responsible for care at home (Table 5). For IMV, it is recommended that at least two family caregivers receive full training in all aspects of care before the patient is discharged. In addition to daily hands-on training with the patient, simulation sessions can improve management of situations such as cannula obstruction or aspiration.77

Table 5.

Material for home mechanical ventilation.50

- Specific home MV ventilator (2 devices in case of MV > 16 h or life support therapy). 
- External battery for respirator. 
- Complete ventilator circuits (1): corrugated tubes, connecting parts, water traps, Y-tubes. 
- Thermal humidifier or heat-humidity exchanger (nose humidifiers) (2). 
- Portable secretions aspirator. 
- Pulse oximeter. 
- Interfaces with straps (various models). 
- Tracheostomy tubes of the corresponding number and also smaller (3). 
- Aspiration tubes (4). 
- Manual resuscitation bag and full face mask. 
- Endotracheal tube of the corresponding number and also smaller. 
- Stethoscope. 
- Speaking valve 
- Cannula fastening strap (5). 
- Disinfectant for cannulas, chlorhexidine. 
- Sterile gauze, dressings, gloves, water-alcohol gel. 
- Physiological saline solution, sterile water, syringes. 
- Non-vaseline lubricant. 
Depending on the patient 
- Oxygen source, oximeter (if required), O2 extension sets, nasal cannulas, masks. 
- Medication nebulizer. 
- Feeding pump, silicone nasogastric tube (6), gastrostomy connection. 
- Syringes 50 and 10 ml. 
- Respiratory rehabilitation devices. 
- Apnea monitor. 
- Wheelchair adapted for ventilator and external battery. 
(1): Cleaning with enzymatic soap solution and antiseptic once a week; the patient should have at least circuits at home. 
(2): It can last up to 3 days or more. 
(3): Change as needed or on a scheduled basis, depending on the material and the patient. They are reusable. 
(4): They can be reused after antiseptic cleaning. 
(5): Change once a day. 
(6): They can be maintained for up to 6 months. 
The need for consumables varies from patient to patient depending on the clinical situation. 
The patient should receive at least a one-month supply of material. 
Source: Reproduced with the permission of García Teresa and Leoz.50
Results: benefits, adverse effects, complications, mortality

The long-term therapeutic objectives of PMV are to prolong life, improve quality of life, and prevent the deterioration of lung function or respiratory exacerbations. PMV is currently a realistic alternative to death due to respiratory failure for many children with chronic respiratory disease, and the most obvious benefit of this technique is increased life expectancy.6,79 Some patients, especially those diagnosed with chronic lung or airway disease, can be weaned off of PMV.55,80 Additionally, elective PMV reduces respiratory infections, complications due to secretions, decompensation episodes, and the number and duration of hospital admissions.15,22

The mortality rate is higher for children with PMV than for healthy children. However, it is not possible to determine if this increase is due to the progression of the underlying disease, chronic respiratory failure that cannot be compensated for by respiratory support, inadequate therapeutic efforts in situations of worsening, or complications intrinsically related to PMV.4,6,9,80,81 Several studies have reported an increased risk of fatal accidents in PMV patients due to TC, resulting from accidental decannulation or cannula obstruction.53–55,81 PMV is associated with increased mortality during admission to the PICU due to the impossibility of extubation, accidental extubation with the impossibility of reintubation, infections, and other healthcare-related complications.79,81

Infectious complications are primarily associated with IMV. Tracheobronchitis is the most common complication, and VAP is the most serious complication.79 IMV is associated with lung and airway injuries, particularly at the laryngeal and tracheal levels. Using a clamped endotracheal tube with pressure above 20−25 mmHg can result in tracheal mucosal injury and lead to symptomatic subglottic stenosis.79 Additionally, using an endotracheal tube with inadequate sedation can result in laryngeal injury. The most significant pulmonary complication is ventilation-induced lung injury (VILI). It is associated with elevated tidal volume, driving pressure, flow, and respiratory rate. To a lesser extent, VILI is related to increased PEEP, resistance, and elastance.79 Sedatives and muscle relaxants can produce complications such as withdrawal syndrome, delirium, myopathy, neuropathy, and diaphragmatic dysfunction. TC can significantly reduce the need for these drugs.45

