Journal Information
Vol. 42. Issue 8.
Pages 515-516 (November 2018)
Vol. 42. Issue 8.
Pages 515-516 (November 2018)
Letter to the Editor
Full text access
Medicina Intensiva, 29 years of Latin American scientific production
Medicina Intensiva, 29 años de producción científica latinoamericana
Visits
3982
R.M. Hernández
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (1)
Table 1. Publications included in Scopus produced by Latin American institutions between 1988 and 2017.
Full Text
Dear Editor,

Visibility and impact studies of scientific journals are often made to assess their presence in one or more databases.1,2 Scientific production analyses of the different publications3 are able to inform the scientific community of the state of the art of research in a specific field.

The present letter presents a retrospective descriptive analysis of the publications appearing in the journal Medicina Intensiva and included in the Scopus database over the last 29 years (1988–2017). The investigation specifically focuses on the scientific production of authors pertaining to Latin American institutions.

The journal MedicinaIntensiva published 2955 articles included in Scopus during the period 1988–2017. Of these, 129 or 4.4% of the total corresponded to publications generated by Latin American institutions. In terms of the distribution by countries, Argentina generated the largest number of publications (n=48), followed by Mexico (n=19), while Brazil, Ecuador and Peru were at the end the list, with three publications each (Table 1).

Table 1.

Publications included in Scopus produced by Latin American institutions between 1988 and 2017.

Country  No.  Total percentage of publications 1988–2017 
Argentina  48  1.6 
Mexico  19  0.6 
Colombia  18  0.6 
Chile  16  0.5 
Uruguay  12  0.4 
Cuba  0.2 
Brazil  0.1 
Ecuador  0.1 
Peru  0.1 
Total  129  4.4 

With regard to the type of publications produced by authors from Latin American institutions, original papers were seen to predominate (n=80), with Argentina again heading the list. Letters to the Editor were less numerous (n=32), and in relation to this type of publication Mexico was seen to produce the largest number of contributions (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Estimation of the types of publication produced by Latin American institutions, distributed by countries.

(0.09MB).

The results obtained show that MedicinaIntensiva has become a journal that generates and divulgates knowledge in the field of Medicine and intensive care.3 However the contributions of authors from Latin American institutions remain minimal. In this regard it is important to continue strengthening the exchange of new knowledge and to make the contribution of Latin American based studies known to the world.

References
[1]
R. Cañedo Andalia, M. Nodarse Rodríguez, J. Guerrero Pupo, I. Amell Muñoz, M. Small Chapman, L. Milord Ramírez.
Producción científica en salud de Cuba en bases de datos internacionales.
Rev Cuba Inf Cienc Salud, 25 (2014), pp. 442-451
[2]
D. Ortinau.
Writing and publishing important scientific articles: a reviewer's perspective.
J Bus Res, 64 (2011), pp. 150-156
[3]
S.R. Leal-Noval, R. Amaya-Villar, J.L. García-Garmendia, F. Gordo-Vidal, J. Garnacho-Montero.
Política editorial de Medicina Intensiva.
Med Intensiva, 41 (2017), pp. 63-66

Please cite this article as: Hernández RM. Medicina Intensiva, 29 años de producción científica latinoamericana. Med Intensiva. 2018;42:515–516.

Copyright © 2018. Elsevier España, S.L.U. and SEMICYUC
Download PDF
Idiomas
Medicina Intensiva (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?