The most common complications associated with PMV and NIV include pressure ulcers caused by interfaces, conjunctival irritation due to uncontrolled leaks, and facial deformities caused by continuous pressure from straps and masks.23,82

PMV can affect feeding methods, making an enteral tube or gastrostomy obligatory for intubated patients.55,79

Children with PMV require costly healthcare resources7 (technology and specialized personnel) and a great deal of family and social support. The impact on the mental health and quality of life of family members (parents and siblings) is negative due to the increased care burden. For the same condition and severity, patients with PMV perceive a better quality of life than patients without it. However, parents tend to have a poorer impression of their child’s quality of life than the patient does.11

In conclusion, PMV in the PICU is a growing technique with specific characteristics that differ from conventional mechanical ventilation, both materially and technically. Personnel involved in managing pediatric patients with PMV must have specific knowledge to use this technique effectively.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Design, preparation, and revision of the manuscript: all authors. Coordination: María Ángeles García Teresa.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

AI has not been used.

Financial support

The authors state that the present study has received no funding.

Declaration of competing interest

Rafael Gónzalez Cortés, Mirella Gaboli, and María Angeles García Teresa declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Martí Pons Ódena declares the following conflicts of interest: receipt of equipment and materials from Phillips Respironics, ResMed, Lowestein, Breas, and conference fees from Lowestein.

References
[1]
N.R. MacIntyre, S.K. Epstein, S. Carson, D. Scheinhorn, K. Christopher, S. Muldoon.
Management of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation.
Chest., 128 (2005), pp. 3937-3954
[2]
M. Sauthier, L. Rose, P. Jouvet.
Pediatric prolonged mechanical ventilation: considerations for definitional criteria.
Respir Care, 61 (2016), pp. 1-17
[3]
J. Colleti, R. Teixeira Azevedo, F. Rezende de Oliveira Caino, O. Ribeiro de Araujo.
Prolonged mechanical ventilation in children: review of the definition.
Pediatr Crit Care Med., 22 (2021), pp. e588-e593
[4]
R. Chen, Y. Liu, H. Dang.
Definition, risk factors, and outcome analysis of prolonged mechanical ventilation in children.
Pediatr Pulmonol., 59 (2024), pp. 2507-2516
[5]
E. Jardine, M. O’Toole, J.Y. Paton, C. Wallis.
Current status of long term ventilation of children in the United Kingdom: questionnaire survey.
BMJ., 318 (1999), pp. 295-299
[6]
Z. Zhang, J. Tao, X. Cai, L. Huang, C. Liu, H. Ren, et al.
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of children with prolonged mechanical ventilation in PICUs in mainland China: a national survey.
Pediatr Pulmonol., 58 (2023), pp. 1401-1410
[7]
H.K. Kanthimathinathan, A. Plunkett, B.R. Scholefield, G.A. Pearson, K.P. Morris.
Trends in long-stay admissions to a UK paediatric intensive care unit.
Arch Dis Child., 105 (2020), pp. 558-562
[8]
J.S. Barajas-Romero, P. Vásquez-Hoyos, R. Pardo, J.C. Jaramillo-Bustamente, R. Grigolli, N. Monteverde-Fernández, et al.
Factors associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation in children with pulmonary failure: Cohort study from the LARed Network registry.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed), 48 (2024), pp. 23-36
[9]
A. Kawaguchi, A. Fernandez, F. Baudin, F. Chuisolo, J.H. Lee, J. Brierley, LongVentKids study group, et al.
Prevalence, management, health-care burden, and 90-day outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation in the paediatric intensive care unit (LongVentKids): an international, prospective, cross-sectional cohort study.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health, 9 (2025), pp. 37-46
[10]
Y. Liu, Q. Wang, J. Hu, F. Zhou, C. Liu, J. Li, et al.
Characteristics and risk factors of children requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation vs. non‐prolonged mechanical ventilation in the PICU: a prospective single‐center study.
[11]
R. González, A. Bustinza, S.N. Fernandez, M. Garcia, S. Rodríguez, M.A. García-Teresa, Spanish Children Home Mechanical Ventilation Multicentric Study Group, et al.
Quality of life in home-ventilated children and their families.
Eur J Pediatr., 176 (2017), pp. 1307-1317
[12]
S. Kwak.
Home mechanical ventilation in children with chronic respiratory failure: a narrative review.
J Yeungnam Med Sci, 40 (2023), pp. 123-135
[13]
A. Kawaguchi, T. Kato.
Prolonged and Long-Term Mechanical Ventilation in Children with Cardiac Diseases.
Prolonged and Long-Term Mechanical Ventilation in Children, 1st ed., pp. 163-176
[14]
A. Fernández, Y.M. López-Fernández.
Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in Children Born with Prematurity.
Prolonged and Long-Term Mechanical Ventilation in Children, 1st ed., pp. 177-196
[15]
M. Gaboli.
Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in Children with Neuromuscular Disease.
Prolonged and Long-Term Mechanical Ventilation in Children, 1st ed., pp. 197-212
[16]
M.A. García-Teresa.
Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in Children with Known Respiratory Disease.
Prolonged and Long-Term Mechanical Ventilation in Children, 1st ed., pp. 213-236
[17]
M.N. James, J. Rains, A. Agulnik.
PMV in Children with Hemato-Oncologic Disease.
Prolonged and Long-Term Mechanical Ventilation in Children, 1st ed., pp. 237-254
[18]
A. Torrent-Vernetta, R. Amin.
Long-term non-invasive ventilation in pediatric neuromuscular diseases: challenges and advances.
BRN Rev., 11 (2025), pp. 63-77
[19]
M. Gaboli, S. Bellón-Alonso, A.J. Aguilar-Fernández.
Oxigenoterapia. Ventilación mecánica domiciliaria.
Tratado de Neumología Pediátrica, 1st ed, pp. 1394-1432
[20]
C. Gregoretti, P. Navalesi, S. Ghannadian, A. Carlucci, P. Pelosi.
Choosing a ventilator for home mechanical ventilation.
Breathe., 9 (2013), pp. 394-409
[21]
M. Pluym, A.W. Kabir, A. Gohar.
The use of volume-assured pressure support noninvasive ventilation in acute and chronic respiratory failure: a practical guide and literature review.
Hosp Pract (1995), 43 (2015), pp. 299-307
[22]
B. Fauroux, F. Abel, A. Amaddeo, E. Bignamini, E. Chan, L. Corel, et al.
ERS statement on paediatric long-term noninvasive respiratory support.
[23]
M.L. Castro-Codesal, D.L. Olmstead, J.E. MacLean.
Mask interfaces for home non-invasive ventilation in infants and children.
Paediatr Respir Rev., 32 (2019), pp. 66-72
[24]
M. Steindor, C.E. Wagner, A. Kavvalou, C. Bock, M. Olivier, F. Stehling.
Indications and outcome of home high‐flow nasal therapy in children, a single‐center experience.
Pediatr Pulm., 57 (2022), pp. 2048-2052
[25]
T. Principi, D.D. Fraser, G.C. Morrison, S.A. Farsi, J.F. Carrelas, E.A. Maurice, et al.
Complications of mechanical ventilation in the pediatric population.
Pediatr Pulmonol, 46 (2011), pp. 452-457
[26]
S. Abu-Sultaneh, N.P. Iyer, A. Fernández, M. Gaies, S. González-Dambrauskas, J.C. Hotz, et al.
Executive summary: international clinical practice guidelines for pediatric ventilator liberation, a Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) network document.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 207 (2022), pp. 17-28
[27]
J.M. Loberger, K. Steffen, R.G. Khemani, A. Nishisaki, S. Abu-Sultaneh.
Implementing the pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines using the most current evidence.
Respir Care, 69 (2024), pp. 869-880
[28]
J.M. Loberger, C.M. Campbell, J. Colleti, S. Borasino, S. Abu-Sultaneh, R.G. Khemani, et al.
Pediatric ventilation liberation: a survey of international practice among 555 pediatric intensivists.
[29]
J.M. Loberger, C.M. Campbell, J. Colleti, S. Borasino, S. Abu-Sultaneh, R.G. Khemani, et al.
Ventilation liberation practices among 380 international PICUs.
[30]
R.G. Khemani, T. Sekayan, J. Hotz, R.C. Flink, G.F. Rafferty, N. Iyer, et al.
Risk factors for pediatric extubation failure.
Crit Care Med, 45 (2017), pp. e798-805
[31]
L. Burton, J. Loberger, M. Baker, P. Prabhakaran, V. Bhargava.
Pre-extubation ultrasound measurement of in situ cuffed endotracheal tube laryngeal air column width difference: single-center pilot study of relationship with post-extubation stridor in subjects younger than 5 years old.
Pediatr Crit Care Med, 25 (2024), pp. 222-230
[32]
J.M. Loberger, R.M. Jones, A.S. Phillips, J.A. Ruhlmann, A.K.M.F. Rahman, N. Ambalavanan, et al.
Pediatric ventilation liberation: evaluating the role of endotracheal secretions in an extubation readiness bundle.
Pediatr Res, 93 (2023), pp. 612-618
[33]
R.G. Khemani, J. Hotz, R. Morzov, R.C. Flink, A. Kamerkar, M. LaFortune, et al.
Pediatric extubation readiness tests should not use pressure support.
Intensiv Care Med, 42 (2016), pp. 1214-1222
[34]
C.R. Vishwa, K. Nallasamy, S.K. Angurana, A. Bansal, M. Jayashree.
Pressure support versus continuous positive airway pressure for predicting successful liberation from invasive ventilation in children: an open label, randomized non-inferiority trial.
Lancet Reg Heal - Southeast Asia, 14 (2023),
[35]
J.M. Loberger, C.R. Watson, E.M. Clingan, S.D. Petrusnek, I.B. Aban, P. Prabhakaran.
Pediatric ventilator liberation: one-hour versus two-hour spontaneous breathing trials in a single center.
Respir Care, 68 (2023), pp. 649-657
[36]
K.E. Knox, J.C. Hotz, C.J.L. Newth, M.C.K. Khoo, R.G. Khemani.
A 30-minute spontaneous breathing trial misses many children who go on to fail a 120-minute spontaneous breathing trial.
[37]
J.M. Krasinkiewicz, M.L. Friedman, J.E. Slaven, R. Lutfi, S. Abu-Sultaneh, A.J. Tori.
Extubation readiness practices and barriers to extubation in pediatric subjects.
[38]
N.P. Iyer, Y.M. López-Fernández, S. González-Dambrauskas, A.K. Baranwal, J.C. Hotz, M. Zhu, et al.
A network meta-analysis of dexamethasone for preventing postextubation upper airway obstruction in children.
Ann Am Thorac Soc, 20 (2023), pp. 118-130
[39]
S. Fang, C. Su, D. Liao, C. Chen, M. Chung, F. Chen, et al.
Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist for rapid weaning in preterm infants.
Pediatr Int, 65 (2023),
[40]
S. Xiao, C. Huang, Y. Cheng, Z. Xia, Y. Li, W. Tang, et al.
Application of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in ventilator weaning of infants ventilator weaning.
Brain Behav, 11 (2021),
[41]
G. Spinazzola, R. Costa, D.D. Luca, G. Chidini, G. Ferrone, M. Piastra, et al.
Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) versus Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) in difficult to wean pediatric ARDS patients: a physiologic crossover study.
BMC Pediatr, 20 (2020), pp. 334
[42]
A. Sachdev, N. Gupta, B.P. Singh, N.D. Choudhari, N. Sharma, S. Gupta, et al.
Indication‐based timing of tracheostomy and its effects on outcome in the pediatric intensive care unit.
Pediatr Pulmonol, 57 (2022), pp. 1684-1692
[43]
P. Ramnarayan, A. Richards-Belle, L. Drikite, M. Saull, I. Orzechowska, R. Darnell, et al.
Effect of high-flow nasal cannula therapy vs continuous positive airway pressure following extubation on liberation from respiratory support in critically ill children.
JAMA, 327 (2022), pp. 1555-1565
[44]
L.L. Veder, K.F.M. Joosten, M.D. Zondag, B. Pullens.
Indications and clinical outcome in pediatric tracheostomy: lessons learned.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol., 151 (2021),
[45]
B.D. Freeman.
Tracheostomy update. When and how.
Crit Care Clin., 33 (2017), pp. 311-322
[46]
B.N. Andriolo, R.B. Andriolo, H. Saconato, ÁN. Atallah, O. Valente.
Early versus late tracheostomy for critically ill patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 1 (2015),
[47]
C.M. Holscher, C.L. Stewart, E.D. Peltz, C.C. Burlew, S.L. Moulton, J.B. Haenel, et al.
Early tracheostomy improves outcomes in severely injured children and adolescents.
J Pediatr Surg., 49 (2014), pp. 590-592
[48]
J.L. Unzueta Roch, M.A. García Teresa, A. García-Salido, R. Vaquero Monje, M.I. Iglesias Bouzas, B. Cabeza Martín, et al.
Pacientes traqueostomizados durante 13 años en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos.
Rev Esp Pediatr, 71S1 (2015), pp. 94
[49]
J.M. Sherman, S. Davis, S. Albamonte-Petrick, R.L. Chatburn, C. Fitton, C. Green, et al.
Care of the Child with a Chronic Tracheostomy. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 161 (2000), pp. 297-308
[50]
M.A. García Teresa, I. Leoz.
Traquestomía y sus cuidados en pacientes pediátricos.
Ventilación Mecánica en recién nacidos, lactantes y niños, 4th ed, pp. 475-488
[51]
E.M. Raynor, D. Wohl.
Tracheostomy-related swallowing issues in children.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am., 57 (2024), pp. 649-655
[52]
J.E. Strychowsky, D. Albert, K. Chan, A. Cheng, S.J. Daniel, A. De Alarcon, et al.
International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group (IPOG) consensus recommendations: routine peri-operative pediatric tracheotomy care.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 86 (2016), pp. 250-255
[53]
S. Ozmen, O.A. Ozmen, O.F. Unal.
Pediatric tracheotomies: a 37-year experience in 282 Children.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 73 (2009), pp. 959-961
[54]
C.D. Sanders, J.S. Guimbellot, M.S. Muhlebach, F.C. Lin, P. Gilligan, C.R. Esther.
Tracheostomy in children: epidemiology and clinical outcomes.
Pediatr Pulmonol., 53 (2018), pp. 1269-1275
[55]
G. Akangire, J.B. Taylor, S. McAnany, J. Noel-MacDonnell, C. Lachica, V. Sampath, et al.
Respiratory, growth, and survival outcomes of infants with tracheostomy and ventilator dependence.
Pediatr Res., 90 (2021), pp. 381-389
[56]
C. Doherty, R. Neal, C. English, J. Cooke, D. Atkinson, L. Bates, et al.
Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of paediatric tracheostomy emergencies.
Anaesthesia, 73 (2018), pp. 1400-1417
[57]
K. Watters.
Management and Strategy of Tracheostomy.
Prolonged and Long-Term Mechanical Ventilation in Children, 1st ed., pp. 289-301
[58]
J.M. Landgraf, I. Vogel, R. Oostenbrink, M.E. van Baar, H. Raat.
Parent-reported health outcomes in infants/toddlers: measurement properties and clinical validity of the ITQOL-SF47.
Qual Life Res., 22 (2013), pp. 635-646
[59]
J. Marcet-Gonzalez, G. Barton, E. Lambert.
Severity of sialorrhea and tracheal secretions in infants and toddlers with a tracheostomy with a focus on quality of life.
[60]
D.G. McNamara, M.I. Asher, B.K. Rubin, A. Stewart, C.A. Byrnes.
Heated humidification improves clinical outcomes, compared to a heat and moisture exchanger in children with tracheostomies.
Respir Care., 59 (2014), pp. 46-53
[61]
H. Pearce, B.J. Talks, S. Powell, M. Brodlie, J. Powell.
A systematic review of antimicrobial therapy in children with tracheostomies.
Pediatr Pulmonol., 59 (2024), pp. 251-259
[62]
M. Chatwin, M. Toussaint, M. Gonçalves, N. Sheers, U. Mellies, J. Gonzales-Bermejo, et al.
Airway clearance techniques in neuromuscular disorders: a state of the art review.
Respir Med., 136 (2018), pp. 98-110
[63]
Z.M. Greene, J. Davenport, S. Fitzgerald, J.D. Russell, P. McNally.
Tracheostomy speaking valve modification in children: a standardized approach leads to widespread use.
Pediatr Pulmonol., 54 (2019), pp. 428-435
[64]
A. Althubaiti, N. Worobetz, J. Inacio, J. Lukens, M. Mousset, A. Onwuka, et al.
Tolerance of one-way in-line speaking valve trials in ventilator dependent children.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol., 157 (2022),
[65]
E.C. Melro, S. Lima AE de, M. Springer AM de, T.H. de Souza, R.J.N. Nogueira.
Protein intake deficiency in critically ill children with respiratory insufficiency: a call to action?.
Clin Nutr ESPEN, 37 (2020), pp. 69-74
[66]
A.A. Sochet, M. Nunez, M.J. Wilsey, J.M. Morrison, S.K. Bessone, T.A. Nakagawa.
Enteral nutrition improves vital signs in children with bronchiolitis on noninvasive ventilation.
Hosp Pediatr, 11 (2021), pp. 135-143
[67]
L.N. Tume, R.D. Eveleens, J. Mayordomo-Colunga, J. López, S.C.A.T. Verbruggen, M. Fricaudet, et al.
Enteral feeding of children on noninvasive respiratory support: a four-center european study.
Pediatr Crit Care Med, 22 (2020), pp. e192-202
[68]
W.K. Jhang, S.J. Park.
Energy expenditure in mechanically ventilated korean children: single-center evaluation of a new estimation equation.
Pediatr Crit Care Med, 21 (2020), pp. e522-9
[69]
S.L. Valentine, S.R. Kudchadkar, S. Ward, B.M. Morrow, V.M. Nadkarni, M.A.Q. Curley, et al.
Nonpulmonary treatments for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: from the second pediatric acute lung injury consensus conference.
Pediatr Crit Care Med, 24 (2023), pp. S45-60
[70]
E. Hawkins, A. Jones.
What is the role of the physiotherapist in paediatric intensive care units? A systematic review of the evidence for respiratory and rehabilitation interventions for mechanically ventilated patients.
Physiotherapy, 101 (2015), pp. 303-309
[71]
L. Miller, M. Richard, K. Krmpotic, A. Kennedy, J. Seabrook, C. Slumkoski, et al.
Parental presence at the bedside of critically ill children in the pediatric intensive care unit: a scoping review.
Eur J Pediatr, 181 (2022), pp. 823-831
[72]
S. Sashisenla, J. Poonam, B. Sunidhi, L. Rakesh, K. Jaykrishnan.
Experiences of the parents of children admitted to PICU.
Indian J Crit Care Med, 28 (2024), pp. 696-701
[73]
Hoogen A. van den, M. Ketelaar.
Parental involvement and empowerment in paediatric critical care: partnership is key!.
Nurs Crit Care, 27 (2022), pp. 294-295
[74]
S. Ray, J. Brierley, A. Bush, J. Fraser, G. Halley, E.J. Harrop, et al.
Towards developing an ethical framework for decision making in long-term ventilation in children.
[75]
G. Peat, S.-A. Delaney, F. Gibson, L.K. Fraser, J. Brierley.
Shared decision-making experiences in child long-term ventilation: a systematic review.
[76]
S. Shetty, K. Evans, P. Cornuaud, A. Kulkarni, D. Duffy, A. Greenough.
Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in very prematurely born infants with evolving/established bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
AJP Rep., 11 (2021), pp. e127-131
[77]
M. Pons-Odena.
Transfer from Hospital to Home Ventilation (Including NIV and MV): A Medical Point of View.
Prolonged and Long-Term Mechanical Ventilation in Children, 1st ed., pp. 303-315
[78]
R.L. McKinney, A. Agarwal.
Transition from intensive care unit to a portable ventilator in children with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Pediatr Pulmonol., 58 (2023), pp. 712-719
[79]
J. Parrilla.
Complications of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation.
Prolonged and Long-Term Mechanical Ventilation in Children, 1st ed., pp. 353-363
[80]
C.M. Foy, M.L. Koncicki, J.D. Edwards.
Liberation and mortality outcomes in pediatric long-term ventilation: a qualitative systematic review.
Pediatr Pulmonol., 55 (2020), pp. 2853-2862
[81]
Z. Zhang, X. Cai, M. Ming, L. Huang, C. Liu, H. Ren, et al.
Incidence, outcome, and prognostic factors of prolonged mechanical ventilation among children in Chinese mainland: a multi-center survey.
[82]
M. Pons-Odena, A. Medina, J. Mayordomo, L. Estepa, H. Tekguc, E. Rossetti, et al.
Ventilación no invasiva en Pediatría.
Manual de Ventilación mecánica pediátrica y neonatal, 6th ed, pp. 1217-1266
Copyright © 2025. Elsevier España, S.L.U. and SEMICYUC
Download PDF
Idiomas
Medicina Intensiva (English Edition)
Article options
Tools